Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T23:24:53.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mosquito larvae can detect water vibration patterns from a nearby predator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2017

D. Roberts
D. Roberts*
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +968-24146877 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mosquito larvae have been shown to respond to water-borne kairomones from nearby predators by reducing their activity, and thus visibility. If they can identify the predator, they can then alter their response depending upon the associated predation risk. No studies have shown that mosquito larva may also detect water-borne vibrations from the predator. Final instar larvae of three mosquitoes: Culiseta longiareolata, Culex perexiguus and C. quinquefasciatus, were exposed to recorded vibrations from feeding dragonfly nymphs, to dragonfly kairomones and the combined effect of both. Predator vibrations caused C. longiareolata to significantly reduce bottom feeding and instead increased the more passive surface filter feeding. The larvae also significantly increased escape swimming activity. These behavioural changes were not significantly different from the effect of dragonfly kairomones, and there was no synergistic or additional effect of the two. C. perexiguus gave a smaller (but still significant) response to both dragonfly vibrations and to kairomones, probably due to a different feeding behaviour: when lying on the bottom, it was an inactive filter feeder. C. quinquefasciatus did not respond to either vibrations or kairomones and during these experiments was entirely an inactive surface filter feeder. Both C. longiareolata and C. perexiguus were thus able to detect and identify vibrations from feeding dragonfly nymphs as an anti-predator strategy. The lack of response in C. quinquefasciatus is probably a result of living in water that is highly polluted with organic material, where few predators can survive.

Keywords

Culiseta longiareolataCulex perexiguusCulex quinquefasciatusmosquito larvapredator vibrationspredator kairomonefilter feedingpredator avoidance
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 107 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 499 - 505
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Awasthi, A.K., Molinero, J.C., Wu, C.H., Tsai, K.H., King, C.C. & Hwang, J.S. (2015) Behavioral changes in mosquito larvae induced by copepods predation. Hydrobiologia 749, 113–123.Google Scholar
Beketov, M.A. & Liess, M. (2007) Predation risk perception and food scarcity induce alterations of life-cycle traits of the mosquito Culex pipiens . Ecological Entomology 32, 405–410.Google Scholar
Bond, J.G., Arredondo-Jiménez, J.I., Rodríguez, M.H., Quiroz-Martínez, H. & Williams, T. (2005) Oviposition habitat selection for a predator refuge and food source in a mosquito. Ecological Entomology 30, 255–263.Google Scholar
Castellanos, I. & Barbosa, P. (2006) Evaluation of predation risk by a caterpillar using substrate-borne vibrations. Animal Behaviour 72, 461–469.Google Scholar
Chivers, D.P., Wisenden, B.D. & Smith, R.J.F. (1996) Damselfly larvae learn to recognize predators from chemical cues in the predator's diet. Animal Behaviour 52, 315–320.Google Scholar
Cocroft, R.B. (1999) Offspring-parent communication in a subsocial treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae: Umbonia crassicornis). Behaviour 136, 1–21.Google Scholar
Cocroft, R.B. & Rodríguez, R.L. (2005) The behavioral ecology of insect vibrational communication. BioScience 55, 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djemai, I., Casas, J. & Magal, C. (2001) Matching host reactions to parasitoid wasp vibrations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 268, 2403–2408.Google Scholar
Dodds, W. & Whiles, M. (2010) Freshwater Ecology: Concepts and Environmental Application of Limnology. 2nd ed. 829 pp. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Eitam, A., Blaustein, L. & Mangel, M. (2002) Effects of Anisops sardea (Hemiptera: Notonectidae) on oviposition habitat selection by mosquitoes and other dipterans and on community structure in artificial pools. Hydrobiologia 485, 183–189.Google Scholar
Ferrari, M.C.O., Messier, F. & Chivers, D.P. (2007) Threat-sensitive learning of predators by larval mosquitoes Culex restuans . Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62, 1079–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, M.C.O., Elvidge, C.K., Jackson, C.D., Chivers, D.P. & Brown, G.E. (2010) The responses of prey fish to temporal variation in predation risk: sensory habituation or risk assessment? Behavioral Ecology 21, 532–536.Google Scholar
Gimonneau, G., Pombi, M., Dabiré, R.K., Diabaté, A., Morand, S. & Simard, F. (2012) Behavioural responses of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso. Parasites & Vectors 5, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbach, R.E. (1988) The mosquitoes of the subgenus Culex in southwestern Asia and Egypt (Diptera: Culicidae). Contributions of the American Entomological Institute 24, 1–240.Google Scholar
Hill, P.S.M. (2009) How do animals use substrate-borne vibrations as an information source? Die Naturwissenschaften 96, 1355–1371.Google Scholar
Hopper, K.R. (2001) Flexible antipredator behavior in a dragonfly species that coexists with different predator types. Oikos 93, 470–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kesavaraju, B. & Juliano, S.A. (2004) Differential behavioral responses to water-borne cues to predation in two container-dwelling mosquitoes. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97, 194–201.Google Scholar
Koperski, P. (1997) Changes in feeding behaviour of the larvae of the damselfly Enallagma cyathigerum in response to stimuli from predators. Ecological Entomology 22, 167–175.Google Scholar
Losey, J.E. & Denno, R.F. (1998) Interspecific variation in the escape responses of aphids: effect on risk of predation from foliar-foraging and ground-foraging predators. Oecologia 115, 245–252.Google Scholar
Miller, L.A. & Surlykke, A. (2001) How some insects detect and avoid being eaten by bats: tactics and countertactics of prey and predator. BioScience 51, 570–581.Google Scholar
Menon, P.K. & Rajagopalan, P.K. (1980) Relative importance of different types of breeding habitats in contributing to the population of Culex pipiens fatigans in Pondicherry. Indian Journal of Medical Research 71, 725–733.Google Scholar
Peckarsky, B.L. (1987) Mayfly cerci as defense against stonefly predation: deflection and detection. Oikos 48, 161–170.Google Scholar
Pierce, C.L. (1988) Predator avoidance, microhabitat shift, and risk-sensitive foraging in larval dragonflies. Oecologia 77, 81–90.Google Scholar
Roberts, D.M. (2010) A comparison of the physiological age of adult resting versus flying Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). SQU Journal for Science 15, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D.M. (2012) Responses of three species of mosquito larvae to the presence of predatory dragonfly and damselfly larvae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 145, 23–29.Google Scholar
Roberts, D.M. (2014 a) Mosquito larvae change their feeding behavior in response to kairomones from some predators. Journal of Medical Entomology 51, 368–374.Google Scholar
Roberts, D.M. (2014 b) Rapid habituation by mosquito larvae to predator kairomones. Journal of Vector Ecology 39, 355–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roitberg, B.D. & Myers, J.H. (1978) Effect of adult Coccinellidae on the spread of a plant virus by an aphid. Journal of Applied Ecology 15, 775–779.Google Scholar
Roux, O., Diabaté, A. & Simard, F. (2013) Larvae of cryptic species of Anopheles gambiae respond differently to cues of predation risk. Freshwater Biology 58, 1178–1189.Google Scholar
Sih, A. (1986) Antipredator responses and the perception of danger by mosquito larvae. Ecology 67, 434–441.Google Scholar
Silberbush, A. & Blaustein, L. (2011) Mosquito females quantify risk of predation to their progeny when selecting an oviposition site. Functional Ecology 25, 1091–1095.Google Scholar
Stav, G., Blaustein, L. & Margalit, Y. (2000) Influence of nymphal Anax imperator (Odonata: Aeshnidae) on oviposition by the mosquito Culiseta longiareolata (Diptera: Culicidae) and community structure in temporary pools. Journal of Vector Ecology 25, 190–202.Google Scholar
Stoks, R., McPeek, M.A. & Mitchell, J.L. (2003) Evolution of prey behavior in response to changes in predation regime: damselflies in fish and dragonfly lakes. Evolution 57, 574–585.Google Scholar
Stoks, R., De Block, M.D., Van De Meutter, F. & Johansson, F. (2005) Predation cost of rapid growth: behavioural coupling and physiological decoupling. Journal of Animal Ecology 74, 708–715.Google Scholar
Takahara, T., Kohmatsu, Y., Maruyama, A., Doi, H., Yamanaka, H. & Yamaoka, R. (2012) Inducible defense behavior of an anuran tadpole: cue-detection range and cue types used against predator. Behavioral Ecology 23, 863–868.Google Scholar
Van Uitregt, V.O., Hurst, T.P. & Wilson, R.S. (2012) Reduced size and starvation resistance in adult mosquitoes, Aedes notoscriptus, exposed to predation cues as larvae. Journal of Animal Ecology 81, 108–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed