Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:25:14.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monitoring and mass-trapping methodologies using pheromones: the lesser date moth Batrachedra amydraula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

A. Levi-Zada ,
A. Sadowsky ,
S. Dobrinin ,
T. Ticuchinski ,
M. David ,
D. Fefer ,
E. Dunkelblum  and
J.A. Byers
A. Levi-Zada*
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel
A. Sadowsky
Affiliation:
Southern Arava Research and Development, Eilot 88820, Israel
S. Dobrinin
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Extension Service, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
T. Ticuchinski
Affiliation:
Southern Arava Research and Development, Eilot 88820, Israel
M. David
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel
D. Fefer
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel
E. Dunkelblum
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel
J.A. Byers
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: 972-3-9683760 Fax: 972-3-9683781 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The lesser date moth (LDM) Batrachedra amydraula is a significant pest of date palm fruits. Previously, detection and monitoring of the pest was inaccurate due to high costs of sampling with lifting machines. We report a practical system for detection and monitoring of LDM based on pheromone traps and relevant models. Dose–response experiments with LDM pheromone traps indicated a 1 mg lure is optimal for monitoring. Delta traps with adhesive covering their entire inner surface gave the highest captures while trap colour was unimportant. Sampling pheromone traps throughout the night indicated male flight began at 1:00–2:00 and reached a peak 2 h before sunrise. Monitoring traps exposed all year long in Israel revealed three generations with different abundance. Trapping transects in a date plantation indicated interference from a monitoring trap became minimal at distances >27 m away. Inter-trap distances closer than this may lower efficiency of monitoring and mass trapping in control programs. Our estimate of the circular effective attraction radius (EARc) of a 1 mg delta trap for LDM (3.43 m) shows this bait is among the most attractive compared with baits for other insects. We developed encounter-rate equations with the pheromone trap EARc to model the interplay between population levels, trap density and captures that are useful for detection of invasive LDM and its control by mass trapping. The integrated methodologies are applicable to many pest species.

Keywords

Batrachedra amydraulalesser date mothpheromonemonitoringdate plantationseffective attraction radius
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 108 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 58 - 68
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, D.C., Abrahamson, L.P., Eggen, D.A., Lanier, G.N., Swier, S.R., Kelley, R.S. & Auger, M. (1986) Monitoring spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) populations with pheromone-baited traps. Environmental Entomology 15, 152–165.Google Scholar
Asaro, C., Cameron, R.S., Nowak, J.T., Grosman, D.M., Seckinger, J.O. & Berisford, C.W. (2004) Efficacy of wing versus delta traps for predicting infestation levels of four generations of the Nantucket pine tip moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the Southern United States. Environmental Entomology 33, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, D. (1975) Preliminary notes on the phenology and biology of Batrachedra amydraula Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Cosmopterigidae), a new pest of date palms in Israel. Phytoparasitica 3, 55–57.Google Scholar
Blumberg, D. (2004) The management of date pests. p. 426 in Bernstein, Z. (ed.) The Date. The Plant Production and Marketing Board, Tel Aviv, Israel.Google Scholar
Blumberg, D. (2008) Date palm arthropod pests and their management in Israel. Phytoparasitica 36, 411–448.Google Scholar
Blumberg, D., Swirski, E. & Greenberg, S. (1977) Field studies for the control of the lesser date moth. International Pest Control 19, 18–20.Google Scholar
Byers, J.A. (2007) Simulation of mating disruption and mass trapping with competitive attraction and camouflage. Environmental Entomology 36, 1328–1338.Google Scholar
Byers, J.A. (2011) Analysis of vertical distributions and effective flight layers of insects: three-dimensional simulation of flying insects and catch at trap heights. Environmental Entomology 40, 1210–1222.Google Scholar
Byers, J.A. (2012 a) Estimating insect flight densities from attractive trap catches and flight height distributions. Journal of Chemical Ecology 38, 592–601.Google Scholar
Byers, J.A. (2012 b) Modelling female mating success during mass trapping and natural competitive attraction of searching males or females. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 145, 228–237.Google Scholar
Byers, J.A. (2013) Modeling and regression analysis of semiochemical dose-response curves of insect antennal reception and behavior. Journal of Chemical Ecology 39, 1081–1089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byers, J.A. & Naranjo, S.E. (2014) Detection and monitoring of pink bollworm moths and invasive insects using pheromone traps and encounter rate models. Journal of Applied Ecology 51, 1041–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, R.I. (2003) Invasive species research in the United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service. Pest Management Science 59, 827–834.Google Scholar
El-Sayed, A.M., Suckling, D.M., Wearing, C.H. & Byers, J.A. (2006) Potential of mass trapping for long-term pest management and eradication of invasive species. Journal of Economic Entomology 99, 1550–1564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Sayed, A.M., Suckling, D.M., Byers, J.A., Jang, E.B. & Wearing, C.H. (2009) Potential of ‘lure and kill’ in long-term pest management and eradication of invasive species. Journal of Economic Entomology 102, 815–835.Google Scholar
El-Shafie, H.A.F. (2012) List of arthropod pests and their natural enemies identified worldwide on date palm, Phoenix dactylifera L. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 3(12), 516–524.Google Scholar
Gage, S.H., Wirth, T.M. & Simmons, G.A. (1990) Predicting regional gypsy moth (Lymantriidae) population trends in an expanding population using pheromone trap catch and spatial analysis. Environmental Entomology 19, 370–377.Google Scholar
Hulme, P.E. (2009) Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of Applied Ecology 46, 10–18.Google Scholar
Kakar, M.K., Nizamani, S.M., Rustamani, M.A. & Khuhro, R.D. (2010) Periodical lesser date moth infestation on intact and dropped fruits. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 26, 393–396.Google Scholar
Kinawy, M.M., Arissian, M. & Guillon, M. (2015) First field evaluation of mass trapping system for males of the lesser date moth Batrachedra amydraula (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Batrachedridae) in sultanate of Oman. International Journal of Advanced Research and Review 3(5), 223–232.Google Scholar
Levi-Zada, A., Fefer, D., Anshelevitch, L., Litovsky, A., Bengtsson, M., Gindin, G. & Soroker, V. (2011) Identification of the sex pheromone of the lesser date moth, Batrachedra amydraula, using sequential SPME auto-sampling. Tetrahedron Letters 52, 4550–4553.Google Scholar
Levi-Zada, A., Sadowsky, A., Dobrinin, S., David, M., Ticuchinski, T., Fefer, D., Greenberg, A. & Blumberg, D. (2013) Reevaluation of the sex pheromone of the lesser date moth, Batrachedra amydraula, using autosampling SPME-GC/MS and field bioassays. Chemoecology 23, 13–20.Google Scholar
Levi-Zada, A., David, M., Fefer, D., Seplyarsky, V., Sadowsky, A., Dobrinin, S., Ticuchinski, T., Harari, D., Blumberg, D., Dunkelblum, E. (2014) Circadian release of male-specific components of the Greater Date Moth, Aphomia (Arenipses) sabella, using sequential SPME/GC–MS analysis. Journal of Chemical Ecology 40, 236–243.Google Scholar
Sanderson, L.A., McLaughlin, J.A. & Antunes, P.M. (2012) The last great forest: a review of the status of invasive species in the North American boreal forest. Forestry 85, 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlyter, F., Zhang, Q.H., Liu, G.T. & Lan-Zhu, J. (2001) A successful case of pheromone mass trapping of the bark beetle Ips duplicatus in a forest island, analysed by 20-year time-series data. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 6, 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shayesteh, N., Marouf, A. & Amir–Maafi, M. (2010) Some biological characteristics of the Batrachedra amydraula Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Batrachedridae) on main varieties of dry and semi-dry date palm of Iran. 10th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection. Julius-Kühn-Archiv. Volume 425, 151–155.Google Scholar
Suckling, D.M., Stringer, L.D., Stephens, A.E.A., Woods, B., Williams, D.G., Baker, G. & El-Sayed, A.M. (2014) From integrated pest management to integrated pest eradication: technologies and future needs. Pest Management Science 70, 179–189.Google Scholar
Suckling, D.M., Stringer, L.D., Kean, J.M., Lo, P.L., Bell, V., Walker, J.T.S., Twidle, A.M., Jiménez-Pérezg, A. & El-Sayed, A.M. (2015) Spatial analysis of mass trapping: how close is close enough? Pest Management Science 71, 1452–1461.Google Scholar
Walton, V.M., Daane, K.M. & Pringle, K.L. (2004) Monitoring Planococcus ficus in South African vineyards with sex pheromone-baited traps. Crop Protection 23, 1089–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witzgall, P., Kirsch, P. & Cork, A. (2010) Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management. Journal of Chemical Ecology 36, 80–100.Google Scholar
Yamanaka, T. (2007) Mating disruption or mass trapping? Numerical simulation analysis of a control strategy for lepidopteran pests. Population Ecology 49, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziska, L.H., Blumenthal, D.M., Runion, G.B., Hunt, E.R. Jr. & Diaz-Soltero, H. (2011) Invasive species and climate change: an agronomic perspective. Climate Change 105, 13–42.Google Scholar