Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T05:21:43.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Measurement and Control of atmospheric Humidity in relation to Entomological Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Patrick A. Buxton
Patrick A. Buxton
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is a matter of general agreement that atmospheric humidity is often of great importance in limiting the times or places at which insects are abundant. But though one may collect facts which suggest that a particular degree of dryness or dampness favours some stage of an insect, it is not easy to devise experiments which will give unassailable facts. Some of us feel that the precise study of water relations and water balance may lead to greatly increased knowledge of the living insect, and therefore to results of economic value ; and it is certain that a fuller understanding of these matters is delayed because few know the methods appropriate for measuring and controlling humidity.

The purpose of the present paper is to make known a number of practical methods, which might be of service to a worker even in a remote country. As this is my objective, I shall include material which is already well known to physicists, and as our concern is with the conditions in the places where insects are actually living, I have given particular attention to unorthodox devices which can be used in small spaces and which are portable; among the great variety of methods, I have endeavoured to show what is good and bad in each.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 1931 , pp. 431 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beattie, M. V. F. (1928.) Observations on the thermal death-points of the blowfly at different relative humidities.—Bull. Ent. Res., xviii, pp. 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongards, H. (1926.) Feuchtigkeits-messung.—Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brindley, T. A. (1930.) The growth and development of Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera) and Tribolium confusum Duval (Coleoptera) under controlled conditions of temperature and relative humidity.—Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., xxiii, pp. 741–757.Google Scholar
Brooks, R. St. J. (1917.) The influence of saturation deficiency and of temperature on the course of epidemic plague.—J. Hyg., Plague Suppt. 5, pp. 881–899.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1930.) Evaporation from the Meal-worm (Tenebrio : Coleoptera) and atmospheric humidity.—Proc. Roy. Soc., B, cvi, pp. 560–577.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1931.) The law governing the loss of water from an insect.—Proc. Ent. Soc. Lond., vi, pp. 27–31.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G. & Grove, A. J. (1927.) An aerating and circulating apparatus for aquaria and general use.—J. Roy. Microscop. Soc. (3), xlvii.Google Scholar
Dendy, A. & Elkington, H. D. (1920.) Report on the vitality and rate of multiplication of certain grain insects under various conditions of temperature and moisture.—Roy. Soc. Reports of the Grain Pests (War) Committee, no. 7.Google Scholar
Fawcett, H. A. (1930.) A preliminary rat-flea survey and some notes on its relation to local plague, Hong Kong.—J. Hyg., xxx, pp. 482–489.Google Scholar
Griffiths, E. (1925.) The measurement of humidity in closed spaces.—Spec. Rept. no. 8, Food Investigation Board, Great Britain.Google Scholar
Jones, R. M. (1930.) Some effects of temperature and humidity as factors in the biology of the bed-bug (Cimex lectularius Linn.).—Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., xxiii, pp. 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayne, B. (1930.) A study of the influence of relative humidity on the life and infectibility of the mosquito.—Ind. J. Med. Res., xvii, pp. 1119–1137.Google Scholar
MeteorologicalObserver'sHandbook. H.M. Stationery Office (M.O. 191, 1926).Google Scholar
Paranjpe, G. R. (1918.) The vapour pressure of concentrated solutions.—J. Indian Inst. Sci., ii, pp. 59–65.Google Scholar
Parker, J. R. (1930.) Some effects of temperature and moisture upon Melanoplus mexicanus mexicanus Saussure, and Camnula pellucida Scudder (Orthoptera).—Univ. Montana, Agric. Exper. Sta. Bull. no. 223.Google Scholar
Rideal, E. K. & Hanna, A. (1915.) A new chemical hygrometer.—Analyst, xl, pp. 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelford, V. E. (1929.) Laboratory and Field Ecology.—London.Google Scholar
Sikes, E. K. (1931.) Notes on breeding fleas, with reference to humidity and feeding.—Parasitology, xxiii, pp. 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G. C. (1910.) Tables for the reduction of meteorological observations.—Calcutta.Google Scholar
Stoughton, R. H. (1930.) Apparatus for the growing of plants in a controlled environment.—Ann. App. Biol., xvii, pp. 90–106.Google Scholar
Sweetman, H. L. & Fernald, H. T. (1930.) Ecological studies of the Mexican Bean Beetle.—Mass. Agric. Exper. Station Bull. no. 261.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. E. (1921.) Humidity control by means of sulfuric acid solutions, with critical compilation of vapour pressure data.—J. Indust. & Eng. Chem., xiii, pp. 326–331.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. E. & Fuwa, T. (1922.) Humidity equilibria of various common substances.—J. Indust. & Eng. Chem., xiv, p. 913.Google Scholar