Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:23:33.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mating behaviour and fecundity of the red bollworm Diparopsis castanea Hmps. (Lepidoptera Noctuidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. J. Marks
R. J. Marks
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Makoka Research Station, Private Bag 3, Thondwe, Malawi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments in Malawi showed that the (log) number of males of Diparopsis castanea Hmps. attracted to sex pheromone traps was linearly related to the (log) number of virgin females used as attractant. Virgins remained sexually attractive for up to 31 days but were maximally attractive three nights following emergence; 97·7% of light-trapped females were mated, a small proportion having mated four times. Numbers of matings were directly correlated with temperature at 22.00 h, but relative humidity had little effect. Mean fecundity of mated females was 152 ± 10·3 eggs, multiple mating influencing egg fertility rather than total oviposition. Potential fecundity was linearly related to body weight on emergence. Peak oviposition of unfertilised eggs by virgins occurred at about nine nights following emergence. Of emerging females 2% were barren. Only 1·4% of females mated twice in one night when confined outdoors with males, and there was no difference in the abilities of newly emerged males or males up to four days old to mate with newly emerged females or females up to four days old. Although outdoors males mated on average 0·8 times per night throughout their life, and were capable of mating twice per night, mating propensity of males under laboratory conditions was much lower. Males responded to female sex pheromone throughout the calling period of the female, individuals completing up to 143 orientations during a night without the occurrence of lasting physiological habituation to the pheromone. The importance of this in any control programme aimed at disrupting pheromone communication between the sexes is discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , March 1976 , pp. 145 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartell, R. J. & Lawrence, L. A. (1973). Reduction in responsiveness of males of Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera) to sex pheromone following previous brief pheromonal exposure.—J. Insect Physiol. 19, 845–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartell, R. J. & Shorey, H. H. (1969). A quantitative bioassay for the sex pheromone of Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera) and factors limiting male responsiveness.—J. Insect Physiol. 15, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campion, D. G. & Lewis, C. T. (1971). Studies of competitiveness, chemosterilant persistence and sperm structure in treated red bollworms, Diparopsis castanea (Hmps.) In Sterility principle for insect control or eradication. Proceedings of a symposium jointly organised by IAEA and FAO, Athens 14–1803 1970.—183–202. Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Campion, D. G. & Outram, I. (1967). Factors affecting male probing activity of the red bollworm Diparopsis castanea (Hmps.) in relation to sterility induced by tris (1-aziridinyl) phosphine oxide (tepa).—Ann. appl. Biol. 60, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, C. B. (1968). Physiology and behaviour of red bollworm (Diparopsis castanea Hampson).—Rep. Agric. Res. Coun. Cent. Afr. 1967, 103–107.Google Scholar
Fletcher, L. W., Claborn, H. V., Turner, J. P. & Lopez, E. (1968). Difference in response of two strains of screw-worm flies to the male pheromone.—J. econ. Ent. 61, 1386–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, D. E., Graham, H. H. & Fernandez, A. T. (1970). Mating of female tobacco budworms and bollworms collected from light traps.—J. econ. Ent. 63, 1228–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, R. J. (1976). Female sex pheromone release and the timing of male flight in the red bollworm Diparopsis castanea Hmps. (Lepidoptera. Noctuidae), measured by pheromone traps.—Bull. ent. Res. 66, in press.Google Scholar
McKinley, D. J. (1974). An attempt to develop a completely artificial diet for rearing the red bollworm, Diparopsis castanea.—Misc. Rep. Centre Overseas Pest Res. no. 16, 4 pp.Google Scholar
Minks, A. K. (1971). Decreased sex pheromone production in an in-bred stock of the summerfruit tortrix moth, Adoxophyes orana.—Entomologia exp. appl. 14, 361–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesbitt, B. F., Beevor, P. S., Cole, R.A., Lester, R. & Poppi, R. G. (1973a). Sex pheromones of two noctuid moths.—Nature, New Biol. 244, 208–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesbitt, B. F., Beevor, P. S., Cole, R.A., Lester, R. & Poppi, R. G. (1973b). Synthesis of both geometric isomers of the major sex pheromone of the red bollworm moth.—Tetrahedron Lett. no. 47, 4669–4670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesbitt, B. F., Beevor, P. S., Cole, R.A., Lester, R. & Poppi, R. G. (1975). The isolation and identification of the female sex pheromones of the red bollworm moth, Diparopsis castanea.—J. Insect Physiol. 21, 1091–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, E. O. & Mitchell, B. L. (1945). A report on the status and control of insect pests of cotton in the Lower River Districts of Nyasaland.—48 pp. Zomba, Government Printer.Google Scholar
Richerson, J. V. & Cameron, A. E. (1974). Differences in pheromone release and sexual behaviour between laboratory—reared and wild gypsy moth adults.—Environ. Entomol. 3, 475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. S. W. (1957). Rep. Gatooma Res. Stn, Rhodesia.Google Scholar
Shorey, H. H. & Gaston, L. K. (1964). Sex pheromones of noctuid moths—III. Inhibition of male responses to the sex pheromone in Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera. Noctuidae).—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 57, 775–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. (1956). Learning and instinct in animals.—493 pp. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Traynier, R. M. M. (1970). Habituation of the response to sex pheromone in two species of Lepidoptera, with reference to a method of control.—Entomologia exp. appl. 13, 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunstall, J. P. (1968). Pupal development and moth emergence of the red bollworm (Diparopsis castanea Hmps.) in Malawi and Rhodesia.—Bull. ent. Res. 58, 233–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar