Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:35:53.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Life history parameters and predation capacities of Nesidiocoris volucer: a new biological control agent for tomato crop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2022

Lucie Marquereau
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UMR PVBMT, F-97410 Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France
Jean-Sébastien Cottineau
Affiliation:
ARMEFLHOR, F-97410 Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France
Olivier Fontaine
Affiliation:
La Coccinelle©, F-97410 Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France
Frédéric Chiroleu
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UMR PVBMT, F-97410 Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France
Bernard Reynaud
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UMR PVBMT, F-97410 Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France UMR PVBMT, Université de la Réunion, F-97410 Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France
Hélène Delatte*
Affiliation:
CIRAD, UMR PVBMT, F-97410 Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, France
*
Author for correspondence: Hélène Delatte, Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Whiteflies are one of the major pests of tomato under greenhouses, and their control partly relies on biocontrol strategies. Among those biocontrol agents, parasitoids or predators are widely used. However, the introduction of a biocontrol agent in a new area is not trivial. For that reason, we investigated the use of a tropical native mirid, Nesidiocoris volucer (Hemiptera: Miridae), for the biological control of whiteflies among other insect pests on tomato crops under greenhouses in the subtropical island of La Réunion, France. Nesidiocoris volucer life history traits and plant injury were examined. Nymphs developed and survived between 15 and 30°C and required on average 49.41 days at 15°C and on average 10.50 days at 30°C to develop (nymph survival >94%). At 25°C, each female produced on average 65 eggs. Nesidiocoris volucer was able to feed on several prey species, but performed better on whiteflies than on spider mites or thrips. No N. volucer feeding injury was observed on tomato. Nesidiocoris volucer has also been found in tropical countries of Africa, and we believe that the data presented on this natural enemy could be of great importance for the biocontrol of whiteflies in tropical areas.

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The use of invertebrate biological control agents to reduce the population of another organism considered as a pest has been widely adopted, and proved its efficiency, as an environmentally safe pest management method (Gurr and Wratten, Reference Gurr and Wratten2012; Van Lenteren et al., Reference Van Lenteren, Bolckmans, Köhl, Ravensberg and Urbaneja2018). Mirids (Hemiptera: Miridae) have been studied and three main genus Macrolophus, Dicyphus and Nesidiocoris have been used as biological control agents (Van Lenteren, Reference Van Lenteren2012; Van Lenteren et al., Reference Van Lenteren, Bolckmans, Köhl, Ravensberg and Urbaneja2018). These mirids are often considered both pests of major crops and natural predators of diverse invertebrates such as whitefly species, aphids, leafminers, thrips, mite, lepidopteran eggs, small larvae, etc. (Wheeler, Reference Wheeler2001). Studies of these mirids have mostly focused on four species: Dicyphus tamaninii Wagner, Dicyphus hesperus Knight, Macrolophus pygmaeus Rambur and Nesidiocoris tenuis Reuter (Castañé et al., Reference Castañé, Arnó, Gabarra and Alomar2011). Except for D. tamaninii, these species are currently being commercially mass reared as biological control agents (Van Lenteren, Reference Van Lenteren2012). Nesidiocoris tenuis is used to control whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), leafminers (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and spider mites (Arachnida: Tetranychidae) mainly on tomato but also on eggplant and sweet pepper (Riudavets and Castañé, Reference Riudavets and Castañé1998; Ryckewaert and Alauzet, Reference Ryckewaert and Alauzet2002; Urbaneja et al., Reference Urbaneja, Tapia and Stansly2005, Reference Urbaneja, Montón and Mollá2009). However, the beneficial status of N. tenuis is controversial (Pérez-Hedo and Urbaneja, Reference Pérez-Hedo, Urbaneja, Horowitz and Ishaaya2016) because this mirid becomes a plant feeder that causes significant crop damage when prey numbers are low (Arnó et al., Reference Arnó, Castañé, Riudavets and Gabarra2006, Reference Arnó, Castañé, Riudavets and Gabarra2010; Sanchez and Lacasa, Reference Sanchez and Lacasa2008; Sanchez, Reference Sanchez2009).

In Reunion, which is a subtropical island in the Indian Ocean, tomato is the main vegetable crop and is mostly produced in greenhouses, where whiteflies and spider mites are the main pests (Lange and Bronson, Reference Lange and Bronson1981). In addition to causing direct damage to plants, whiteflies vector plant viruses (Polston et al., Reference Polston, De Barro and Boykin2014). To help control whiteflies, farmers can release the parasitoids Encarsia formosa and Eretmocerus eremicus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), both of which are mass reared by the company La Coccinelle© in Reunion (Saint-Pierre). Predators of whiteflies have not yet been reared in Reunion; however, farmers reported increasing problems to control whiteflies with only those parasitoids. Based on the lack of predators as biocontrol agents of tomato pests, we investigated potential indigenous candidates using literature records and direct observations. Among the different candidates, records of a predatory mirid, Nesidiocoris volucer, closely related to N. tenuis, described on the island in 1902 (Kirkaldy, Reference Kirkaldy1902) caught our attention. Indeed, N. volucer was detected preying on the whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) (authors' personal communication), suggesting its potential as a biological control agent. This mirid had also been reported in other tropical countries of Africa such as Tanzania (Kilimanjaro), Cap Verde, Mozambique, Uganda and Sudan (Schuh, Reference Schuh2002–2013) and most recently Niger (Garba et al., Reference Garba, Streito and Gauthier2020) showing its pantropical distribution.

Before considering an organism for use in biological control, thorough investigation of its biology and ecology is needed. The development and maintenance of sufficient numbers of the agent to protect the crop can be affected by temperature, food availability and many other factors (Bale et al., Reference Bale, Allen and Hughes2009; Gurr and Wratten, Reference Gurr and Wratten2012). In this study, we investigated the life history and predation capacities of the indigenous N. volucer, as a potential new biocontrol agent of herbivorous pests under greenhouses conditions. We conducted experiments under controlled conditions to evaluate the influence of temperature on N. volucer development, survival of immature stages, and fecundity when feeding on Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). We then determined the predation capacity of N. volucer on the following greenhouse pests: Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), Tetranychus sp. (Acari: Tetranychidae), Thrips parvispinus Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and T. vaporariorum. Finally, we determined whether N. volucer injures tomato plants.

Materials and methods

Insects used in this study

Tobacco whitefly

A laboratory population of the exotic invasive whitefly B. tabaci MEAM1 (formerly named B biotype) established from field-collected individuals in 2001 (Delatte et al., Reference Delatte, Reynaud, Granier, Thornary, Lett, Goldbach and Peterschmitt2005) on cotton (Gossypium sp.) was used. This MEAM1 colony is kept in several ventilated Plexiglas containers (60 × 40 × 60 cm) in a climate (temperature and humidity controlled) room at 25°C, 70% relative humidity (RH), and a 16:8 (L:D) h photoperiod. For experiments, leaves with 4th–5th instar nymphs were collected and examined with a dissecting microscope to remove any drops of honeydew that are naturally produced by B. tabaci instars.

Greenhouse whitefly

A colony of T. vaporariorum initiated (from field-collected individuals) in 2010 on tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum L.) in the La Coccinelle© greenhouses was used. Leaves with 4th–5th-instar nymphs were collected for the different experiments.

Spider mite

Spider mite specimens of Tetranychus sp. group desertorum (probably T. evansi species, the only described species from this group in Reunion) were collected from a natural population infesting tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) at the La Coccinelle© facility. The remaining parts after morphological identification and paratypes were deposited as voucher specimens (no. LMAR00003_01) in the collection of CIRAD, UMR PVBMT in Saint-Pierre, La Réunion in ethanol tubes. For the experiments described below, individuals were collected on tomato leaves, examined with a dissecting microscope and transferred to young leaves of tomato seedlings that were not infested with other insects.

Thrips

Specimens of T. parvispinus (Karny) were collected from a population infesting sweet pepper (Capsicum annum L.) in a greenhouse (ARMEFLHOR, Saint Pierre). To determine the species, DNA was extracted from four individuals and a portion of the gene encoding cytochrome oxidase I (COI) was used for DNA barcoding. Paratypes in ethanol-preserved tubes are available in the insect collection of CIRAD, UMR PVBMT in Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, voucher no. MTEN00002_0201. Larvae and adults were transferred to young cotton leaves obtained from insect-free plants that had been grown in a climate room at 25°C, 70% RH and a 16:8 (L:D) h photoperiod.

Predatory bug

A wild population of the predatory bug N. volucer was collected in 2010 from weeds in Saint Paul, La Réunion and further maintained on a T. vaporariorum colony in the La Coccinelle© facility. Since then, the N. volucer population has been maintained on T. vaporariorum on tobacco in a greenhouse at the company. Specimens of this N. volucer population were examined by a mirid specialist (JC Streito, INRA, CBGP, France) who confirmed their identity. In addition, DNA was extracted from four specimens, and a portion of the gene that encodes COI was used for DNA barcoding of the N. volucer population. Paratypes are available in the insect collection of CIRAD, UMR PVBMT in Saint-Pierre, La Réunion, vouchers no. MATI00012_0101 and MATI00035_0101; GenBank accession numbers KT201360 and KT201350. All N. volucer specimens used in this study originated from the same population at the La Coccinelle© facility.

Data analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with the statistical program R 4.1.1 (R Development Core Team, 2021). Different statistical approaches were used, as detailed below in each experimental section: Fisher's exact tests or χ 2 tests, pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and the generalized linear mixed model [GLMM, package lme4 (Bates et al., Reference Bates, Mächler, Bolker and Walker2014)], with deviance tests on fixed effects (based on a χ2 test) and, if necessary, Tukey's all pair comparison tests [package multcomp (Hothorn et al., Reference Hothorn, Bretz and Westfall2008)]. A Bonferroni-like correction was applied for pairwise tests. The P-values of significance level are indicated for all tests.

Experimental design

Climate chambers description

All experiments were conducted in five climate chambers (Sanyo, MLR-350) that enabled control of temperature. Each of the five climate chambers was set with a temperature according to the experimental design (15, 20, 25, 30 and 35°C). A data logger (HOBO U12-013, Onset®, USA) was inserted in each chamber to confirm temperature and RH during all experiments.

Plastic cups design used throughout the study

All of the laboratory experiments used plastic cups (48 mm diameter, 23 mm high). Each cup contained a leaf disc of the tested plant, which was placed on a 5 mm layer of agar (1%). A sharp round plastic shape of 46 mm of diameter was used to obtain each leaf disc. Each cup also had a lid with a ventilation hole covered with fine-mesh gauze.

Development of nymphs

The developmental times for N. volucer nymphs were studied at 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35°C, with 76 ± 9% RH and a 12:12 (L:D) h photoperiod (Sanyo, MLR-350). For doing so, 120 N. volucer adults (60 males and 60 females) were collected from the La Coccinelle© greenhouse and transferred to mesh cages (50 × 50 × 50 cm) containing a 30 cm-tall tobacco plant, on which they mated and laid eggs. Adults were removed 4 h later, and the tobacco plant was transferred to a climate chamber (Sanyo, MLR-350) at 25°C and with 60 ± 10% RH and a 12:12 (L:D) h photoperiod. Hatched nymphs were collected daily and individually caged in plastic cups (48 mm diameter, 23 mm high) with a tobacco leaf disc on agar and with E. kuehniella (Biobest©) eggs provided ad libitum at each of the five temperatures. Development and survival of nymphs were recorded daily, and the sex of newly emerged adults was determined. For each temperature, 61–72 individual nymphs were monitored, as a whole the development of 330 nymphs were individually followed (tables 1 and 2). This set up allowed us to follow individually each of nymphs until their adult stage.

Table 1. Mean (SEM) development time (in days) for eggs and nymphs of Nesidiocoris volucer at various temperatures (in °C)

nd, no development.

N, number of individuals. For nymphs, we considered the individuals that completed their cycle from egg to adult, or at 35°C, individuals that achieved their 3rd instar (see table 2 for N at each stage).

* Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly from pairwise Wilcoxon rank test with Bonferroni-like correction (P < 0.01).

Table 2. Survival (S) in percentage at each stage of the nymph development, sex ratio in percentage (with binomial standard deviation), of Nesidiocoris volucer

N, number of individuals; –, no data.

*Overall survival with the same letter are not significantly different (pairwise χ2 test, all P > 0.05 except for 35°C where P < 0.001 vs. all other temperatures).

**No significant differences between temperature (χ2 test, P = 0.976).

Effects of sex and rearing temperature on the duration of N. volucer nymph development were analysed using a pairwise Wilcoxon rank test with a Bonferroni-like correction. The effect of rearing temperature on overall survival was analysed with a Fisher's exact test on a contingency table containing the total number of dead nymphs and living adults at each temperature. For each temperature, the comparison of instar survival was done by a Fisher's exact test using a contingency table containing the number of dead and living nymphs at each instar. Differences in the sex ratio between rearing temperatures were tested with a χ2 test.

Development of eggs

To determine the developmental time of eggs, eggs were obtained using the same protocol that was used to obtain hatched nymphs but the tobacco plants with eggs were directly transferred into a climate chamber at each of the five temperatures. Ephestia kuehniella eggs were sprinkled on the leaves, and the newly hatched nymphs were counted daily. For each temperature, 49–150 eggs were studied (tables 1 and 2). A pairwise Wilcoxon rank test was done with a Bonferroni-like correction to compare egg developmental durations between the five rearing temperatures.

Fecundity

The fecundity of 33 N. volucer females was investigated at 25 ± 1°C and with 89 ± 6% RH and a 16:8 (L:D) h photoperiod (in a climate chamber Sanyo, MLR-350). To obtain newly emerged adult to conduct this experiment, over hundreds of 4th–5th-instar nymphs of N. volucer were collected from the greenhouse rearing and maintained in plastic cups described above with a tobacco leaf disc placed on a 5 mm layer of agar (1%) sprinkled with an ad libitum quantity of E. kuehniella eggs. Newly emerged adults were collected each day for use in this experiment. Then, one female with two males, newly emerged, were transferred to a ventilated cylinder plastic cage (88 mm diameter, 255 mm high) with a mature tomato leaflet sprinkled with E. kuehniella eggs. In total, 33 cups, containing one female and two males were used. All leaflets were kept at 25°C (in a climate chamber Sanyo, MLR-350) and were inspected daily. In order to always keep fresh leaves for egg laying, adults were transferred to a new ventilated cylinder plastic cage with a mature tomato leaflet sprinkled with E. kuehniella eggs twice each week. Dead males were replaced until the female died. All leaflets kept at 25°C (for each female cylinder plastic cage) were inspected daily for hatched nymphs during 2 weeks after adult removal. Whenever hatched nymphs were observed, they were removed from the leaflets and counted to assess fecundity for each of the 33 females. This set up allowed us to follow individually the fecundity of each of the female until their death. Nesidiocoris volucer fecundity (as indicated by the number of hatched nymphs) was statistically analysed by a GLMM with a Poisson distribution, with weeks as a fixed effect and with each individual female as a random effect. A pairwise Tukey test with Bonferroni-like correction was used to compare weekly fecundity.

Predation

Predation by N. volucer adults was assessed on adult thrips (T. parvispinus), adult spider mites (Tetranychus sp.) and nymphs of two whitefly species (B. tabaci and T. vaporariorum), see insects section to have more details on each of the mentioned prey used in this section. Newly emerged adults of N. volucer were placed individually in plastic cups containing one leaf disc of the host plant but no prey (cotton, tomato, sweet pepper or tobacco, according to the prey rearing material). After 12 h for males and 24 h for female, each N. volucer adult was transferred in a similar plastic cup with ad libitum prey, and each adult was observed individually for 20 min with a dissecting microscope. The number of prey killed and predation behaviours (probing a prey and feeding on a prey) were recorded (Supplementary fig. S1: N. volucer feeding on T. vaporariorum nymphs). The following behaviours were also recorded and gathered in different classes: (i) the class ‘other feedings’ was gathering several behaviours: probing of the agar, probing of the leaf disc, probing of water droplets or probing on honeydew (produced by whiteflies); (ii) the class ‘contact’ was represented by behaviours of a contact made by the predator without feeding on the leaf disc; (iii) the class ‘other behaviours’ was represented by behaviours of resting, grooming and moving without probing; (iv) the last behaviour class was defined as ‘prey feeding’ including attack and consumption of the prey. The probing behaviour was referred here as the action of tasting different media by the predator. Each combination of prey species and N. volucer sex was represented by 14–20 replicate cups. The number of killed prey by N. volucer adults was analysed with a GLMM with a Poisson distribution, with the type of prey, the sex of the predator and their interaction as fixed effects and the experiment as a random effect. Because the interaction between sex and type of prey was significant, the effect of sex was tested for each type of prey and vice versa by a pairwise Tukey test with a Bonferroni-like correction.

Effect of prey on development and longevity

We determined the effect of prey species on the duration of N. volucer nymph development and the longevity of adults. The prey included larvae and adult thrips (T. parvispinus), adult spider mites (Tetranychus sp.), nymphs of two whitefly species (B. tabaci and T. vaporariorum) and E. kuehniella eggs. This experiment used newly N. volucer hatched nymphs and newly emerged adults that were placed individually in plastic cups (as described above) with the tested prey on a leaf disc of the host plant of the prey (see above insects section). The cups were kept at 25°C (in a climate chamber Sanyo, MLR-350), and tested prey and leaf discs were replaced twice each week. Leaf discs without prey were used as a control in each of the combination tested. The mortality of nymphs and adults was recorded daily. Each prey species was represented by 24–128 replicate cups for nymphs and by 25–88 replicate cups for adults (see table 3). The longevity of N. volucer adults according to each prey was each analysed with a GLMM with a Poisson distribution, with the type of prey, the sex of the predator and their interaction as fixed effects and the experiment as a random effect. Because the interaction between sex and type of prey was significant, the effect of sex was tested for each type of prey and vice versa by a pairwise Tukey tests with a Bonferroni-like correction. The survival of N. volucer nymphs was analysed with a pairwise χ2 test with a Bonferroni-like correction. A pairwise Wilcoxon rank test was done with a Bonferroni-like correction to compare nymph developmental time, according to sex and the type of prey.

Table 3. Mean (SEM) nymph development time (in days), survival of nymphs and longevity of adults (in days) of Nesidiocoris volucer feeding on several prey

N, number of individuals; nd, no development; –, no data.

For nymph survival, survival within a column followed by the same letter does not differ significantly from a pairwise χ2 test with a Bonferroni-like correction (P = 0.05).

For nymph development time, means within a column followed by the same letter do not differ significantly from a pairwise Wilcoxon rank test with a Bonferroni-like correction (P < 0.0001).

For adult longevity, means within a column followed by the same letter do not differ significantly from a pairwise Tukey test (P = 0.05). The last column ‘P’ shows P-value of the effect of the predator sex on his longevity for each prey from pairwise Tukey test.

Injury of plants by N. volucer feeding

Feeding injury to plants caused by N. volucer was assessed under controlled conditions (i.e. constant number of insect per plant). The experiment was made on potted tomato plants in a greenhouse. Twelve newly emerged N. volucer females and 12 N. volucer males were collected (already mating) in the N. volucer rearing greenhouse and transferred in couple – in plastic cups. After 48 h, time considered as enough for the end of mating, the males and females were placed individually in a large insect-proof cap that enclosed the apical part of a 20 cm-tall tomato plant (one cap with one insect per plant). Twelve other tomato plants with no insect in the cap were used as blank controls. After 11 days (average time where adults of N. volucer died without prey nor leaf, results obtained in a preliminary test in lab conditions at 25°C), the caps and still alive N. volucer individuals were removed, and the plants were examined for damage. Damage looked for were as follows: number of brown rings and scars on the stem, petioles of leaves and leaflets. Each plant was grown for an additional 4 weeks during which it was examined for damage twice each week as described in Arnó et al. (Reference Arnó, Castañé, Riudavets and Gabarra2010) and compared to the growth development of the control plants.

Results

Development of eggs and nymphs

The mean (SEM) developmental time of N. volucer eggs ranged from 27.59 (0.06) days at 15°C to 6.10 (0.03) days at 35°C (table 1). Mean egg developmental time significantly differed between all temperatures tested (all P < 0.0001), except between 30 and 35°C (P = 0.75). At 35°C, no nymphs survived beyond the 4th instar, and data from rearing at 35°C were only used to compare the survival of instars. The mean (SEM) duration of the entire developmental period for nymphs ranged from 49.41 (0.25) days at 15°C to 10.50 (0.07) days at 30°C (table 1). Pairwise comparisons of nymph development indicated significant differences between all temperatures, whatever the sex (all P < 0.0001, table 1). There was no difference between male and female at 25°C (P = 0.85), but a very slightly significant difference at 30°C (P = 0.049) was observed. A significant difference at 15 and 20°C (P = 0.015 and P < 0.001, respectively) was also observed.

The sex ratio was not significantly affected by temperature (P = 0.976). Overall survival of nymphs ranged from 94 to 100% (table 2) and did not depend on the temperature. Survival of instars was not significantly affected by temperatures between 15 and 30°C (all P > 0.106) but was significantly reduced (P < 0.0001) at 35°C (table 2).

Female longevity and fecundity

The average (SEM) female longevity was 27.12 (1.58) days, and the maximum longevity was 49 days. Fecundity in terms of numbers of nymphs that hatched ranged from 8 to 142 per female. The mean (SEM) number of total offspring produced per female was 65.0 (5.89) with a significant effect on the week (P < 0.0001). Nevertheless, no significant differences between the first 3 weeks were found (all P > 0.820) (fig. 1). The first 3 weeks accounted for 81.9% of the total number of hatched nymphs, and these 3 weeks were each significantly different from the other weeks (P < 0.001 with weeks 4–6). Week 4 was significantly different from weeks 5 and 6 (P < 0.001). There was only one female laying eggs on week 7.

Figure 1. Weekly number of eggs laid (hatched nymphs) by an initial number of 33 females of Nesidiocoris volucer followed until their death. The number of eggs is presented by a boxplot displaying the distribution of data based on a five number summary: minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile and maximum of values observed. Whiskers extend to the most extreme data point which is no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range from the box. ▴ indicates the absolute mean number of eggs per female each week (values given by the model prediction, including no random effect).

Predation and the effect of prey species and stage on N. volucer development and longevity

When the prey was B. tabaci, Tetranychus sp., T. parvispinus or T. vaporariorum, the average time spent exhibiting predatory behaviour (contact and prey feeding, fig. 2) was 64.1, 80.4, 41.8 and 85.6%, respectively, for N. volucer females and 54.5, 56.1, 24.6 and 75.8%, respectively, for N. volucer males (fig. 2). A significant interaction between sex and type of prey (P = 0.014) on the number of prey killed was observed. For each prey, the mean number killed did not significantly differ between N. volucer males and females (all P > 0.221), except that significantly more Tetranychus sp. were killed by females than males (P < 0.0001) (fig. 2). Significantly fewer T. parvispinus than other prey were killed by females (P < 0.007) and males (P < 0.007). Probing of the leaf disc and agar was observed regardless of prey type.

Figure 2. Percentage of elapsed time recorded during 20 min for each behaviour of females (1) and males (2) of Nesidiocoris volucer feeding on (a) Bemisia tabaci 4th–5th instar nymphs (n female = 16; n male = 18), (b) Tetranychus sp. adults (n female = 20; n male = 18), (c) Thrips parvispinus adults (n female = 14; n male = 17) and (d) Trialeurodes vaporariorum 4th–5th instar nymphs (n female = 20; n male = 20). The mean number of prey killed $\bar{n}_{{\rm prey}}$ (SEM) is indicated under each graph. For numbers of killed prey (transformed data), means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different from Tukey's all pair comparison test with Bonferroni-like correction (P = 0.05). For each prey tested, within a row, the symbol between the two graphs indicates if the mean number of killed prey by sex differ significantly (***) or not (NS) from deviance test (P = 0.05). Recorded behaviours were separated into four different classes, see material and methods section for more details.

Nesidiocoris volucer nymphs died before reaching the adult stage when fed on adults of Tetranychus sp. or adults of T. parvispinus, and obviously with no prey (table 3). For the four other feedings, nymph survival was 61.2, 66.7, 77.6 and 87.6% for nymph fed with B. tabaci, instars of T. parvispinus, T. vaporariorum or E. kuehniella, respectively. Mean developmental time did not significantly differ between male and female nymphs whatever the feeding (all P > 0.254). Mean development duration significantly differs for N. volucer nymphs fed with E. kuehniella eggs, T. vaporariorum nymphs, B. tabaci nymphs and T. parvispinus larvae (all P < 0.0001). For N. volucer nymphs, the longest development times corresponded with the lowest survival rates (table 3).

The longevity of N. volucer adults was significantly affected by the interaction between sex and the type of prey (P < 0.0001). Nesidiocoris volucer females lived significantly longer when fed with E. kuehniella, or B. tabaci, than when fed with the other species tested (P < 0.0001), and males fed with T. vaporariorum (P < 0.0001). Longevity was shorter for males and females that were not fed with prey or that were fed with T. parvispinus (P < 0.0001). Females lived significantly longer than males when fed with B. tabaci (P < 0.001) or with E. kuehniella (P < 0.0001) (table 3).

Plant injury caused by N. volucer

After 11 days, when the adults were removed, zero of 12 males were alive and four of 12 females were alive, and no damage to the plant were recorded. After the plants had grown an additional 4 weeks, the damage was still not observed. Damage was also absent on the 12 control plants (i.e. those without N. volucer adults).

Discussion

The results of this study suggest that the native mirid N. volucer may be an effective predator of insect pests in greenhouses in La Réunion and might probably be in other tropical areas such as it was observed in the field in Niger (Garba et al., Reference Garba, Streito and Gauthier2020). The establishment and performance of biological control agents are greatly affected by temperature (Bale et al., Reference Bale, Allen and Hughes2009; Hughes et al., Reference Hughes, Bale and Sterk2009), and we found that temperature significantly influenced the developmental time of the immature stages of N. volucer. Development from egg to adult required only 17 days at 30°C but 77 days at 15°C. However, neither sex ratio nor nymph survival was influenced by temperature (except nymphs failed to develop at 35°C); nymph mortality was <6% at temperatures between 15 and 30°C. Reunion is known for its multitude of climates and its significant temperature changes, which are greatly affected by altitude (Robert, Reference Robert2003). Our results suggest that this indigenous insect might be well adapted to the multiple environmental conditions found on the island. On the other hand, the rate of development was much greater at 30°C than at 15°C (the lower temperature tested), suggesting that N. volucer populations might be more effective as biological control agents in the warmer, low altitude parts of the island.

The effects of temperature on the duration of N. volucer immature stages reported here are similar to those previously reported for N. tenuis (Hughes et al., Reference Hughes, Bale and Sterk2009; Sanchez, Reference Sanchez2009). The latter authors, however, reported much higher mortality for immature stages of N. tenuis than we recorded for N. volucer, i.e. N. tenuis mortality was 48% at 15.5°C and 37% at 15°C. The thermophilic nature of N. tenuis means that it is unlikely to establish in cooler areas (Hughes et al., Reference Hughes, Bale and Sterk2009, Reference Hughes, Alford, Sterk and Bale2010; Sanchez, Reference Sanchez2009), and about 50% of its nymphs were able to mature to the adult stage at 35°C (Sanchez, Reference Sanchez2009), which was not the case for N. volucer in the current study. Nevertheless, the high survival of N. volucer immature stages on a large range of temperature could make it as effective as or more effective than N. tenuis in greenhouses in tropical area.

To be effective, a biological control agent should have a high reproductive potential (Hastings, Reference Hastings1997; Uneke, Reference Uneke2007). Nesidiocoris volucer females produced an average of 65 viable eggs (as indicated by the numbers of nymphs that hatched) at 25°C, and the maximum recorded in our study was 142. More than 80% of the eggs were laid during the first 3 weeks of the female's adult life. Sanchez et al. (Reference Sanchez, Lacasa, Arnó, Castane and Alomar2009) found a similar fecundity for N. tenuis at 25°C, with a mean (SEM) of 60.0 (5.00) eggs per female deposited during the first 3 weeks of the female's adult life. At 20 and 30°C, N. tenuis produced 79.5 (5.50) and 68.0 (4.99) eggs per female, respectively (Sanchez et al., Reference Sanchez, Lacasa, Arnó, Castane and Alomar2009). Additional research is needed to determine how N. volucer fecundity is affected by temperatures other than 25°C and especially at lower temperatures. Given that N. tenuis is successfully mass reared and given the N. volucer fecundity recorded here, we suspect that fecundity will not be a limiting factor for the mass rearing of N. volucer.

In the current study, we investigated N. volucer predation on a local range of prey, among the main insect pest of greenhouse-produced tomatoes in La Réunion (Delatte et al., Reference Delatte, Lett, Lefeuvre, Reynaud, Peterschmitt and Czosnek2007). Although our observations indicate that N. volucer males and females fed on each of the four prey, the prey type and stage significantly influenced the duration of N. volucer nymph instars and the longevity of N. volucer adults. However, nymph development was fastest when N. volucer females fed on E. kuehniella eggs. This food has often been used to feed predacious insects because of its high protein content (Morales-Ramos et al., Reference Morales-Ramos, Rojas, Coudron, Morales-Ramos, Rojas and Shapiro-Ilan2014). However, E. kuehniella eggs are expensive and cannot be used for the mass rearing of predators. Still, E. kuehniella eggs could be useful to help establish an N. volucer population in a greenhouse or as a complementary food (Urbaneja-Bernat et al., Reference Urbaneja-Bernat, Mollá, Alonso, Bolkcmans, Urbaneja and Tena2015).

Among all pests tested as prey for N. volucer, the whiteflies B. tabaci and T. vaporariorum supported the fastest nymph development, one of the highest survival rate, and the greatest adult longevity. Similar results were observed for N. tenuis (Perdikis and Arvaniti, Reference Perdikis and Arvaniti2016). Although numbers of Tetranychus sp., B. tabaci and T. vaporariorum killed by N. volucer adult predators were not significantly different in the current study, N. volucer nymphs could not complete their development and adults had shorter lifespans when fed with Tetranychus sp. This suggests that Tetranychus sp. might not provide sufficient nutrients for the development and maximal survival of N. volucer. Other studies have demonstrated that the type of prey can greatly affect predator development and reproduction (Bonte et al., Reference Bonte, De Hauwere, Conlong and De Clercq2015; Ugine et al., Reference Ugine, Krasnoff, Grebenok, Behmer and Losey2018). In the current study, N. volucer nymphs developed on T. parvispinus larvae but not on T. parvispinus adults, which are more mobile than the larvae. Although N. volucer was able to predate Tetranychus sp. and adults of T. parvispinus, our results suggest that the complete development of nymphs on these prey would require complementary food like E. kuehniella.

Several studies have found that biological control tended to be stronger when agents were generalists rather than specialists (Symondson et al., Reference Symondson, Sunderland and Greenstone2002; Stiling and Cornelissen, Reference Stiling and Cornelissen2005). Nesidiocoris tenuis is mostly used against whiteflies on tomato, but can be considered as a generalist predator, i.e. it can contribute to the control of thrips, leafminers, spider mites and other lepidopterans in the greenhouse (Riudavets and Castañé, Reference Riudavets and Castañé1998; Schaefer and Panizzi, Reference Schaefer and Panizzi2000; Calvo et al., Reference Calvo, Bolckmans, Stansly and Urbaneja2009; Hassanpour et al., Reference Hassanpour, Bagheri, Golizadeh and Farrokhi2016). This generalist predator is closely related to N. volucer, and (i) regarding the current results, (ii) the recent field study conducted in Niger that has detected N. volucer in tomato fields infested with Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) (Garba et al., Reference Garba, Streito and Gauthier2020) and (iii) previous studies on N. tenuis, it tends to indicate that the prey range is similar for the two species, placing N. volucer as a potential efficient generalist predator.

A biological control agent should control the pest without detrimental side effects (Gurr and Wratten, Reference Gurr and Wratten2012; Van Lenteren et al., Reference Van Lenteren, Bolckmans, Köhl, Ravensberg and Urbaneja2018). Many mirids are zoophytophagous and can cause economically significant damage to crops (Wheeler, Reference Wheeler2001; Castañé et al., Reference Castañé, Arnó, Gabarra and Alomar2011). Nesidiocoris tenuis, for example, causes necrotic rings, flower abortion, reduced growth and small fruits (Sanchez and Lacasa, Reference Sanchez and Lacasa2008; Calvo et al., Reference Calvo, Bolckmans, Stansly and Urbaneja2009; Arnó et al., Reference Arnó, Castañé, Riudavets and Gabarra2010). Some predators use plant material to complement or supplement their diet in order to enhance their fitness (Maleki et al., Reference Maleki, Ashouri, Mohaghegh and Bandani2006; Ugine et al., Reference Ugine, Krasnoff, Grebenok, Behmer and Losey2018). In our study, N. volucer nymphs could not complete their development without prey, and adult longevity was quite reduced in the absence of prey even when plant tissue was available. These results demonstrate that N. volucer requires animal prey as a component of its diet. We observed that N. volucer punctured the leaf discs even when prey were present. Perhaps N. volucer obtains supplemental food or water from plants. We suspect that water may be important because predaceous heteroptera use extra-oral digestion and therefore require a substantial amount of water to feed on their prey (Cohen, Reference Cohen1995). They also need water to maintain their physiological status. This required water is mainly obtained from plant tissues (Castañé et al., Reference Castañé, Arnó, Gabarra and Alomar2011). When N. volucer adults were contained on the top of tomato plants without prey, they did not cause visible damage to the plants even after 6 weeks. However, this experiment did not allow us to test for all possible damage on tomato plants (i.e. flower abortion). Mirids could injure different parts of the plant (stems, leaves, fruits, flowers), and the injury might differ among mirid stages. Additional observations of a N. volucer population in a tomato greenhouse during the entire 6-month growing cycle were made (authors' personal communication) and indicated that N. volucer did not damage any plant, even though the numbers of N. volucer nymphs sometimes exceeded 100 per plant. Arnó et al. (Reference Arnó, Castañé, Riudavets and Gabarra2006) observed that the zoophytophagous N. tenuis caused necrotic rings on tomato, and that the damage was positively correlated with the number of adult mirids. Although N. tenuis and N. volucer are closely related, our observations suggest that they differ in their direct effects on plants. If N. volucer is able to regulate pest numbers without damaging host plants, it could be a very useful biological control agent. Additional research is still needed on how N. volucer affects pest numbers and crop yields.

This study has shown that N. volucer has thermal plasticity, can reproduce and develop in tomato greenhouses, does not damage the plants supporting its prey, and is a generalist predator that feeds on T. vaporariorum, B. tabaci, T. parvispinus and Tetranychus sp. The results suggest that N. volucer could be useful for the biological control of insect pests in tomato greenhouses of La Réunion and a candidate could be tested in other tropical environments where it is also present (Schuh, Reference Schuh2002–2013). The effectiveness of N. volucer could be increased by applying it with other biological control agents. Based on a meta-analysis, Stiling and Cornelissen (Reference Stiling and Cornelissen2005) found that the addition of two or more biological control agents would increase mortality by 12.97% and decrease pest abundance by 27.17% compared to the addition of one biological control agent. Only two parasitoids, E. formosa and E. eremicus, are currently mass reared to control whiteflies on La Réunion; biological control of whiteflies might be increased by complementing these parasitoids with N. volucer. Rearing of this mirid, in small quantity, is already successful on tobacco and it has been efficiently established in a tomato greenhouse for 6 months, revealing our ability to raise it. As a whole, all those results have shown to present this mirid as a new generalist predator for tomato pests under greenhouse (with great suitability for tropical and subtropical climates), its development in mass-rearing facilities has started in La Réunion.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485321001164

Acknowledgements

We thank Martial Grondin (CIRAD), Elenie Minatchy and Mickaël Tenailleau (ARMEFLHOR), Louis Dijoux, Stéphane Robert, Rosaire Tangama and Tristan Schmitt (La Coccinelle©) for technical assistance. We thank Agathe Allibert (CIRAD) for statistical assistance. We thank B. Jaffee for his English editing that has contributed to the improvement of this manuscript. The authors acknowledge the Plant protection Plateform (3P, IBISA) where all experiments were conducted. This research is a collaborative research between the three institutions that are part of the UMT BAT: CIRAD, ARMEFLHOR and the biofabric Coccinelle©.

Financial support

This work was funded by CIRAD, the French Ministry of Agriculture (MAAF), Région Réunion and the European Union: European Agricultural Funds for Rural Development (EAFRD).

Conflict of interest

None.

References

Arnó, J, Castañé, C, Riudavets, J and Gabarra, R (2006) Characterization of damage to tomato plants produced by the zoophytophagous predator Nesidiocoris tenuis. IOBC WPRS Bulletin 29, 249.Google Scholar
Arnó, J, Castañé, C, Riudavets, J and Gabarra, R (2010) Risk of damage to tomato crops by the generalist zoophytophagous predator Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) (Hemiptera: Miridae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 100, 105115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bale, J, Allen, C and Hughes, G (2009) Thermal ecology of invertebrate biological control agents: establishment and activity. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods (ISBCA), pp. 57–65.Google Scholar
Bates, D, Mächler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2014) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823.Google Scholar
Bonte, J, De Hauwere, L, Conlong, D and De Clercq, P (2015) Predation capacity, development and reproduction of the southern African flower bugs Orius thripoborus and Orius naivashae (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) on various prey. Biological Control 86, 5259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, J, Bolckmans, K, Stansly, PA and Urbaneja, A (2009) Predation by Nesidiocoris tenuis on Bemisia tabaci and injury to tomato. Biocontrol 54, 237246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castañé, C, Arnó, J, Gabarra, R and Alomar, O (2011) Plant damage to vegetable crops by zoophytophagous mirid predators. Biocontrol 59, 2229.Google Scholar
Cohen, AC (1995) Extra-oral digestion in predaceous terrestrial Arthropoda. Annual Review of Entomology 40, 85103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delatte, H, Reynaud, B, Granier, M, Thornary, L, Lett, JM, Goldbach, R and Peterschmitt, M (2005) A new silverleaf-inducing biotype Ms of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) indigenous of the islands of the south-west Indian Ocean. Bulletin of Entomological Research 95, 2935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delatte, H, Lett, JM, Lefeuvre, P, Reynaud, B and Peterschmitt, M (2007) An insular environment before and after TYLCV introduction. In Czosnek, H (ed.), Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus Disease, Management, Molecular Biology, Breeding for Resistance. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garba, M, Streito, J and Gauthier, N (2020) First report of three predatory bugs (Heteroptera: Miridae) in tomato fields infested by the invasive South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta in Niger: an opportunity for biological control? Phytoparasitica 48, 215229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, G and Wratten, S (2012) Biological Control: Measures of Success. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Hassanpour, M, Bagheri, M, Golizadeh, A and Farrokhi, S (2016) Functional response of Nesidiocoris tenuis (Hemiptera: Miridae) to Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae): effect of different host plants. Biocontrol Science and Technology 26, 14891503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, A (1997) Population Biology: Concepts and Models. New York, NY, USA: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, T, Bretz, F and Westfall, P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal 50, 346363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, GE, Bale, JS and Sterk, G (2009) Thermal biology and establishment potential in temperate climates of the predatory mirid Nesidiocoris tenuis. Biocontrol 54, 785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, GE, Alford, L, Sterk, G and Bale, JS (2010) Thermal activity thresholds of the predatory mirid Nesidiocoris tenuis: implications for its efficacy as a biological control agent. Biocontrol 55, 493501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkaldy, GW (1902) XIV. Memoir upon the Rhynchotal family CapsidæAuctt. The Royal Entomological Society 50, 243272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, WH and Bronson, L (1981) Insect pests of tomatoes. Annual Review of Entomology 26, 345371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maleki, F, Ashouri, A, Mohaghegh, J and Bandani, A (2006) Effect of some diets on Macrolophus pygmaeus rambur (Hemiptera: Miridae) fitness under laboratory conditions. Communications in Agricultural Applied Biological Sciences 71, 393397.Google ScholarPubMed
Morales-Ramos, JA, Rojas, MG and Coudron, TA (2014) Artificial diet development for entomophagous arthropods. In Morales-Ramos, JA, Rojas, MG and Shapiro-Ilan, D (eds), Mass Production of Beneficial Organisms. Academic Press, Elsevier, pp. 203240. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-391453-8.00007-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perdikis, D and Arvaniti, K (2016) Nymphal development on plant vs. leaf with and without prey for two omnivorous predators: Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter, 1895) (Hemiptera: Miridae) and Dicyphus errans (Wolff, 1804) (Hemiptera: Miridae). Entomologia Generalis 35, 297306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Hedo, M and Urbaneja, A (2016) The zoophytophagous predator Nesidiocoris tenuis: a successful but controversial biocontrol agent in tomato crops. In Horowitz, A and Ishaaya, I (eds), Advances in Insect Control and Resistance Management. Cham: Springer, pp. 121138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polston, JE, De Barro, P and Boykin, LM (2014) Transmission specificities of plant viruses with the newly identified species of the Bemisia tabaci species complex. Pest Management Science 70, 15471552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Development Core Team (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Riudavets, J and Castañé, C (1998) Identification and evaluation of native predators of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in the Mediterranean. Environmental Entomology 27, 8693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, R (2003) Les régions climatiques de l’île de la Réunion: évolution des connaissances depuis quarante ans, 1958–1998. Saint-Denis, France: Université de la Réunion.Google Scholar
Ryckewaert, P and Alauzet, C (2002) The natural enemies of Bemisia argentifolii in Martinique. Biocontrol 47, 115126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, JA (2009) Density thresholds for Nesidiocoris tenuis (Heteroptera: Miridae) in tomato crops. Biological Control 51, 493498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez, J and Lacasa, A (2008) Impact of the zoophytophagous plant bug Nesidiocoris tenuis (Heteroptera: Miridae) on tomato yield. Journal of Economic Entomology 101, 18641871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchez, J, Lacasa, A, Arnó, J, Castane, C and Alomar, O (2009) Life history parameters for Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) (Het., Miridae) under different temperature regimes. Journal of Applied Entomology 133, 125132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, CW and Panizzi, AR (2000) Heteroptera of Economic Importance. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press LLC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, RT (2002–2013) On-line systematic catalog of plant bugs (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae) Available at: http://research.amnh.org/pbi/catalog.Google Scholar
Stiling, P and Cornelissen, T (2005) What makes a successful biocontrol agent? A meta-analysis of biological control agent performance. Biological Control 34, 236246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symondson, W, Sunderland, K and Greenstone, M (2002) Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? Annual Review of Entomology 47, 561594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ugine, TA, Krasnoff, SB, Grebenok, RJ, Behmer, ST and Losey, JE (2018) Prey nutrient content creates omnivores out of predators. Ecology Letters 22, 275283.Google ScholarPubMed
Uneke, CJ (2007) Integrated Pest Management for Developing Countries: A Systemic Overview. New York, NY, USA: Nova Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Urbaneja-Bernat, P, Mollá, O, Alonso, M, Bolkcmans, K, Urbaneja, A and Tena, A (2015) Sugars as complementary alternative food for the establishment of Nesidiocoris tenuis in greenhouse tomato. Journal of Applied Entomology 139, 161167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbaneja, A, Tapia, G and Stansly, P (2005) Influence of host plant and prey availability on developmental time and survivorship of Nesidiocoris tenius (Het.: Miridae). Biocontrol Science and Technology 15, 513518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbaneja, A, Montón, H and Mollá, O (2009) Suitability of the tomato borer Tuta absoluta as prey for Macrolophus pygmaeus and Nesidiocoris tenuis. Journal of Applied Entomology 133, 292296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lenteren, JC (2012) The state of commercial augmentative biological control: plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake. Biocontrol 57, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lenteren, JC, Bolckmans, K, Köhl, J, Ravensberg, WJ and Urbaneja, A (2018) Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: plenty of new opportunities. Biocontrol 63, 3959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, AG (2001) Biology of the Plant Bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae): Pests, Predators, Opportunists. New York, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Mean (SEM) development time (in days) for eggs and nymphs of Nesidiocoris volucer at various temperatures (in °C)

Figure 1

Table 2. Survival (S) in percentage at each stage of the nymph development, sex ratio in percentage (with binomial standard deviation), of Nesidiocoris volucer

Figure 2

Table 3. Mean (SEM) nymph development time (in days), survival of nymphs and longevity of adults (in days) of Nesidiocoris volucer feeding on several prey

Figure 3

Figure 1. Weekly number of eggs laid (hatched nymphs) by an initial number of 33 females of Nesidiocoris volucer followed until their death. The number of eggs is presented by a boxplot displaying the distribution of data based on a five number summary: minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile and maximum of values observed. Whiskers extend to the most extreme data point which is no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range from the box. ▴ indicates the absolute mean number of eggs per female each week (values given by the model prediction, including no random effect).

Figure 4

Figure 2. Percentage of elapsed time recorded during 20 min for each behaviour of females (1) and males (2) of Nesidiocoris volucer feeding on (a) Bemisia tabaci 4th–5th instar nymphs (nfemale = 16; nmale = 18), (b) Tetranychus sp. adults (nfemale = 20; nmale = 18), (c) Thrips parvispinus adults (nfemale = 14; nmale = 17) and (d) Trialeurodes vaporariorum 4th–5th instar nymphs (nfemale = 20; nmale = 20). The mean number of prey killed $\bar{n}_{{\rm prey}}$ (SEM) is indicated under each graph. For numbers of killed prey (transformed data), means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different from Tukey's all pair comparison test with Bonferroni-like correction (P = 0.05). For each prey tested, within a row, the symbol between the two graphs indicates if the mean number of killed prey by sex differ significantly (***) or not (NS) from deviance test (P = 0.05). Recorded behaviours were separated into four different classes, see material and methods section for more details.

Supplementary material: File

Marquereau et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Marquereau et al. supplementary material(File)
File 235.7 KB