Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:50:37.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Laboratory Study of the Cigarette Beetle, Lasioderma serricorne (F.) (Col., Anobiidae) with a critical Review of the Literature on its Biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. W. Howe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The paper includes a review of the published literature on the biology of the Cigarette Beetle, Lasioderma serricorne (F.). A list is given of foods on which this species has been found breeding. Information on the duration of the various developmental stages is tabulated and the data on oviposition are summarised. Observations are collected together on the rate of increase of the species in warehouses, on the number of generations per year, on sex ratio, on the use of traps to catch adults and on the spread of the pest and the damage that it causes. The lengths of exposure to various high and low temperatures that are required to give a complete kill of the species are tabulated, and the known natural enemies are listed.

Original work includes a morphological comparison of L. serricorne and the closely related common storage species Stegobium paniceum (L.). The experimental work consists of a study of the life-cycle of L. serricorne on wheatfeed over a wide range of combinations of constant temperature and humidity. Development was possible from just under 20°C. to 37·5°C. at favourable humidities. Larvae died at 90 per cent. R.H. at 37·5°C. The lower humidity level for development was under 25 per cent. R.H. at 30°C. but change of temperature, both up and down, raised the lower humidity limit so that, at 20°C. and 37·5°C., all larvae died at 40 per cent. R.H. When fed on foodstuffs such as groundnuts, which contain less water than wheatfeed at all humidities, the effects of low humidity are more rigorous. The effect of a number of foodstuffs on the length of the developmental cycle was investigated. The duration of larval instars on wheatfeed at 30°C. and 70 per cent. R.H. was found. The adults obtained in the experiments were weighed. The heaviest insects were obtained at 25°C. and 100 per cent. R.H. Higher temperatures and low humidities reduced weight. Females were heavier than males. The sex ratio was unity.

The oviposition rate was investigated at 70 per cent. R.H. over a wide temperature range. Under all conditions the eggs were laid quickly. At this relative humidity, no fertile eggs were laid at 37·5°C. and few pairs laid at 20°C. The total number of eggs laid per female at 20°C. was low, otherwise temperature had little effect on the number of eggs laid, but the rate of oviposition was increased by high temperature. The theoretical rate of increase at 70 per cent. R.H. was calculated for several temperatures and shown to increase with temperature up to 35°C.

The conclusions on the distribution and multiplication of the species which can be drawn from the laboratory results are discussed.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 1957 , pp. 9 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1929). Department of Entomology and Zoology.—Bull. tech. Serv. Dep. Agric. Haiti, no. 17 (Ann. Rep. 1928–1929), pp. 157–166.Google Scholar
Anon. (1946). Two beetle pests (Ptinidae) of stored foodstuffs.—Agric. Gaz. N.S.W., 57, pp. 36–37.Google Scholar
Alfieri, A. (1931). Les insectes de la tombe de Touthankhamon.—Bull. Soc. R. ent, Egypte, 15, pp. 188–189.Google Scholar
D'angremond, A. (1919). Onderzoekingen over het dooden van Lasioderma serricorne Fabr. in tabak, door middel van 1° verhitting, 2° benzine.—Meded. Proefst. vorstenl. Tabak, no. 36, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Annand, P. N. (1942 a). Report of the Chief of the Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, 1941.—120 pp. Washington, D.C., U.S. Dep. Agric.Google Scholar
Annand, P. N. (1942 b). Report of the Chief of the Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, 1942.—60 pp. Washington, D.C., U.S. Dep. Agric.Google Scholar
Appert, J. (1953). Les insectes nuisibles au riz.—Bull. Cent. Rech. agron. Bambey, no. 8, pp. 52–60.Google Scholar
Atkinson, G. F. (1886). The Cigarette Beetle (Lasioderma serricorne Fab.).—J. Elisha Mitchell sci. Soc., 3, pp. 68–73.Google Scholar
Back, E. A. (1939 a). A new pest of books, Neogastrallus librinocens Fisher.—J. econ. Ent., 32, pp. 642–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Back, E. A. (1939 b). The Cigarette Beetle as a pest of cottonseed meal.—J. econ. Ent., 32, pp. 739–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Back, E. A. & Cotton, R. T. (1924). Effective use of hydrocyanic-acid gas in the protection of chick-peas (Cicer arietinum) warehoused in 240-pound sacks.—J. agric. Res., 28, pp. 649–660.Google Scholar
Back, E. A. & Cotton, R. T. (1926). The Cadelle.—Dep. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., no. 1428, 41 pp.Google Scholar
Back, E. A. & Cotton, R. T. (1930). Insect pests of upholstered furniture.—J. econ. Ent., 23, pp. 833–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Back, E. A. & Cotton, R. T. (1940). Stored-grain pests.—Fmrs' Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., no. 1260 (revd.), 46 pp.Google Scholar
Banks, N. (1917). New mites, mostly economic (Arach. Acar.).—Ent. News, 28, pp. 193–199.Google Scholar
Bare, C. O. (1942). Some natural enemies of stored-tobacco insects, with biological notes.—J. econ. Ent., 35, pp. 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bare, C. O., Tenhet, J. N. & Brubaker, R. W. (1947). Improved techniques for mass rearing of the Cigarette Beetle and the Tobacco Moth.—U.S. Dep. Agric. Bur. Ent., ET-247, 11 pp. multigraph.Google Scholar
Bare, C. O., Tenhet, J. N. & Reed, W. D. (1946). Effect of the thermal-vacuum process on insects in stored tobacco.—J. econ. Ent., 39, pp. 612–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bissell, T. L. (1935). Insects infesting cottonseed meal.—J. econ. Ent., 28, p. 835.Google Scholar
Bissell, T. L. & Du Pree, M. (1946). Insects in shelled peanuts in relation to storage and bagging.—J. econ. Ent., 39, pp. 550–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
B[odkin], G. E. (1914). Entomological notes.—J. Bd Agric. Brit. Guiana, 7, pp. 200–202.Google Scholar
Bodkin, G. E. (1919). Notes on the Coleoptera of British Guiana.—Ent. mon. Mag., 55, pp. 264–272.Google Scholar
Bondar, G. (1942). As cêras no Brasil eo licuri Cocos coronata Mart, na Bahia. —Bol. Inst. cent. Fom. econ. Bahia, no. 11, 86 pp.Google Scholar
Böving, A. G. (1927). The larva of Nevermannia dorcatomoides Fisher with comments on the classification of the Anobiidae according to their larvae (Coleoptera: Anobiidae).—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash., 29, pp. 51–62.Google Scholar
Böving, A. G. (1954). Mature larvae of the beetle-family Anobiidae.—Biol. Medd., 22, no. 2, 298 pp.Google Scholar
Bovingdon, H. H. S. (1931). Pests in cured tobacco. The Tobacco Beetle … and the Cacao Moth ….—Tobacco, London, 1st Aug. 1931, repr. 4 pp.Google Scholar
Bovingdon, H. H. S. (1933). Report on the infestation of cured tobacco in London by the Cacao Moth Ephestia elutella Hb.—Rep. Emp. Mktg Bd, no. 67, 88 pp.Google Scholar
Brannon, L. W. & Reed, W. D. (1943). Survey of tobacco carriers for stored-tobacco insects.—J. econ. Ent., 36, pp. 295–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, W. E. (1920). Nineteenth report of the State Entomologist of Connecticut for the year 1919.—Bull. Conn, agric. Exp. Sta., no. 218, pp. 111–208.Google Scholar
Brubaker, R. W. & Pollard, H. N. (1941). Determining the catches of Cigarette Beetles and Tobacco Moths made in insect traps.—U.S. Dep. Agric. Bur. Ent., ET-186, 4 pp. multigraph.Google Scholar
De Bussy, L. P. (1917 a). Voorschrift voor het bewaren van afgepakte tabak met het oog op Lasioderma en tabaksmot.—Meded. Deli Proefst., 10, p. 127.Google Scholar
De Bussy, L. P. (1917 b). Lasioderma in Deli en zijn Bestrijding.—Meded. Deli Proefst., 10, pp. 129–160.Google Scholar
Candura, G. S. (1932). Contributo alla conoscenza morfologica e biologica dello struggigrano (Tenebroides mauritanicus L.).—Boll. Lab. Zool. Portici, 27, pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
Canzanelli, A. (1935). Contributo alla embriologia e biologia del tarlo del tabacco (Lasioderma serricorne Fabricius).—Boll. Lab. Zool. agr. Bachic., 4, fasc. 2, pp. 81–116.Google Scholar
Carloni, M. (1950). Ephestia elutella.—Tabacco, Rome, 54, pp. 321–326. (Translation by Baumann, L. L..)Google Scholar
Chittenden, F. H. (1896). Insects affecting cereals and other dry vegetable foods.—Bull. U.S. Div. Ent., (N.S.) no. 4, pp. 112–131.Google Scholar
Chorley, J. K. (1944). Report of the Acting Chief Entomologist [Southern Rhodesia] for the year ending 31st December, 1943.—17 pp. typescript.Google Scholar
Del Cid, G. (1934). Book-attacking insects in Cataluña.—Arx. Esc. Agric. Barcelona, (N.S.) no.1, pp. 24–30. [In Catalan with English summary.]Google Scholar
C[orbett], G. H. (1931). Entomological notes. First quarter 1931.—Malay, agric. J., 19, pp. 194–196.Google Scholar
Cotes, E. C. (1894). Miscellaneous notes from the Entomological Section. Cheroot borer.—Indian Mus. Notes, 3, no. 5 pp. 44–46.Google Scholar
Cotterell, G. S. (1952). The insects associated with export produce in southern Nigeria.—Bull. ent. Res., 43, pp. 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotton, R. T. (1923). Aplastomorpha vandinei Tucker, an important parasite of Sitophilus oryza L.—J. agric. Res., 23, pp. 549–556.Google Scholar
Cressman, A. W. (1933). Control of an infestation of the Cigarette Beetle in a library by the use of heat.—J. econ. Ent., 26, pp. 294–295.Google Scholar
Crumb, S. E. & Chamberlin, F. S. (1934). The effect of cool temperatures on some stages of the Cigarette Beetle.—Florida Ent., 18, pp. 11–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, R. A. (1947). Notes on stored product pests in Burma and Singapore.—Entomologist, 80, pp. 36–40.Google Scholar
Delassus, M. & Lepigre, A. (1931). Les efforts faits par les manufacturiers algériens pour assurer la protection des tabacs d'exportation.—Afr. N. illus., Suppl. Afr. N. agric., no. 544, pp. 3–5; no. 546, pp. 3–5.Google Scholar
Diakonoff, A. & De Boer, S. (1938). Bestrijding van schadelijke voor-raad-insecten door middel van koelen.—Ber. HandMus. kolon. Inst. Amst., no. 120, 20 pp.Google Scholar
Dick, J. (1937). Oviposition in certain Coleoptera.—Ann. appl. Biol., 24, pp. 762–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doane, R. W. (1925). Feeding cows insect-infested cocoanut meal.—J. econ. Ent., 18, pp. 689–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Den Doop, J. E. A. (1917). Lasioderma en Anobium in koriander- en karweizaden.—Meded. Deli Proefst., 10, pp. 190–202.Google Scholar
Den Doop, J. E. A. (1919). Aanteekeningen over de Lasioderma bestrijding.—Meded. Deli Proefst., (2) no. 3, pp. 7–18.Google Scholar
Duport, L. (1919). Rapport à Monsieur le Président de la Chambre d'Agriculture sur les recherches poursuivies à la Station Entoniologique de Cho-Ganh. —Bull. Chamb. Agric. Tonkin, no. 124 (suppl. no. 6), 10 pp.Google Scholar
Ehrhorn, E. M. (1923). Report of Chief Plant Inspector, February and March 1923.—Hawaii. For. Agric., 20, pp. 63–67.Google Scholar
Van Emden, F. (1925). Bericht über die entomologische Überwachung der Speicher und Kulturen der Firma Caesar & Loretz, A.-G. im Jahre 1923. —Jber. Caesar & Loretz, Halle (Saale), 1924, pp. 167–232.Google Scholar
Van Emden, F. (1929). Ueber die Rolle der Feuchtigkeit im Leben der Speicher schädlinge.—Anz. Schädlingsk., 5, pp. 58–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Emden, F. (1931). Zur Kenntnis der Morphologie und Ökologie des Brotkäfer-Parasiten Cephalonomia quadridentata Duchaussoy.—Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere, 23, pp. 425–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Essig, E. O. (1921). Some interesting economic insects recently observed in California.—Mon. Bull. Calif. Dep. Agric., 10, pp. 140–143.Google Scholar
Fauvel, A. (1889). Liste des Coléoptères communs à l'Europe et à l'Amérique du Nord [et premier supplément].—Rev. Ent., Caen, 8, pp. 92–174.Google Scholar
Fletcher, T. B. & Ghosh, C. C. (1920). Stored grain pests.—Proc. 3rd ent. Mtg Pusa, 2, pp. 712–761.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, G. & Blewett, M. (1943 a). The natural foods and the food requirements of several species of stored products insects.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., 93, pp. 457–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, G. & Blewett, M. (1943 b). The basic food requirements of several insects.—J. exp. Biol., 20, pp. 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, G. & Blewett, M. (1943 c). Intracellular symbionts of insects as a source of vitamins.—Nature, Lond., 152, pp. 506–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, G. & Blewett, M. (1943 d). The sterol requirements of several insects. —Biochem. J., 37, pp. 692–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, J. A. (1948). World foci of infestation and principal channels of dissemination to other points, with suggestions for detection and standards of inspection. In Easter, S. S.Ed. Preservation of grains in storage. —FAO agric. Stud., no. 2, pp. 15–34.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. A. (1950). Methods of spread of stored products insects and origin of infestation in stored products.—Proc. 8th int. Congr. Ent., pp. 815–825.Google Scholar
Fullaway, D. T. (1914). Tobacco insects in Hawaii.—Bull. Hawaii agric. Exp. Sta., no. 34, 20 pp.Google Scholar
Ghimpu, V. (1935). Insectele dăunătoare tutunului depozitat şi combaterea lor. —Bul. Cult. Ferment. Tutun., 24, pp. 269–293.Google Scholar
Golding, F. D. (1941). Two new methods of trapping the Cacao Moth (Ephestia cautella).—Bull. ent. Res., 32, pp. 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowdey, C. C. (1923). The principal insect pests of tobacco in Jamaica.—Ent. Circ. Dep. Agric. Jamaica, no. 9, 6 pp.Google Scholar
Gowdey, C. C. (1927). Report of the Government Entomologist.—Rep. Dep. Agric. Jamaica, 1926, pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, E. (1926). Report of the Entomological Section.—Rep. Lds For. Dep. Sierra Leone, 1925, pp. 16–18.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (1939). Entomologist's report 1938.—Ent. Leafl. Dep. Agric. Tanganyika, no. 17, 5 pp.Google Scholar
Hayward, L. A. W. (1954). The origins of infestations of cocoa by Tobacco Beetle in Nigeria.—Emp. J. exp. Agric., 22, pp. 133–137.Google Scholar
Herford, G. M. (1939). Common pests of grain godowns in Hong Kong.—Hong Kong Nat., 9, pp. 102–107.Google Scholar
Howe, R. W. (1949). Studies on beetles of the family Ptinidae, 2. Fineness of foodstuffs as a factor influencing the rate of development of Ptinus tectus Boield.—Ent. mon. Mag., 85, pp. 189–190.Google Scholar
Howe, R. W. (1952). Entomological problems of food storage in northern Nigeria.—Bull. ent. Res., 43, pp. 111–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, R. W. (1953). The rapid determination of the intrinsic rate of increase of an insect population.—Ann. appl. Biol., 40, pp. 134–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, R. W. & Burges, H. D. (1953). Studies on beetles of the family Ptinidae. IX. A laboratory study of the biology of Ptinus tectus Boield.—Bull, ent. Res., 44, pp. 461–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, R. W. & Freeman, J. A. (1955). Insect infestation of West African produce imported into Britain.—Bull. ent. Res., 46, pp. 643–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, R. W. (1938). Annual report of the Division of Entomology for the year ended 31st December, 1937. Agriculture.—Rhod. agric. J., 35, pp. 652–659.Google Scholar
Jensen, H. (1917). Lasioderma en Tabaksmot.—Meded. Proefst. vorstenl. Tabak. no. 30, 29 pp.Google Scholar
Jepson, F. P. (1935). Report on the work of the Entomological Division, 1934.—Adm. Rep. Dir. Agric. Ceylon, 1934, pp. D132–D147.Google Scholar
Jepson, W. F. (1939 a). Entomological Division.—Rep. Dep. Agric. Mauritius, 1937, pp. 41–46.Google Scholar
Jepson, W. F. (1939 b). Entomological Division.—Rep. Dep. Agric. Mauritius, 1938, pp. 40–51.Google Scholar
Jones, C. R. (1913). The Cigarette Beetle (Lasioderma serricorne, Fabr.) in the Philippine Islands.—Philipp. J. Sci., (D) 8, pp. 1–42.Google Scholar
Kalshoven, L. G. E. (1938). De boekenworm in Nederlandsch-Iudië.—Ent. Meded. Ned.-Ind., 4, pp. 10–16.Google Scholar
Kearns, C. W. (1934). A Hymenopterous parasite (Cephalonomia gallicola Ashm.) new to the Cigarette Beetle (Lasioderma serricorne Fab.).—J. econ. Ent., 27, pp. 801–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keuchenius, P. E. (1917). Waarnemingen over ziekten en plagen bij tabak (derde serie). De tabaksboeboek (Lasioderma) en de tabaksmot (Setomorpha).—Meded. besoek. Proefst., no. 26, 56 pp.Google Scholar
Lever, R. J. A. W. (1941). Entomological notes.—Agric. J. Fiji, 12, pp. 19–22.Google Scholar
Lever, R. J. A. W. (1944). Division of Entomology. Annual report for the year 1943.—Agric. J. Fiji, 15, pp. 73–75.Google Scholar
Lever, R. J. A. W. (1945). Entomological notes.—Agric. J. Fiji, 16, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar
Lin, S., Hodson, A. C. & Richards, A. G. (1954). An analysis of threshold temperatures for the development of Oncopeltus and Tribolium eggs.—Physiol. Zoöl., 27, pp. 287–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linsley, E. G. (1944). Protection of dried packaged foodstuffs from insect damage.—J. econ. Ent., 37, pp. 377–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, E. M. & Reed, W. D. (1936). Insect fauna of cured tobacco in storage in the United States.—J. econ. Ent., 29, pp. 1017–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, D. B. (1911). The Tobacco Beetle and a method for its control (Lasioderma spp.).—Philipp. agric. Rev., 4, pp. 606–612.Google Scholar
Mackie, D. B. (1917). Some causes of the failure of the Manila cigar on the United States market and a remedy.—Philipp. agric. Rev., 10, pp. 223–252.Google Scholar
Macnay, C. G. (1953). Household and stored product insects.—Canad. Ins. Pest. Rev., 31, pp. 275–278.Google Scholar
Madel, W. (1938). Drogenschädlinge, ihre Erkennung und Bekämpfung.—96 pp. Berlin, Dtsch. Apotheker-Verlag.Google Scholar
Madel, W. (1939). Drogenschädlinge.—Verh. 7. int. Kongr. Ent., 4, pp. 2856–2862.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, G. H. (1936). A note on the resistance to prolonged cold of some insect pests of stored products.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond., (A) 11, pp. 83–86.Google Scholar
Manton, S. M. (1945). The larvae of the Ptinidae associated with stored products.—Bull. ent. Res., 35, pp. 341–365.Google Scholar
Maskew, F. (1919). Quarantine Division. Report for the month of April 1919. —Mon. Bull. Calif. Comm. Hort., 8, pp. 309–311.Google Scholar
Maskew, F. (1920). Quarantine Division. Report for the month of August 1920.—Mon. Bull. Calif. Dep. Agric., 9, pp. 390–392.Google Scholar
Melia, M., Melia, G. & Lepigre, A. L. (1934). Sur la piqûre des cigarettes et des cigares.—Rev. int. Tabacs, 19, pp. 5–24.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1922). Insect notes: 1921–22 season.—N. Z. J. Agric., 24, pp. 294–296.Google Scholar
Mokrzhetzki, S. (1925). Xylctinus (Lasioderma) serricorne F., Tobacco Beetle in Bulgaria. [In Bulgarian with German summary.]—Mitt. bulg. ent. Ges., 2, pp. 64–66.Google Scholar
Montgomery, J. H. & Bragdon, K. E. (1919). Quarantine Department.—Quart. Bull. Fla Pl. Bd, 3, pp. 110–112.Google Scholar
Moreira, C. (1923). Os insectos damninhos. XXVII. A lagarto do fumo, Protoparce paphus, Cram, e o besourinho dos charutos, Lasioderma serricorne, Fab.—Chacaras e Quint., 27, pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
Morgan, A. C. (1913). An enemy of the Cigarette Beetle.—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash., 15, p. 89.Google Scholar
Morgan, A. C. & Crumb, S. E. (1928). Notes on the chemotropic responses of certain insects.—J. econ. Ent., 21, pp. 913–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, H. M. (1938). Annual report of the Entomologist for 1937.—Rep. Dep. Agric. Cyprus, 1937, pp. 42–47.Google Scholar
Mossop, M. C. (1932). Pests of stored tobacco in Southern Rhodesia.—Rhod. agric. J., 29, pp. 245–265.Google Scholar
Mossop, M. C. (1937). Some tobacco Pests that can be serious.—Rhod. agric. J., 34, pp. 606–611.Google Scholar
Mossop, M. C. (1949). D.D.T. for tobacco warehouses and store-rooms.—Rhod. agric. J., 46, pp. 73–78.Google Scholar
Mossop, M. C. (1950). Summary of annual report of the Chief Entomologist for the year ended 31st December, 1949.—Rhod. agric. J., 47, pp. 331–338.Google Scholar
Nicol, J. M. (1941). Insect infestation of cacao beans in the producing countries with a note on the extent to which Ephestia elutella Hub. and E. cautella Wlk. establish themselves in warehouses and factories in Great Britain. —Bull. imp. Inst., 39, pp. 17–25.Google Scholar
Pant, N. C. & Fraenkel, G. (1950). The function of the symbiotic yeasts of two insect species, Lasioderma serricorne F. and Stegobium (Sitodrepa) paniceum L.—Science, New York, 112, pp. 498–500.Google Scholar
Passmore, F. R. (1932). A survey of damage by insects and moulds to West African cacao before storage in Europe. Season 1930–31.—Bull. imp. Inst., 30, pp. 296–305.Google Scholar
Poock, G. (1910). Die Anwendung von Kälte zur Vernichtung des Tabakwurms. —Chemikerztg, 34, p. 1127.Google Scholar
Porta, A. (1929). Fauna Coleopterorum Italica. Vol. III. Diversicornia.—466 pp. Piacenza.Google Scholar
Powell, T. E. jr (1931). An ecological study of the Tobacco Beetle, Lasioderma serricorne Fabr., with special reference to its life history and control.—Ecol. Monogr., 1, pp. 333–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayment, T. (1935). A cluster of bees.—752 pp. Sydney, Endeavour Press.Google Scholar
Reed, W. D. (1935). Notes on the distribution of cured tobacco insects in the Near East.—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash., 37, pp. 42–48.Google Scholar
Reed, W. D., Brubaker, R. W. & Pollard, H. N. (1941). Hogshead construction as a barrier to stored-tobacco insects.—J. econ. Ent., 34, pp. 724–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, W. D., Morrill, A. W. jr & Livingstone, E. M. (1934). Experiments with suction light traps for combating the Cigarette Beetle.—J. econ. Ent., 27, pp. 796–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, W. D., Morrill, A. W. jr & Livingstone, E. M. (1935). Trapping experiments for the control of the Cigarette Beetle.—Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric., no. 356, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Richards, O. W. (1952). A new species of Bethylidae (Hymenoptera) from Palestine.—Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., (12), 5, pp.409–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, O. W. & Herford, G. V. B. (1930). Insects found associated with cacao, spices and dried fruits in London warehouses.—Ann. appl. Biol., 17, pp. 367–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, J. (1957). A survey of the build-up of infestation in bagged cocoa beans. —Bull. ent. Res., 48, pp. 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risbec, J. [1941]. Les insectes de l'arachide.—Trav. Lab. Ent. Sect, soudan. Rech. agron., 21 pp. (Rev. appl. Ent., (A) 36, p. 44.)Google Scholar
Runner, G. A. (1919). The Tobacco Beetle: an important pest in tobacco products.—Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., no. 737, 77 pp.Google Scholar
Saraiva, A. C. (1939). A preliminary list of the insect pests of crops and fruit trees in Portuguese East Africa.—J. ent. Soc. S. Afr., 2, pp. 101–114.Google Scholar
Van Schreven, D. A. (1948). Onderzoekingen met betrakking tot enkele plagen en ziekten van Vorstenlandse tabak.—Tijdschr. PlZiekt., 54, pp. 149–174.Google Scholar
Schwarz, E. A. (1883). Insects affecting drugs.—Canad. Ent., 15, p. 140.Google Scholar
Shepard, H. H. (1943). Rearing insects that attack stored products. [In] Campbell, F. L. & Moulton, F. R.Ed. Laboratory procedures in studies of the chemical control of insects.—Publ. Amer. Ass. Advanc. Sci., no. 20, pp. 36–51.Google Scholar
Sheppard, R. A. (1926). Insect pests imported on miscellaneous plant products. —56th Rep. ent. Soc. Ont., 1925, pp. 50–54.Google Scholar
Shibuya, S. & Yamada, S. (1935). Life history of Lasioderma serricorne, Fab., injuring dried gingers (preliminary report), [In Japanese.]—Oyo-Dobuts. Zasshi, 7, pp. 104–106. (R.A.E., (A) 23, p. 514.)Google Scholar
Skalov, Yu. Yu. (1931). The biological cycle of Tobacco Beetle (Lasioderma serricorne F.) under the conditions of fermentative factories and the influence of temperature variations on the activity of the insect. [In Russian, with English summary.]—Bull. Inst. Tob. Invest., Crimean Sect., no. 80, 16 pp.Google Scholar
Smee, C. (1923). Tobacco Beetle.—Circ. Dep. Agric. Nyasaland, no. 4 (1923), 7 pp.Google Scholar
Smee, C. [1930]. Report of the Entomological Division.—Rep. Dep. Agric. Nyasaland, 1929, pp. 13–21.Google Scholar
Smee, C. [1945]. Report of the Entomologist (Nyasaland) 1944.—5 pp. typescript.Google Scholar
Solomon, M. E. (1951). Control of humidity with potassium hydroxide, sulphuric acid, or other solutions.—Bull. ent. Res., 42, pp. 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, M. E. & Adamson, B. E. (1955). The powers of survival of storage and domestic pests under winter conditions in Britain.—Bull. ent. Res., 46, pp. 311–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamatinis, N. C. (1935). The enemies of tobacco in warehouses, Ephestia elutella Hb. and Lasioderma serricorne Fab. The biology and measures for their control. [In Greek with English summary.]—Commun. Tob. Inst. Greece, no. 4, 65 pp.Google Scholar
Strong, L. A. (1920). Quarantine Service. Report for the month of October 1920.—Mon. Bull. Calif. Dep. Agric., 9, pp. 724–727.Google Scholar
Strong, L. A. (1922). The Bureau of Plant Quarantine. Synopsis of work for the months of September and October 1921.—Mon. Bull. Calif. Dep. Agric., 11, pp. 67–72.Google Scholar
Strong, L. A. (1936). Report of the Chief of the Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, 1936.—121 pp. Washington, D.C., U.S. Dep. Agric.Google Scholar
Swingle, M. C. (1938). Low temperature as a possible means of controlling the Cigarette Beetle in stored tobacco.—Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 462, 8 pp.Google Scholar
Tenhet, J. N. (1955). Timing of sprays to control the Cigarette Beetle.—U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Mktg Serv., AMS-49, 6 pp.Google Scholar
Tenhet, J. N. & Bare, C. O. (1951). Control of insects in stored and manufactured tobacco.—Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric., no. 869, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Theobald, F. V. (1911). Report on ecomonic zoology for the year ending September 30th, 1911. Animals injurious to man's buildings, furniture, stores and food.—J.S.-E. agric. Coll. Wye, no. 20, pp. 226–237.Google Scholar
Thillard, R. (1921). La culture du tabac de Sumatra au Cameroun.—Agron. colon., 6, pp. 23–40.Google Scholar
Tirumalarao, V. & Nagarajarao, K. R. (1955). A note on the control of Lasioderma serricorne Fab.—a pest of stored dry ginger. Indian J. Ent., 16, pp. 416–418.Google Scholar
Tucker, R. W. E. (1934). Insects in houses in Barbados.—J. Barbados Mus., 1, pp. 73–79.Google Scholar
Ustinov, A. A. (1932). A review of the pests of tobacco in Abkhazia observed in 1931. [In Russian.]—38 pp. Sukhum, Abkhazsk. tabach. zonal'n. Sta.Google Scholar
Van Der Veen, R. (1940). Enkele proeven met Lasiodcrma serricorne Fabr. in verband met de wijze van opslaan van tabak.—Meded. besoek. Proefst., no. 66, pp. 31–42.Google Scholar
Veth, H. J. & Van Rijn, W. (1915). Eenige mededeelingen over de Lasioderma-plaag en hare bestrijding.—48 pp. Djember, Besoek. Proefst.Google Scholar
Vinzant, J. P. & Reed, W. D. (1941). Type of wire screen required for excluding Cigarette Beetles and Tobacco Moths from warehouses.—J. econ. Ent., 34, p. 724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, F. N. & others (1926). Report of the Division of Entomology.—7th Rep. Ind. Dep. Conserv., 1924–25, pp. 33–61.Google Scholar
Wille, J. (1931). Lasioderma serricorne F. als Schädling an Baumwollsamen.—Anz. Schädlingsk., 7, pp. 110–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wille, J. (1934). Ueber einige Vorrats- und Speicherschädlinge in Peru.—Mitt. Ges. Vorratsschutz, 10, pp. 4–8.Google Scholar
Wille, J. (1940). Departamento de Entomologia. Memoria del Jefe del Departamento [Año 1939].—Mem. Estac. exp. agric. La Molina, no. 12, pp. 177–210.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. F. (1931). Insects associated with the seeds of garden plants.—J.R. hort. Soc., 56, pp. 31–47.Google Scholar
Zacher, F. (1927). Die Vorrats-, Speicher- und Materialschädlinge und ihre Bekämpfung.—366 pp. Berlin, Parey.Google Scholar
Zeck, E. H. (1943). Pests of dried fruits.—Agric. Gaz. N.S.W., 54, pp. 67–71.Google Scholar