Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:19:01.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory studies on aggregation, size and fecundity in the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae Scop.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A. F. G. Dixon  and
S. D. Wratten
A. F. G. Dixon
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The University, Glasgow, W2
S. D. Wratten
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The University, Glasgow, W2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Adults of Aphis fabae Scop. can weigh from as little as 200 μg to as much as 1 800 μg (Way & Banks, 1967), a remarkable range in size for a single species. An extensive range in size also occurs among the adults in other species of aphid (Murdie, 1969a, b; Dixon, 1970). Small individuals result when aphids develop either under crowded conditions or on a mature host-plant; large aphids result when the nymphs are reared in isolation or on young or senescent host-plants (Way & Banks, 1967; Murdie, 1969a, b; Dixon, 1970). A small adult produces fewer nymphs and also smaller nymphs than average (Murdie, 1969b; Dixon, 1970). When aphids are overcrowded or feed on host-plants of poor quality, many aphids reach maturity that might otherwise fail to mature because of the ability of the species to produce viable adults of a great variety of size, including very small adults (Way & Banks, 1967).

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , October 1971 , pp. 97 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, C. J. & Macaulay, E. D. M. (1964). The feeding, growth and reproduction of Aphis fabae Scop. on Vicia faba under experimental conditions.—Ann. appl. Biol. 53, 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, L. C. (1948). The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population.—J. Anim. Ecol. 17, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G. (1969). Population dynamics of the sycamore aphid Drepanosiphum platanoides (Schr.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae): migratory and trivial flight activity.—J. Anim. Ecol. 38, 585–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G. (1970). Quality and availability of food for a sycamore aphid population. In Watson, A.. Ed. Animal populations in relation to their food resources [British Ecological Society Symposium no. 10], 271–287. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G., Burns, M. D. & Wangboonkong, S. (1968). Migration in aphids: response to current adversity.—Nature, Lond. 220, 1337–1338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forrest, J. M. S. (1971). The nutritional advantage of galling to Dysaphis devecta.—Entomologia exp. appl. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, J. M. S. & Noordink, J. P. W. (1971). Translocation and subsequent uptake by aphids of 32P introduced into plants by radioactive aphids.—Entomologia exp. appl. 14, 133–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. G. (1969). Migration and dispersal of insects by flight.—763 pp. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. S. (1954). Host alternation in Aphis fabae Scop. II. Changes in the aphids.—Ann. appl. Blot. 41, 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, K. P., Ehrhardt, P. & Moericke, V. (1967). Labelling of aphid saliva with Rubidium-86.—Nature, Lond. 214, 602–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mordvilko, A. (1928). The evolution of cycles and the origin of heteroecy (migrations) in plant-lice.—Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (10) 2, 570–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, H. J. (1966). Über die Ursachen der Unterschiedlichen Resistenz von Vicia faba L. gegenüber der Bohnen-Blattlaus Aphis (Doralis) fabae Scop. IX. Der Einfluss ökologischer Faktoren auf das Wachstum von Aphis fabae Scop.—Entomologia exp. appl. 9, 42–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdie, G. (1969 a). Some causes of size variation in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 121, 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdie, G. (1969 b). The biological consequences of decreased size caused by crowding or rearing temperatures in apterae of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 121, 443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, M. D. (1958). A simplified clip cage for aphid investigations.—Can. Ent. 90, 760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SchÄller, G. (1968). Biochemische Analyse des Aphidenspeichels und seine Bedeutung für die Gallenbildung.—Zool. lb. Physiol. 74, 54–87.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. J. P. (1967). The flight behaviour of alate Aphis fabae.—Rep. Rothamsted exp. Stn. 1966, 200–201.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. J. P. (1970 a). Effects of population density on alienicolae of Aphis fabae Scop. II. The effects of crowding on the expression of migratory urge among alatae in the laboratory.—Ann. appl. Biol. 65, 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, M. J. P. (1970 b). Effects of population density on alienicolae of Aphis fabae Scop.III. The effect of isolation on the development of form and behaviour of alatae in a laboratory clone.—Ann. appl. Biol. 65, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical methods applied to experiments in agriculture and biology.—5th edn, 534 pp. Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Way, M. J. & Banks, C. J. (1967). Intra-specific mechanisms in relation to the natural regula tion of numbers of Aphis fabae Scop.—Ann. appl. Biol. 59, 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, M. J. & Cammell, M. (1970). Aggregation behaviour in relation to food utilization by aphids. In Watson, A. Ed. Animal populations in relation to their food resources [Ecological Society Symposium no. 10] 229–247. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar