Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:07:47.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laboratory evaluation of sulphur-bearing chemicals as attractants for larvae of the onion fly, Delia antiqua (Meigen) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

S. K. Soni
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF, UK.
S Finch
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF, UK.

Abstract

A laboratory method was developed to evaluate the effectiveness of volatile sulphur-bearing chemicals as attraotants for newly hatched larvae of Delia antiqua (Mg.). The 27 chemicals evaluated included mono-, di-and trisulphides, mercaptans, thiosulphinates, thiosulphonates, thiopropanal S-oxide and ‘onion oil’ (a complex mixture of volatiles). Larvae were placed in the centre of a petri dish and chemicals were presented either in glass tubes or on white absorbent discs 6 mm in diameter. One tube or disc contained 10 000, 1000, 100, 10, 1 or 0·1 nl of the test chemical and the other a similar amount of diethyl ether. The solvent did not attract the larvae and was used to dispense 0·1–100 nl amounts of the test chemicals. Most of the chemicals tested were unattractive at 0·1 nl and repellent at 10 000 nl. At the intermediate amounts, all attracted at least 40% of the larvae and 13 attracted more than 80%. Onion oil at 1 nl and methyl trisulphide at 10 nl elicited the greatest response, attracting 95% of the larvae. A possible method is suggested for using these chemicals in the field to attract newly hatched larvae away from onion seedlings.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1978). Growing early bulb onions. — Wellesbourne, Warwick, National Vegetable Research Station. (Practical Guide no. 2).Google Scholar
Boelens, M., de Valois, P. J., Wobben, H. J., Van der Gen, A.. (1971). Volatile flavour compounds from onion. — J. Agric. Fd Chem. 19, 984991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodnitz, M. H., Pollock, C. L., Vallon, P. P.. (1969). Flavour components of onion oil. — J. Agric. Fd Chem. 17, 760763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, J. F.. & Wong, F. F.. (1961). The volatile flavour components of onions. — J. Agric Fd Chem. 9, 140143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, S.. (1976). Effect of secondary plant substances on host-plant selection by the cabbage root fly, pp. 251267in Comportement des Insectes et Milieu Trophique. — Collogues int. Cent. natn. Rech. scient. no 265.Google Scholar
Finch, S.. & Skinner, G.. (1974). Studies on the cabbage root fly: chemicals influencing behaviour; evaluation of attractants. — Rep. natn. Veg. Res. Stn 1973, 8485.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. G.. & Whenham, R. J.. (1976). Nature and origin of volatile flavour components of onion and related species. — International Flavours (Sept.–Oct. 1976 issue).Google Scholar
Gostick, K. G.., Powell, D. F., Slough, C.. (1971). Dieldrin resistant onion fly (Delia antiqua (Meig.)) in England. — Pl. Path. 20, 6365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. R.. & Svec, H. J.. (1976). Onion maggot resistance to insecticides. — J. econ. Ent. 59, 617620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Y.. & Thorsteinson, A. J.. (1968). Olfactory response of larvae of the onion maggot, Hylemya antiqua Meigen (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) to organic sulphur compounds. — A ppl. Ent. Zool. 3, 107111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, P. J.. (1975). Early production of bulb onions from overwintered crops in the United Kingdom. — ADAS q. Rev. no 19, 101108.Google Scholar
Soni, S. K.., Finch, S., Whenham, R. J.. (1978). Studies on pest biology: onion fly; oviposition preference. — Rep. natn. Veg. Res. Stn. 1977 (1978), p. 80.Google Scholar