Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:11:15.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inversion polymorphism and circadian flight activity in the mosquito Anopheles stephensi List. (Diptera, Culicidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. D. R. Jones
M. D. R. Jones
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Circadian flight activity in Anopheles stephensi List. has been investigated using the acoustic aotograph technique. In alternating 12 h light: 12 h dark (50 or 200 lx), both sexes are active during the dark period, with peaks of activity following light-off and light-on. Cyclical activity persists in constant dark and is inhibited and reset by prolonging the light period. There are small differences between the carriers of the alternative chromosomal arrangements 2R+ ( +/+) and 2Rb (b/b) and between the sexes. In +/+ females the period of the cycle in constant dark is approximately half-an-hour longer and, in LD 12:12, there is less activity at light-on than in both sexes of b/b or in +/+ males. The +/+ males appear to be less susceptible to the inhibitory effect of prolonging the light period, although the cycle is reset.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , October 1974 , pp. 305 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coluzzi, M. (1970). Sibling species in Anopheles and their importance in malariology.—Misc. Publs ent. Soc. Am. 7, 63–77.Google Scholar
Coluzzi, M. (1972). Inversion polymorphism and adult emergence in Anopheles stephensi.—Science, N.Y. 176, 59–60.Google Scholar
Coluzzi, M., di Deco, M. & Cancrini, G. (1973). Chromosomal inversions in Anopheles stephensi.—Parassitologia 15, 129–136.Google ScholarPubMed
Jones, M. D. R. (1973). Delayed effect of light on the mosquito ‘clock’.—Nature, Lond. 245, 384–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, M. D. R., Cubbin, C. M. & Marsh, D. (1972 a). The circadian rhythm of flight activity of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae: the light-response rhythm.—J. exp. Biol. 57, 337–346.Google Scholar
Jones, M. D. R., Cubbin, C. M. & Marsh, D. (1972 b). Light-on effects and the question of bimodality in the circadian flight activity of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae.—J. exp. Biol. 57, 347–357.Google Scholar
Jones, M. D. R., Hill, M. & Hope, A. M. (1967). The circadian flight activity of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae: phase setting by the light regime.—J. exp. Biol. 47, 503–511.Google Scholar
Konopka, R. J. & Benzer, S. (1971). Clock mutants of Drosophila melanogaster.—Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68, 2112–2116.Google Scholar
Nayar, J. K. (1967). The pupation rhythm in Aedes taeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culcidae). II. Ontogenetic timing, rate of development, and endogenous diurnal rhythm of pupation.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60, 946–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayar, J. K. & Sauerman, D. M. Jr. (1971). The effect of light regimes on the circadian rhythm of flight activity in the mosquito Aedes taeniorhynchus.—J. exp. Biol. 54, 745–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences.—312 pp. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1960). Principles and procedures of statistics, with special reference to the biological sciences.—pp. 107–109. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar