Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:49:41.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of host suitability on the range of grasshopper species utilized by Blaesoxipha atlanis (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) in the field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

T. Danyk ,
M. Mackauer  and
D.L. Johnson
T. Danyk*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 5403 First Avenue South, PO Box 3000, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1J 4B1, Canada
M. Mackauer
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
D.L. Johnson
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 5403 First Avenue South, PO Box 3000, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1J 4B1, Canada Department of Geography, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive West, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1K 3M4, Canada
*
*Fax: ++1 403 382 3156 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Blaesoxipha atlanis (Aldrich) is a common parasitic fly of agriculturally important grasshoppers in Canada. The suitability of Camnula pellucida (Scudder), Melanoplus bivittatus (Say), Melanoplus packardii Scudder, and Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fabricius) as hosts was studied in the laboratory. Grasshoppers were singly-parasitized or left unparasitized and reared for 9 days. Melanoplus bivittatus and M. packardii did not support parasite development, i.e. were non-permissive hosts. In both species, parasite larvae were melanized and encapsulated, but development proceeded further in M. packardii. Melanoplus sanguinipes and C. pellucida were permissive host species with, respectively, 70% and 35% of the implanted larvae emerging from their hosts of which 86% and 50% developed into adults. Parasite development time was longer in C. pellucida. Adult B. atlanis dry mass varied with host species and host mass at parasitism, but not with host sex. Parasites developing in M. sanguinipes were larger in terms of dry mass than counterparts developing in C. pellucida. In permissive species, unparasitized grasshoppers gained in body mass while parasitized insects lost mass during the 9-day observation period. In non-permissive species, all insects gained in body mass, but parasitized females gained less mass than unparasitized conspecifics. All unparasitized grasshoppers survived while 75–95% of permissive and 30–40% of non-permissive hosts died. Variation in the intensity of field parasitism among grasshopper species may be explained, at least in part, by qualitative differences in suitability between potential host species. Novel pest management strategies emphasize preservation of a small proportion of the pest population for natural enemies. Consideration of the outcome of specific host-parasite interactions should improve the understanding of grasshopper population dynamics and increase the predictive value of models that assess potential crop losses.

Keywords

AcrididaeBlaesoxipha atlanishost suitabilityhost rangeparasitoid
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 95 , Issue 6 , December 2005 , pp. 571 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baxter, J.A. & Morrison, P.E. (1983) Dynamics of growth modified by larval population density in the flesh fly, Sarcophaga bullata. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61, 512–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckage, N.E. & Riddiford, L.M. (1978) Developmental interactions between the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta and its braconid parasite Apanteles congregatus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 23, 139–151Google Scholar
Beckage, N.E. & Riddiford, L.M. (1983) Growth and development of the endoparasitic wasp Apanteles congregatus: dependence on host nutritional status and parasite load. Physiological Entomology 8, 231–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckage, N.E. & Tan, F.F. (2002) Development of the braconid wasp Cotesia congregata in a semi-permissive noctuid host, Trichplusia ni. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 81, 49–52Google Scholar
Boulétreau, M. (1986) The genetic and coevolutionary interactions between parasitoids and their hosts. pp. 169–200in Waage, J. & Greathead, D. (Eds) Insect parasitoids. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Casu, R.E., Eisemann, C.H., Vuocolo, T. & Tellam, R.L. (1996) The major excretory/secretory protease from Lucilia cuprina larvae is also a gut digestive protease. International Journal for Parasitology 26, 623–628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charnov, E.L. & Skinner, S.W. (1985) Complimentary approaches to the understanding of parasitoid oviposition decisions. Environmental Entomology 14, 383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cioli, D., Knop, P.M. & Senft, A.W. (1977) A study of Schistosoma mansoni transferred into permissive and nonpermissive hosts. International Journal for Parasitology 7, 293–297CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clausen, C.P. (1940) Entomophagous insects. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Cloutier, C. & Mackauer, M. (1979) The effect of parasitism by Aphidius smithi (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) on the food budget of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera: Aphididae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 57, 1605–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danyk, T., Johnson, D.L. & Mackauer, M. (2000) Parasitism of the grasshopper Melanoplus sanguinipes by a sarcophagid fly, Blaesoxipha atlanis: influence of solitary and gregarious development on host and parasitoid. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 94, 259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danyk, T., Mackauer, M. & Johnson, D.L. (2005) Reduced food consumption in the grasshopper Melanoplus sanguinipes (Orthoptera: Acrididae) parasitized by Blaesoxipha atlanis (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Canadian Entomologist 137, 356–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfray, H.C.J. (1994) Parasitoids, behavioral and evolutionary ecology. Princeton, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greathead, D.J. (1992) Natural enemies of tropical locusts and grasshoppers: their impact and potential as biological control agents. pp. 105–121in Lomer, C.J. & Prior, C. (Eds) Biological control of locusts and grasshoppers. Wallingford, CAB International.Google Scholar
Gross, H.R., Rogers, C.E. & Carpenter, J.E. (1996) Development of Archytas marmoratus (Diptera: Tachinidae) reared in Galleria mellonella larvae (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) feeding on selected diets. Biological Control 6, 158–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardman, J.M., Smoliak, S. (1982) The relative impact of various grasshopper species on Stipa-Agropyron mixed prairie and fescue prairie in southern Alberta. Journal of Range Management 35, 171–176Google Scholar
Hewitt, G.B. & Onsager, J.A. (1982) A method for forecasting potential losses from grasshopper feeding on northern mixed prairie forages. Journal of Range Management 35, 53–57Google Scholar
Joern, A. & Gaines, S.B. (1990) Population dynamics and regulation in grasshoppers pp. 415–482Chapman, R.F. & Joern, A. (Eds) Biology of grasshoppers. New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Johnson, D.L. (1989) Spatial autocorrelation, spatial modeling, and improvements in grasshopper survey methodology. Canadian Entomologist 121, 579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D.L. & Pavlikova, E. (1986) Reduction of consumption by grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) infected with Nosema locustae Canning (Microsporidia: Nosematidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 48, 232–238Google Scholar
Johnson, D.L., Hill, B.D., Hinks, C.F. & Schaalje, G.E. (1986) Aerial application of the pyrethroid deltamethrin for grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) control. Journal of Economic Entomology 79, 181–188Google Scholar
Johnson, R.R. (1980) Elementary statistics. 3rd edn. North Scituate, Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
King, E.G., Miles, L.R. & Martin, D.F. (1976) Some effects of superparasitism by Lixophaga diatraeae of sugarcane borer larvae in the laboratory. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 20, 261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, J.A., Schell, S.P., Foster, R.N., Reuter, C. & Rachad, T. (2000) Reduced agent-area treatments (RAAT) for management of rangeland grasshoppers: efficacy and economics under operational conditions. International Journal of Pest Management 46, 29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomer, C.J., Bateman, R.P., Johnson, D.L., Langewald, J. & Thomas, M. (2001) Biological control of locusts and grasshoppers. Annual Review of Entomology 46, 667–702Google Scholar
Lopez, R., Ferro, D.N. & VanDriesche, R.G. (1995) Two tachinid species discriminate between parasitized and non-parasitized hosts. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 75, 37–45Google Scholar
Mackauer, M. (1990) Host discrimination and larval competition in solitary endoparasitoids. pp. 41–62in Mackauer, M., Ehler, L.E. & Roland, J. (Eds) Critical issues in biological control. Andover, Intercept Ltd.Google Scholar
Mackauer, M. & Sequeira, R. (1993) Patterns of development in insect parasites. pp. 1–23in Beckage, N.E., Thompson, S.N. & Federici, B.A. (Eds) Parasites and pathogens of insects. Volume 1 San Diego, Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Mackauer, M., Sequeira, R. & Otto, M. (1997) Growth and development in parasitoid wasps: adaptation to variable host resources. pp. 191–203 in Dettner, K., Bauer, G. & Völkl, W. (Eds) Vertical food web interactions: evolutionary patterns and driving forces. Ecological studies, Volume 130. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P.A., Johnson, D.L., Forsyth, D.J. & Hill, B. (2000) Effects of two grasshopper control insecticides on the food resources and reproductive success of two species of grassland songbird. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 19, 2987–2996Google Scholar
Nicol, C.M.Y. & Mackauer, M. (1999) The scaling of body size and mass in a host-parasitoid association: influence of host species and stage. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 90, 83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nogge, G. (1972) Untersuchungen zur extraintestinalen Verdauung bei den Larven von Hypoderma bovis (DeGeer) (Diptera, Hypodermatidae). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 38, 295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olfert, O., Hinks, C.F. & Westcott, N.D. (1990) Analysis of the factors contributing to the biotic potential of grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) reared on different cereal cultivars in the laboratory and in the field. Journal of Agricultural Entomology 7, 275–282Google Scholar
Parker, F.D. & Pinnell, R.E. (1973) Effect on food consumption of the imported cabbageworm when parasitized by two species of Apanteles. Environmental Entomology 2, 216–219Google Scholar
Pavillard, E.R. & Wright, E.A. (1957) An antibiotic from maggots. Nature 180, 916–917CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickford, R. & Randell, R.L. (1969) A non-diapause strain of the migratory grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Canadian Entomologist 101, 894–896Google Scholar
Poulin, R. (1995) “Adaptive” changes in the behaviour of parasitized animals: a critical review. International Journal for Parasitology 25, 1371–1383CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Przybyszewski, J. & Capinera, J.L. (1991) Patterns of parasitism among shortgrass prairie grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) populations. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 64, 5–17Google Scholar
Quinn, M.A., Johnson, P.S., Butterfield, C.H. & Walgenbach, D.D. (1993) Effect of grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) density and plant composition on growth and destruction of grasses. Environmental Entomology 22, 993–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, N.E. (1973) Arthropod and nematode parasites, parasitoids, and predators of Acrididae in North America north of Mexico. Technical Bulletin No. 1460. Washington United States Department of AgricultureGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (1989) SAS/STAT user's guide, Version 6. 4th edn. Cary North Carolina, SAS InstituteGoogle Scholar
Sequeira, R. & Mackauer, M. (1992) Nutritional ecology of an insect host–parasitoid association: the pea aphid– Aphidius ervi system. Ecology 73, 183–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R.W. (1958) Parasites of nymphal and adult grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in western Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 36, 217–262Google Scholar
Smith, R.W. (1965) A field population of Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fab.) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) and its parasites. Canadian Journal of Zoology 43, 179–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
So, P.-M. & Dudgeon, D. (1989) Life-history responses of larviparous Boettcherisca formosensis (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) to larval competition for food, including comparisons with oviparous Hemipyrellia ligurriens (Calliphoridae). Ecological Entomology 14, 349–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stireman, J.O. III. (2002) Host location and selection cues in a generalist tachinid parasitoid. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 103, 23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
StiremanJ.O., III. J.O., III. & Singer, M.S. (2003) What determines host range in parasitoids? An analysis of a tachinid parasitoid community. Oecologia 135, 629–638Google Scholar
Streett, D.A. & McGuire, M.R. (1990) Pathogenic diseases of grasshoppers Biology of grasshoppers. pp. 483–516 in Chapman, R.F.Joern, A.New York, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Taylor, A.D. (1988) Host effects on larval competition in the gregarious parasitoid Bracon hebetor. Journal of Animal Ecology 57, 163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D.B. & Mangan, R.L. (1987) Comparison of gelled and meat diets for rearing screwworm, Cochliomyia hominivorax (Diptera: Calliphoridae), larvae. Journal of Economic Entomology 80, 427–432Google Scholar
Thompson, S.N. (1993) Redirection of host metabolism and effects on parasite nutrition. pp. 125–144in Beckage, N.E., Thompson, S.N. & Federici, B.A. (Eds) Parasites and pathogens of insects, Volume 1. San Diego, Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Vinson, S.B. & Iwantsch, G.F. (1980) Host suitability for insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology 25, 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar