Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:16:47.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of behaviour modifying chemicals on mating success of the red bollworm Diparopsis castanea Hmps. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in Malawi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. J. Marks
R. J. Marks
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Makoka Research Station, Private Bag 3, Thondwe, Malawi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The synthetic sex pheromone (dicastalure) of the red bollworm of cotton, Diparopsis castanea Hmps., in Central and Southern Africa, and an inhibitor of male sexual attraction (trans-9-dodecenyl acetate,=IIA), were used in an enclosed 0·2 ha cotton field-cage to reduce successful female matings. Over one month dicastalure at 21·0 and 42·3 g/ha produced average reductions in mating of 47·9% and 72·5% respectively and 37·9 g IIA/ha produced an overall reduction in mating of 71·5%, or 79·5% in released moth populations, over the same period. The proportion of virgin females present in disruption situations was significantly greater than in untreated populations and was density-independent for moth populations of up to 2 200/ha. The proportion of fertile eggs in disruption situations was correspondingly reduced to 30·2% from an average of 67·9% in control cycles. Reduction in sex pheromone trap catches is an unsatisfactory indicator of the extent to which males are prevented from inseminating females and considerably over-estimates the true degree of disruption. This is the first time that a naturally occurring inhibitor has been used successfully to disrupt mating in a field population of insects and it indicates the potential of the method for the control of high density pest populations in cotton. However, use of polyethylene dispensing mechanisms similar to those used in the field-cage disruption experiments would be unsuitable as a practical method of dispensing behaviour modifying chemicals and it is suggested that, for suitably controlled release of such chemicals, currently available microencapsulation technology offers the best prospects.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 66 , Issue 2 , June 1976 , pp. 279 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartell, R. J. & Lawrence, L. A. (1973). Reduction in responsiveness of males of Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera) to sex pheromone following previous brief pheromonal exposure.—J. Insect Physiol. 19, 845–855.Google Scholar
Beroza, M. & Knipling, E. F. (1972). Gypsy moth control with the sex attractant pheromone.—Science, N.Y. 177, 19–27.Google Scholar
Cameron, E. A., Schwalbe, C. P., Beroza, M. & Knipling, E. F. (1974). Disruption of gypsy moth mating with microencapsulated disparlure.—Science, N.Y. 183, 972–973.Google Scholar
Cameron, E. A., Schwalbe, C. P., Stevens, L. J. & Beroza, M. (1975). Field tests of the olefin precursor of disparlure for the suppression of mating in the gypsy moth.—J. econ. Ent. 68, 158–160.Google Scholar
Campion, D. G., Bettany, B. W., Nesbitt, B.F., Beevor, P.S., Lester, R. & Poppi, R. G. (1974). Field studies of the female sex pheromone of the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) in Cyprus.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CardÉ, R.T., Roelofs, W. L. & Doane, C. C. (1973). Natural inhibitor of the gypsy moth sex attractant.—Nature, Lond. 241, 474–475.Google Scholar
Gaston, L. K., Shorey, H. H. & Saario, C. A. (1967). Insect population control by the use of sex pheromones to inhibit orientation between the sexes.—Nature, Lond. 213, 1155.Google Scholar
Kaae, R. S., Shorey, H. H., Gaston, L. K. & Hummel, H. H. (1974). Sex pheromones of Lepidoptera: disruption of pheromone communication in Trichoplusia ni and Pectinophora gossypiella by permeation of the air with nonpheromone chemicals.—Environ. Entomol. 3, 87–89.Google Scholar
Marks, R. J. (1976 a). Mating behaviour and fecundity of the red bollworm Diparopsis castanea Hmps. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 66, 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, R. J. (1976 b). Field studies with the synthetic sex pheromone and inhibitor of the red bollworm Diparopsis castanea Hmps. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in Malawi.—Bull. ent. Res. 66, 243–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclaughlin, J. R., Shorey, H. H., Gaston, L.K., Kaae, R. S. & Stewart, F. D. (1972). Sex pheromones of Lepidoptera. XXXI. Disruption of sex pheromone communication in Pectinophora gossypiella with hexalure.—Environ. Entomol. 1, 645–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesbitt, B. F., Beevor, P. S., Cole, R. A., Lester, R. & Poppi, R. G. (1973 a). Sex pheromone of two noctuid moths.—Nature New Biol. 244, 203–209.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, B. F., Beevor, P. S., Cole, R.A., Lester, R. & Poppi, R. G. (1973 b). Synthesis of both geometric isomers of the major sex pheromone of the red bollworm moth.—Tetrahedron Lett. No. 47, 4669–4670.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, B. F., Beevor, P. S., Cole, R. A., Lester, R & Poppi, R. G. (1975). The isolation and identification of the female sex pheromones of the red bollworm moth, Diparopsis castanea.—J. Insect Physiol. 21, 1091–1096.Google Scholar
Shorey, H. H. (1970). Sex pheromones of Lepidoptera. In Wood, D. L., Silverstein, R. M. & Nakajima, M. (Eds.). Control of insect behaviour by natural products.—pp. 249–284. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Williams, E. V. (1959). Regression analysis.—214 pp. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar