Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:33:47.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improved estimates of the efficiency of traps for Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood and G. pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae), with a note on the effect of the concentration of accompanying host odour on efficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. W. Hargrove
J. W. Hargrove
Affiliation:
Department of Biomathematics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The efficiencies of five mechanical traps and an electric trap for tsetse flies were measured by estimating the numbers of flies which approached the devices but were not captured by them. With this method, it was possible to discern significant differences in efficiencies even if the means differed by as little as 25%. Three biconical traps had estimated efficiencies of 40–70% for Glossina morsitans morsitans Westw. and 50–80% for G. pallidipes Aust. when used in the presence of the odour of one ox. The efficiency of a small electric net was estimated at 70–75% for all tsetse under this test condition, and a modification of one of the biconical traps had an estimated efficiency of 55–85%. The efficiency of this trap increased by a factor of 1·2–2·2 when used with the odour of six oxen, compared to the efficiency in the absence of host odour. Preliminary results suggested that, when used in the presence of ox odour, the efficiency of this trap for teneral tsetse was at least as high as for mature flies.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 70 , Issue 4 , December 1980 , pp. 579 - 587
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bursell, E. (1977). Chemosterilisation of tsetse flies using a pressurised metepa aerosol.—Trans. Rhod. scient. Ass. 58, 43–47.Google Scholar
Challier, A. & Laveissiere, C. (1973). Un nouveau piège pour la capture des glossines (Glossina: Diptera, Muscidae): description et essais sur le terrain.—Cah. ORSTOM, Ser. Entomol. med. Parasitol. 11, 251–262.Google Scholar
Hargrove, J. W. (1977). Some advances in the trapping of tsetse (Glossina spp.) and other flies.—Ecol. Ent. 2, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrove, J. W. & Vale, G. A. (1978). The effect of host odour concentration on catches of tsetse flies (Glossinidae) and other Diptera in the field.—Bull. ent. Res. 68, 607–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrove, J. W. & Vale, G. A. (1979). Aspects of the feasibility of employing odour-baited traps for controlling tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 69, 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. H. T. P. (1930). Report on the trapping of tsetse flies (with illustrations).—8 pp. Pietermaritzburg, Natal Witness.Google Scholar
Harris, R. H. T. P. (1932). Some facts and figures regarding the attempted control of Glossina pallidipes in Zululand.—S. Afr. J. Sci. 29, 495–507.Google Scholar
Morris, K. R. S. & Morris, M. G. (1949). The use of traps against tsetse in West Africa.—Bull. ent. Res. 39, 491–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vale, G. A. (1974). The responses of tsetse flies (Diptera, Glossinidae) to mobile and stationary baits.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 545–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A. & Hargrove, J. W. (1975). Field attraction of tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) to ox odour; the effects of dose.—Trans. Rhod. scient. Ass. 56, 46–50.Google Scholar
Vale, G. A. & Hargrove, J. W. (1979). A method of studying the efficiency of traps for tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) and other insects.—Bull. ent. Res. 69, 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar