Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:31:31.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetics of an esterase associated with resistance to organophosphorus insecticides in the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

P. B. Hughes
Affiliation:
Biological and Chemical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture, New South Wales, P.M.B. 10, P.O., Rydalmere, N.S.W. 2116, Australia
D. A. Raftos
Affiliation:
Biological and Chemical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture, New South Wales, P.M.B. 10, P.O., Rydalmere, N.S.W. 2116, Australia

Abstract

Electrophoresis was used to characterize the esterases in Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann). Of the 16 esterase bands visualized, only one was associated with resistance to organophosphorus insecticides. In laboratory reference strains, the esterase E3 was consistently found in both susceptible and heterozygously resistant flies, but was absent from homozygously resistant flies. It was postulated that resistant flies possessed a non-staining form of E3, designated E3null. Genetic analyses mapped the locus for E3null to a position in the same region as the gene for organophosphorus resistance. No recombinants between the genes for resistance and E3null were detected. In field populations of L. cuprina from several areas in Australia, a close association was found between the frequency of E (0·97) and the proportion of flies resistant to organophosphorus insecticide (0·967). This association suggests that E3null represents the product of a major resistance gene in terms of the ‘mutant ali-esterase’ theory. E3 as found in susceptible blowflies, represents the ‘original’ ali-esterase, the gene for which mutated to one coding for E3null. This mutant enzyme can hydrolyse organophosphates more efficiently than E3 but has lost the ability to hydrolyse 1- and 2-naphthyl acetate (the substrates used to visualize the esterases after electrophoresis).

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, J. T. A. & Whitten, M. J. (1976). The genetic basis for organophosphorus resistance in the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera, Calliphoridae).—Bull. ent. Res. 66, 561568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beranek, A. P. (1974). Esterase variation and organophosphate resistance in populations of Aphis fabae and Myzus persicae.Entomologia exp. appl. 17, 129142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, C. F. & Pasteur, N. (1981). Organophosphorus resistance in vector populations of the complex of Culex pipiens L. (Diptera: Culicidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 71, 153161.Google Scholar
Devonshire, A. L. (1975). Studies of the carboxylesterases of Myzus persicae resistant and susceptible to organophosphorus insecticides.—pp. 6773. in Proceedings of the eighth British Insecticide and Fungicide Conference,17th to 20th November 1975Hotel Metropole,Brighton, England. Vol. 1.—pp. 1372. London, Brit. Crop Prot. Coun.Google Scholar
Devonshire, A. L. (1977). The properties of a carboxylesterase from the peach-potato aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulz.), and its role in conferring insecticide resistance.—Biochem. J. 167, 675683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devonshire, A. L. & Moores, G. D. (1982). A carboxylesterase with broad substrate specificity causes organophosphorus, carbamate and pyrethroid resistance in peach-potato aphids (Myzus persicae).—Pestic. Biochem. & Physiol. 18, 235246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, G. G., Whitten, M. J., Konovalov, C., Arnold, J. T. A. & Maffi, G. (1981). Autosomal genetic maps of the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina dorsalis R.-D. (Diptera: Calliphondae), and possible correlations with the linkage maps of Musca domestica L. and Drosophila melanogaster (Mg.).—Genet. Res. 37, 5569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georghiou, G. P. & Pasteur, N. (1978). Electrophoretic esterase patterns in insecticide-resistant and susceptible mosquitoes.—J.econ. Ent. 71, 201205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georghiou, G. P. & Pasteur, N. (1980). Organophosphate resistance and esterase pattern in a natural population of the southern house mosquito from California.—J. econ. ent. 73, 489492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georghiou, G. P., Pasteur, N. & Hawley, M. K. (1980). Linkage relationships between organo phosphate resistance and a highly active Esterase-B in Culex quinquefasciatus from California.—J. econ. Ent. 73, 301305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, P. B. (1981). Spectrum of cross-resistance to insecticides in field samples of the primary sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina.—Int. J. Parasitol. 11, 475479.Google Scholar
Hughes, P. B. (1982). Organophosphorus resistance in the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina (Wiede mann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae): a genetic study incorporating synergists.—Bull. ent. Res. 72,573582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, P. B. & Devonshire, A. L. (1982). The biochemical basis of resistance to organophos phorus insecticides in the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina.—Pestic. Biochem. & Physiol. 18, 289297.Google Scholar
McKenzie, J. A., Dearn, J. M. & Whitten, M. J. (1980). Genetic basis of resistance to diazinon in Victorian populations of the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina.—Aust. J. biol. Sci. 33, 8595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Brien, S. J. & MacIntyre, R. J. (1978). Genetics and biochemistry of enzymes and specific proteins of Drosophila.—pp. 395551. in Ashburner, M. & Wright, T. R. F. (Eds.). The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Vol. 2a.—604 pp. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Oppenoorth, F. J. & Asperen, K.Van (1960). Allelic genes in the housefly producing modified enzymes that cause organophosphate resistance.—Science 132, 298299.Google Scholar
Ozaki, K. & Koike, H. (1965). Naphthyl acetate esterase in the green rice leafhopper, Nephotettix cincticeps Uhler. with special reference to the resistant colony of the organophosphorus insecticide.—Jap. J. appl. Ent. Zool. 9,5359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozaki, K., Kurosu, Y. & Koike, H. (1966). The relation between malathion resistance and esterase activity in the green rice leafhopper, Nephotettix cincticeps Uhler.—SABCO Journal 2, 98106.Google Scholar
Pasteur, N. & Sinègre, G. (1978). Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) resistance in Culex pipiens pipiens L. from southern France: inheritance and linkage.—Experientia 34, 709711.Google Scholar
Sawicki, R. M. & Keiding, J. (1981). Factors affecting the sequential acquisition by Danish houseflies (Musca domestica L.) of resistance to organophosphorus insecticides.—Pestic. Sci. 12, 587591.Google Scholar
Stone, B. F. & Brown, A. W. A. (1969). Mechanisms of resistance to fenthion in Culex pipiens fatigans Wied.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 40, 401408.Google ScholarPubMed
Sudderuddin, K. I. (1973). An electrophoretic study of some hydrolases from an OP-susceptible and an OP-resistant strain of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulz.).—Comp. Biochem. Physiol. (B) 44, 923929.Google Scholar
Terras, M. A., Rose, H. A. & Hughes, P. B.(1983). Aldrin epoxidase activity in larvae of a susceptible and a resistant strain of the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann).—J. Aust. entornol. Soc. 22, 256.Google Scholar
Van Asperen, K. & Oppenoorth, F. J. (1959).Organophosphate resistance and esterase activity in house flies.—Entomologia exp. appl. 2, 4857.Google Scholar
Van Asperen, K. & Oppenoorth, F. J. (1959).Organophosphate resistance and esterase activity in houseflies.—Nature, Lond. 205, 12911292.Google Scholar
Velthuis, H. H. W. & Van Asperen, K. (1963).Occurrence and inheritance of esterases in Musca domestica.—Entomologia exp. appl. 6, 7987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasutomi, K. (1970). Studies on organophosphate-resistance and esterase activity in the mosquitoes of the Culex pipiens group. I.—Jap. J. sanit. Zool. 21, 4145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasutomi, K. (1971). Studies on diazinon-resistance and esterase activity in Culex tritaeniorhynchus. I.—Jap. J. sanit. Zool. 22, 813.Google Scholar