Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:11:50.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further study of DDT resistance in Anopheles gambiae Giles (Diptera: Culicidae) and a cage test of elimination of resistance from a population by male release

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Chusak Prasittisuk  and
C. F. Curtis
Chusak Prasittisuk
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
C. F. Curtis
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three West African strains of Anopheles gambiae Giles were intensively selected for DDT resistance at the adult stage using both mass selection and family selection with inbreeding. The LT50s for 4% DDT were thereby raised to 2–6 h, i.e. 6–18 × that of a susceptible strain. The selected strains were found to show DDT resistance as first-instar larvae and permethrin resistance as adults. The results of tests for the number of genes involved in causing the resistance and their linkage to genes for dieldrin resistance were equivocal. One of the DDT-resistant strains was bred in population cages with overlapping generations. Releases were made of males of the R70 translocation strain which transmit DDT and dieldrin susceptibility to their female progeny. When DDT selection on the cage population was relaxed, the releases caused a more rapid and complete loss of resistance than occurred in a control population. When selection for DDT resistance was applied to females of the cage population, the releases were able to prevent a build-up of resistance. The use of male releases is discussed as a possible means of countering insecticide resistance in mosquitoes.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , June 1982 , pp. 335 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, D. L., Lowe, R. E., Dame, D. A. & Seawright, J. A. (1980). Mass rearing the genetically altered MACHO strain of Anopheles albimanus Wiedemann.—Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 29, 141–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, C. F., Akiyama, J. & Davidson, G. (1976). A genetic sexing system in Anopheles gambiae species A.—Mosquito News 36, 492–498.Google Scholar
Curtis, C. F., Cook, L. M. & Wood, R. J. (1978). Selection for and against insecticide resistance and possible methods of inhibiting the evolution of resistance in mosquitoes.—Ecol. Entomol. 3, 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, G. & Hamon, J. (1962). A Case of dominant dieldrin resistance in Anopheles gambiae Giles.—Nature, Lond. 196, 1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haridi, A. M. (1972). Inheritance of DDT resistance in species A and B of the Anopheles gambiae complex.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 47, 619–626.Google Scholar
Haridi, A. M. (1974). Linkage studies on DDT and dieldrin resistance in species A and species B of the Anopheles gambiae complex.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 50, 441–448.Google ScholarPubMed
Plapp, F. W. Jr. & Hoyer, R. F. (1968). Possible pleiotropism of a gene conferring resistance to DDT, DDT analogs, and pyrethrins in the housefly and Culex tarsalis.—J. econ. Ent. 61, 761–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasittisuk, C. & Busvine, J. R. (1977). DDT-resistant mosquito strains with cross-resistance to pyrethroids.—Pestic. Sci. 8, 527–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlings, P., Davidson, G., Sakai, R. K., Rathor, H. R., Aslamkhan, M. & Curtis, C. F. (1981). Field measurement of the effective dominance of an insecticide resistance in anopheline mosquitos.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 59, 631–640.Google ScholarPubMed
WHO (World Health Organization) (1970). Insecticide resistance and vector control. Seventeenth report of the WHO Expert Committee on Insecticides.—Tech. Rep. Ser. Wld Hlth Org. no. 443, 279 pp.Google Scholar