Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:25:41.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fitness cost and realized heritability of resistance to spinosad in Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2014

N. Abbas ,
M.M. Mansoor ,
S.A. Shad ,
A.K. Pathan ,
A. Waheed ,
M. Ejaz ,
M. Razaq  and
M.A. Zulfiqar
N. Abbas
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
M.M. Mansoor
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
S.A. Shad*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
A.K. Pathan
Affiliation:
Arid Zone Research Institute (PARC), UmerKot, Pakistan
A. Waheed
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
M. Ejaz
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
M. Razaq
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
M.A. Zulfiqar
Affiliation:
Arid Zone Research Institute (PARC), Multan, Pakistan
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: 00923366033027 Fax: 0092619210068 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The common green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea is a key biological control agent employed in integrated pest management (IPM) programs for managing various insect pests. Spinosad is used for the management of pests in ornamental plants, fruit trees, vegetable and field crops all over the world, including Pakistan. A field-collected population of C. carnea was selected with spinosad and fitness costs and realized heritability were investigated. After selection for five generations, C. carnea developed 12.65- and 73.37-fold resistance to spinosad compared to the field and UNSEL populations. The resistant population had a relative fitness of 1.47, with substantially higher emergence rate of healthy adults, fecundity and hatchability and shorter larval duration, pupal duration, and development time as compared to a susceptible laboratory population. Mean relative growth rate of larvae, intrinsic rate of natural population increase and biotic potential was higher for the spinosad-selected population compared to the susceptible laboratory population. Chrysoperla species are known to show resistance to insecticides which makes the predator compatible with most IPM systems. The realized heritability (h2) value of spinosad resistance was 0.37 in spinosad-selected population of C. carnea.

Keywords

Green lacewingincreased fitnessintrinsic rate of population increasebiotic potential
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 104 , Issue 6 , December 2014 , pp. 707 - 715
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbas, N., Shad, S.A. & Razaq, M. (2012) Fitness cost, cross resistance and realized heritability of resistance to imidacloprid in Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 103, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acheampong, S. & Stark, J.D. (2004) Effects of the agricultural adjuvant Sylgard 309 and the insecticide pymetrozine on demographic parameters of the aphid parasitoid, Diaeretiella rapae . Biological Control 31, 133–137.Google Scholar
Afzal, M. & Khan, M.R. (1978) Life history and feeding behavior of green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Pakistan Journal of Zoology 10, 98–90.Google Scholar
Alyokhin, A.V. & Ferro, D.N. (1999) Relative fitness of Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) resistant and susceptible to the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3A toxin. Journal of Economic Entomology 92, 510–515.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2005) Statistix for Windows, Tallahassee, FL, Analytical Software.Google Scholar
Argentine, J.A., Clarck, J.M. & Ferro, D.N. (1989) Relative fitness of insecticide resistant Colorado potato beetle strains (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environmental Entomology 18, 705–710.Google Scholar
Arno, J. & Gabarra, R. (2011) Side effects of selected insecticides on the Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) predators Macrolophus pygmaeus and Nesidiocoris tenuis (Hemiptera: Miridae). Journal of Pest Science 84, 513–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basit, M., Sayyed, A.H., Saeed, S. & Saleem, M.A. (2012) Lack of fitness costs associated with acetamiprid resistance in Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 105, 1401–1406.Google Scholar
Beeman, R.W. & Nanis, S.M. (1986) Malathion resistance alleles and their fitness in the red flour beetle (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 79, 580–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielza, P., Quinto, V., Gravalos, C., Abellan, J. & Fernandez, E. (2008) Lack of fitness costs of insecticide resistance in the western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 101, 499–503.Google Scholar
Biondi, A., Mommaerts, V., Smagghe, G., Vinuela, E., Zappala, L. & Desneux, N. (2012) The non-target impact of spinosyns on beneficial arthropods. Pest Management Science 68, 1523–1536.Google Scholar
Birch, L.C. (1948) The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. Journal of Animal Ecology 17, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bret, B.L., Larson, L., Schoonover, J., Sparks, T.C. & Thompson, G.D. (1997) Biological properties of Spinosad. Down to Earth 52, 6–13.Google Scholar
Cao, G.C. & Han, Z.J. (2006) Tebufenozide resistance selected in Plutella xylostella and its cross-resistance and fitness cost. Pest Management Science 62, 746–751.Google Scholar
Carriere, Y., Deland, J.P., Roff, D.A. & Vincent, C. (1994) Life-history costs associated with the evolution of insecticide resistance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Science 258, 35–40.Google Scholar
Carriere, Y., Ellers-Kirk, C.A., Patin, L., Sims, M., Meyer, A.S., Liu, Y.B., Dennehy, T.J. & Tabashnik, B.E. (2001) Overwintering cost associated with resistance to transgenic cotton in the pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 94, 935–941.Google Scholar
Chi, H. & Getz, W.M. (1988) Mass rearing and harvesting based on an age-stage, two-sex life table: a potato tuberworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) case study. Environmental Entomology 17, 18–25.Google Scholar
Chi, H. & Yang, T.C. (2003) Two-sex life table and predation rate of Propylaea japonica (Thunberg) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) fed on Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environmental Entomology 32, 327–333.Google Scholar
Cisneros, J., Goulson, D., Derwent, L.C., Penagos, D.I., Hernandez, O. & Williams, T. (2002) Toxic effects of spinosad on predatory insects. Biological Control 23, 156–163.Google Scholar
Cleveland, C.B., Mayes, M.A. & Cryer, S.A. (2001) An ecological risk assessment for spinosad use on cotton. Pest Management Science 58, 70–84.Google Scholar
Desneux, N., Pham-Delegue, M.H. & Kaiser, L. (2004) Effects of sublethal and lethal doses of lambda-cyhalothrin on oviposition experience and host searching behaviour of a parasitic wasp Aphidius ervi . Pest Management Science 60, 381–389.Google Scholar
Desneux, N., Denoyelle, R. & Kaiser, L. (2006) A multi-step bioassay to assess the effect of the deltamethrin on the parasitic wasp Aphidius ervi . Chemosphere 65, 1697–1706.Google Scholar
Desneux, N., Decourtye, A. & Delpuech, J.M. (2007) The sublethal effects of pesticide on beneficial arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 52, 81–106.Google Scholar
Eggers-Schumacher, H.A. (1983) A comparison of the reproductive performance of insecticide resistant and susceptible clones of Myzus persicae . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 34, 301–307.Google Scholar
EPA (1999) LC50 Software Program. Version 1.50. Cincinnati, OH, USA, Ecological Monitoring Research Division, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, EPA, USA. Available online at http://www.epa.gov/nerleerd/stat2.htm Google Scholar
Falconer, D.S. (1989) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 3rd edn. London, UK, Longman.Google Scholar
Finney, D. (1971) Probit Analysis. 3rd edn. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galvan, T.L., Koch, R.L. & Hutchison, W.D. (2005) Effects of spinosad and indoxacarb on survival, development, and reproduction of the multicolored Asian lady beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Biological Control 34, 108–114.Google Scholar
Iqbal, M. & Wright, D.J. (1996) Host resistance to insecticides can confer protection to endo-larval parasitoids. Bulletin of Entomological Research 86, 721–723.Google Scholar
Janmaat, A.F. & Myers, J.H. (2005) The cost of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis varies with the host plant of Trichoplusia ni . Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272, 1031–1038.Google Scholar
Jia, B., Liu, Y., Zhu, Y.C., Liu, X., Gao, C. & Shen, J. (2009) Inheritance, fitness cost and mechanism of resistance to tebufenozide in Spodoptera exigua (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pest Management Science 65, 996–1002.Google Scholar
Kim, D.S., Brooks, D.J. & Riedl, H. (2006) Lethal and sublethal effects of abamectin, spinosad, methoxyfenozide and acetamiprid on the predaceous plant bug, Deraeocoris brevis in the laboratory. Biological Control 51, 465–484.Google Scholar
Kliot, A. & Ghanim, M. (2012) Fitness costs associated with insecticide resistance. Pest Management Science 68, 1431–1437.Google Scholar
Lingren, P.D., Ridgway, R.L. & Jones, S.L. (1968) Consumption by several common arthropod predators of eggs and larvae of two Heliothis species that attack cotton. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 61, 613–617.Google Scholar
Litchfield, J.T. & Wilcoxon, F. (1949) A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 99, 99–103.Google Scholar
Liu, Z. & Han, Z. (2006) Fitness costs of laboratory selected imidacloprid resistance in the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal). Pest Management Science 62, 279–282.Google Scholar
McKenzie, J.A. (1993) Measuring fitness and intergenic interactions: the evolution of resistance to diazinon in Lucilia cuprina . Genetica 90, 227–237.Google Scholar
McKenzie, J.A., Whitten, M.J. & Adena, M.A. (1982) The effect of genetic background on the fitness of diazinon resistance genotypes of the Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina . Heredity 49, 1–9.Google Scholar
Mulligan, E.A., Ferry, N., Jouanin, L., Romeis, J. & Gatehouse, A.M.R. (2010) Characterizations of adult green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea) digestive physiology: impact of a cysteine protease inhibitor and a synthetic pyrethroid. Pest Management Science 66, 325–336.Google Scholar
Pathan, A.K., Sayyed, A.H., Aslam, M., Razaq, M., Jilani, G. & Saleem, M.A. (2008) Evidence of field-evolved resistance to organophosphates and pyrethroids in Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 101, 1676–1684.Google Scholar
Pathan, A.K., Sayyed, A.H., Aslam, M., Liu, T.X., Razzaq, M. & Gillani, W.A. (2010) Resistance to pyrethroids and organophosphates increased fitness and predation potential of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 103, 823–834.Google Scholar
Penagos, D.I., Cisneros, J., Hernandez, O. & Williams, T. (2005) Lethal and sublethal effects of the naturally derived insecticide spinosad on parasitoids of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biocontrol Science and Technology 15, 81–95.Google Scholar
Pree, D.J., Archibald, D.E. & Morrison, R.K. (1989) Resistance to insecticides in the common green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae) in southern Ontario. Journal of Economic Entomology 82, 29–54.Google Scholar
Radford, P.J. (1967) Growth analysis formulae; their use and abuse. Crop Science 7, 171–175.Google Scholar
Rahman, M.M., Baker, G., Powis, K., Roush, R.T. & Schmidt, O. (2010) Induction and transmission of tolerance to the synthetic pesticide emamectin benzoate in field and laboratory populations of Diamondback Moth. Journal of Economic Entomology 103, 1347–1354.Google Scholar
Rajakulendran, S.V. & Plapp, F.W. (1982) Synergism of five synthetic pyrethroids by chlordimeform against the tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and a predator Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 75, 1089–1092.Google Scholar
Romeis, J., Meissle, M. & Bigler, F. (2006) Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control. Nature Biotechnology 24, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roush, R.T. & Daly, J.C. (1990) The role of population genetics in resistance research and management. pp. 97–152 in Roush, R.T. & Tabashnik, B.E. (Eds) Pesticide Resistance in Arthropods. New York, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Roush, R.T. & Plapp, F.W. (1982) Effects of insecticide resistance on biotic potential of the house fly (Diptera: Muscidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 75, 708–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saber, M. (2011) Acute and population level toxicity of imidacloprid and fenpyroximate on an important egg parasitoid, Trichogramma cacoeciae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Ecotoxicology 20, 1476–1484.Google Scholar
Saleem, M.A., Ahmad, M., Aslam, M. & Sayyed, A.H. (2008) Resistance to selected organochlorin, organophosphate, carbamate and pyrethroid, in Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Pakistan. Journal of Economic Entomology 101, 1667–1675.Google Scholar
Salgado, V.L. (1997) The modes of action of spinosad and other insect control products. Down to Earth 52, 35–43.Google Scholar
Salgado, V.L. (1998) Studies on the modes of action of spinosad: insect symptoms and physiological correlates. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 60, 91–102.Google Scholar
Sayyed, A.H. & Wright, D.J. (2001) Fitness costs and stability of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in a field population of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (L.). Ecological Entomology 26, 502–508.Google Scholar
Sayyed, A.H., Cerda, H. & Wright, D.J. (2003) Could Bt transgenic crops have nutritionally favorable effects on resistant insects? Ecology Letters 6, 167–169.Google Scholar
Sayyed, A.H., Ahmad, M. & Crickmore, N. (2008 a) Fitness costs limit the development of resistance to indoxacarb and deltamethrin in Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 101, 1927–1933.Google Scholar
Sayyed, A.H., Saeed, S., Noor-Ul-Ane, M. & Crickmore, N. (2008 b) Genetic, biochemical, and physiological characterization of spinosad resistance in Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 101, 1658–1666.Google Scholar
Sayyed, A.H., Pathan, A.K. & Faheem, U. (2010) Cross-resistance, genetics and stability of resistance to deltamethrin in a population of Chrysoperla carnea from Multan, Pakistan. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 98, 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stara, J., Ourednickova, J. & Kocourek, F. (2011) Laboratory evaluation of the side effects of insecticides on Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae), Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseidae). Journal of Pest Science 84, 25–31.Google Scholar
Stark, J.D. & Banks, J.E. (2003) Population-level effects of pesticides and other toxicants on arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 48, 505–519.Google Scholar
Stark, J.D., Vargas, R. & Miller, N. (2004) Toxicity of spinosad in protein bait to three economically important tephritid fruit fly species (Diptera:Tephritidae) and their parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 911–15.Google Scholar
Stark, J.D., Vargas, R. & Banks, J.E. (2007) Incorporating ecologically relevant measures of pesticide effect for estimating the compatibility of pesticides and biocontrol agents. Journal of Economic Entomology 100, 1027–1032.Google Scholar
Suma, P., Zappala, L., Mazzeo, G. & Siscaro, G. (2009) Lethal and sub-lethal effects of insecticides on natural enemies of citrus scale pests. Biological Control 54, 651–661.Google Scholar
Syed, A.N., Ashfaq, M. & Khan, S. (2005) Comparison of development and predation of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on different densities of two hosts (Bemisia tabaci, and Amrasca devastans). Pakistan Entomologist 27, 41–44.Google Scholar
Symondson, W.O.C., Sunderland, K.D. & Greenstone, M.H. (2002) Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? Annual Review of Entomology 47, 561–594.Google Scholar
Tabashnik, B.E. (1992) Resistance risk assessment: realized heritability of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 85, 1551–1559.Google Scholar
Tauber, C.A., De-Leon, T., Penny, N.D. & Tauber, M.J. (2000) The genus Ceraeochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) of America north of Mexico: larvae, adults, and comparative biology. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93, 1195–1221.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. & Hutchins, S. (1999) Spinosad. Pesticide Outlook 10, 78–81.Google Scholar
Wang, D., Qiu, X., Wang, H., Qiao, K. & Wang, K. (2010) Reduced fitness associated with spinosad resistance in Helicoverpa armigera . Phytoparasitica 38, 103–110.Google Scholar
Wang, R. & Nordlund, D.A. (1994) Use of Chrysoperla spp. (Neuroptera: Chrisopidae) in augmentative release programs for control of arthropod pests. Biocontrol News and Information 15, 51–57.Google Scholar
White, N.D.G. & Bell, R.J. (1990) Relative fitness of a malathion-resistant strain of Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Coleoptera, Cucujidae) when development and oviposition occur in malathion-treated and untreated wheat kernels. Journal of Economic Entomology 26, 23–37.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. & Tisdell, C. (2001) Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs. Ecological Economics 39, 449–462.Google Scholar
Wu, G. & Miyata, T. (2005) Susceptibilities to methamidophos and enzymatic characteristics in 18 species of pest insects and their natural enemies in crucifer vegetable crops. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 82, 79–93.Google Scholar
Wu, G., Jiang, S.R. & Miyata, T. (2004) Seasonal changes of methamidophos susceptibility and biochemical properties in Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) and its parasitoid Cotesia plutellae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 1689–1698.Google Scholar
Zeleny, D. (1985) Chrysopid occurrence in west Palearctic temperate forests and derived biotypes. pp. 151–160 in Canard, M., Semeria, Y. & New, T.R. (Eds) Biology of Chrysopidae. The Hague, The Netherlands, Junk.Google Scholar