Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:28:54.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Field-scale dispersal of Aphodius dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in response to avermectin treatments on pastured cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

L. Webb*
Affiliation:
Land Economy & Environment Research Group, Scottish Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr, KA6 5HW, UK
D.J. Beaumont
Affiliation:
Reserves Ecology, RSPB Scotland, 25 Ravelston Terrace, Edinburgh, EH4 3TP, UK
R.G. Nager
Affiliation:
Division of Environmental & Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
D.I. McCracken
Affiliation:
Land Economy & Environment Research Group, Scottish Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr, KA6 5HW, UK
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +44 141 331 9080 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Very few studies have examined, at the field scale, the potential for faecal residues in the dung of avermectin-treated cattle to affect dung-breeding insects. The current study examined populations of dung beetles (Scarabaeidae: Aphodius) using pitfall traps baited with dung from untreated cattle on 26 fields across eight farms in southwest Scotland. The fields were grazed either by untreated cattle or by cattle treated with an avermectin product, i.e. doramectin or ivermectin. During the two-year study, significantly more beetles were trapped in fields grazed by treated cattle (n=9377 beetles) than in fields where cattle remained untreated (n=2483 beetles). Additional trials showed that beetles preferentially colonised dung of untreated versus doramectin-treated cattle. This may explain the higher captures of beetles in traps baited with dung of untreated cattle, which were located in fields of treated cattle. Given that Aphodius beetles avoided dung of treated cattle in the current study, the potential harmful effects of avermectin residues in cattle dung could be reduced through livestock management practices that maximise the availability of dung from untreated livestock in areas where avermectins are being used.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barth, D. (1993) Importance of methodology in the interpretation of factors affecting degradation of dung. Veterinary Parasitology 48, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, W.C. (1985) Ivermectin: an update. Parasitology Today 1, 1016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dadour, I.R., Cook, D.F. & Hennessy, D. (2000) Reproduction and Survival of the Dung Beetle Onthophagus binodis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Exposed to Abamectin and Doramectin Residues in Cattle Dung. Environmental Entomology 29, 11161122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downie, I.S., Ribera, I., McCracken, D.I., Wilson, W.L., Foster, G.N., Waterhouse, A., Abernethy, V.J. & Murphy, K.J. (2000) Modelling populations of Erigone atra and E. dentipalpis (Araneae: Linyphiidae) across an agricultural gradient in Scotland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 80, 1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincher, G.T. (1992) Injectable Ivermectin for Cattle: Effects on Some Dung-Inhabiting Insects. Environmental Entomology 21, 871876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, J.A., Gittings, T. & Giller, P.S. (1998) Aphodius dung beetle assemblage stability at different spatial and temporal scales. Applied Soil Ecology 10, 2736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, J.A., Gittings, T. & Giller, P.S. (1999) Spatial and temporal variation in species composition of dung beetle assemblages in southern Ireland. Ecological Entomology 24, 2436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floate, K.D. (1998) Does a repellent effect contribute to reduced levels of insect activity in dung from cattle treated with ivermectin? Bulletin of Entomological Research 88, 291297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floate, K.D. (2007) Endectocide residues affect insect attraction to dung from treated cattle: implications for toxicity tests. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 21, 312322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floate, K.D., Spooner, R.W. & Colwell, D.D. (2001) Larvicidal activity of endectocides against pest flies in the dung of treated cattle. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 15, 117120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floate, K.D., Colwell, D.D. & Fox, A.S. (2002) Reductions of non-pest insects in dung of cattle treated with endectocides: a comparison of four products. Bulletin of Entomological Research 92, 471481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floate, K.D., Wardhaugh, K.G., Boxall, A.B.A. & Sherratt, T.N. (2005) Fecal residues of veterinary pesticides: Nontarget effects in the pasture environment. Annual Review of Entomology 50, 153179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floate, K.D., Bouchard, P., Holroyd, G.L., Poulin, R.G. & Wellicome, T.I. (2008) Does doramectin use on cattle indirectly affect the endangered Burrowing Owl? Rangeland Ecology and Management 61, 543553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, A.D. (2004) Has Danish agriculture maintained farmland bird populations? Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 427439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gittings, T. & Giller, P.S. (1997) Life history traits and resource utilisation in an assemblage of north temperate Aphodius dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Ecography 20, 5566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gittings, T. & Giller, P.S. (1998) Resource quality and the colonisation and succession of coprophagous dung beetles. Ecography 21, 581592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halley, B.A., Nessel, R.J. & Lu, A.Y.H. (1989) Environmental Aspects of Ivermectin Usage in Livestock: General Considerations. pp. 162172 in Campbell, W.C. (Ed.) Ivermectin and Abamectin. New York, USA, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanski, I. (1980a) The community of coprophagous beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae and Hydrophilidae) in northern Europe. Annales Entomologici Fennici 46, 5773.Google Scholar
Herd, R.P., Sams, R.A. & Ashcraft, S.M. (1996) Persistence of Ivermectin in Plasma and Faeces Following Treatment of Cows with Ivermectin Sustained-release, Pour-on or Injectable Formulations. International Journal for Parasitology 26, 10871093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirschberger, P. (1999) Larval population density affects female weight and fecundity in the dung beetle Aphodius ater. Ecological Entomology 24, 316322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschberger, P. & Degro, H.N. (1996) Oviposition of the dung beetle Aphodius ater in relation to the abundance of yellow dungfly larvae (Scatophaga stercoraria). Ecological Entomology 21, 352357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holter, P. (1979) Abundance and reproductive strategy of the dung beetle Aphodius rufipes (L.) (Scarabaeidae). Ecological Entomology 4, 317326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holter, P., Sommer, C., Grønvold, J. & Madsen, M. (1993a) Effects of ivermectin treatment on the attraction of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae and Hydrophilidae) to cow pats. Bulletin of Entomological Research 83, 5358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holter, P., Sommer, C. & Grønvold, J. (1993b) Attractiveness of dung from ivermectin-treated cattle to Danish and afrotropical scarabaeid dung beetles. Veterinary Parasitology 48, 159169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutton, S.A. & Giller, P.S. (2003) The effects of intensification of agriculture on northern temperate dung beetle communities. Journal of Applied Ecology 40, 994–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krüger, K. & Scholtz, C.H. (1997) Lethal and sublethal effects of ivermectin on the dung-breeding beetles Euoniticellus intermedius (Reiche) and Onitis alexis Klug (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 61, 123131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krüger, K. & Scholtz, C.H. (1998a) Changes in the structure of dung insect communities after ivermectin usage in a grassland ecosystem. I. Impact of ivermectin under drought conditions. Acta Oecologica – International Journal of Ecology 19, 425438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krüger, K. & Scholtz, C.H. (1998b) Changes in the structure of dung insect communities after ivermectin usage in a grassland ecosystem. II. Impact of ivermectin under high-rainfall conditions. Acta Oecologica – International Journal of Ecology 19, 439451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kryger, U., Deschodt, C. & Scholtz, C.H. (2005) Effects of fluazuron and ivermectin treatment of cattle on the structure of dung beetle communities. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 105, 649656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W. & Wolfinger, R.D. (1996) SAS® System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC, USA, SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Lobo, J.M., Lumaret, J.P. & Jay-Robert, P. (1998) Sampling dung beetles in the French Mediterranean area: effects of abiotic factors and farm practices. Pedobiologia 42, 252266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCracken, D.I. (1993) The potential for avermectins to affect wildlife. Veterinary Parasitology 48, 273280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roslin, T. (2000) Dung beetle movements at two spatial scales. Oikos 91, 323335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushton, S.P., Ormerod, S.J. & Kerby, G. (2004) New paradigms for modelling species distributions? Journal of Applied Ecology 41, 193200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M.F., Clare, N. & Cole, A.J. (1978) A comparative study of coprophilic beetles in pasture over a peat and a mineral soil. Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society, Series A 6, 215221.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2001) SAS®/STAT Release 8.2. Cary, NC, USA, SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Smith, K.E. & Wall, R. (1998) Estimates of population density and dispersal in the blowfly Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 88, 6573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, K.E.J., Bourn, N.A.D. & Thomas, J.A. (2001) An evaluation of three quick methods commonly used to assess sward height in ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 11481154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, L. & James, S. (1993) Some effects of ivermectin on the yellow dung fly, Scatophaga stercoraria. Veterinary Parasitology 48, 181191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suarez, V.H., Lifschitz, A.L., Sallovitz, J.M. & Lanusse, C.E. (2003) Effects of ivermectin and doramectin faecal residues on the invertebrate colonisation of cattle dung. Journal of Applied Entomology 127, 481488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toutain, P.L., Upson, D.W., Terhune, T.N. & McKenzie, M.E. (1997) Comparative pharmacokinetics of doramectin and ivermectin in cattle. Veterinary Parasitology 72, 38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wall, R. & Strong, L. (1987) Environmental consequences of treating cattle with the antiparasitic drug ivermectin. Nature 327, 418421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wardhaugh, K.G. & Mahon, R.J. (1991) Avermectin residues in sheep and cattle dung and their effects on dung-beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) colonization and dung burial. Bulletin of Entomological Research 81, 333339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardhaugh, K.G. & Rodriguez-Menendez, H. (1988) The effects of the antiparasitic drug, ivermectin, on the development and survival of the dung-breeding fly, Orthelia cornicina (F.) and the scarabaeine dung beetles, Copris hispanus L., Bubas bubalus (Oliver) and Onitis belial F. Journal of Applied Entomology 106, 381389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wassmer, T. (1994) Seasonality of coprophagous beetles in the Kaiserstuhl area near Freiburg (SW-Germany) including the winter months. Acta Oecologia 15, 607631.Google Scholar
Webb, L. (2004) The impact of avermectin usage on the ecology of dung insect communities and the potential implications for foraging birds. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.Google Scholar
Webb, L., Beaumont, D.J., Nager, R.G. & McCracken, D.I. (2007) Effects of avermectin residues in cattle dung on yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria L.) populations in grazed pastures. Bulletin of Entomological Research 97, 129138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, E. (1960) The natural history of some species of Aphodius (Col., Scarabaeidae) in the Northern Pennines. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 96, 2530.Google Scholar
Wratten, S.D. & Forbes, A.B. (1995) Environmental assessment of veterinary products with particular reference to the avermectins. Pesticide Outlook 6, 2024.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Webb supplementary material

Table and figures.pdf

Download Webb supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 59.8 KB