Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:32:33.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feeding, oviposition and survival of Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae) on Bt and non-Bt cottons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2008

Z. Lei
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Texas AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University System, 2415 E. Highway 83, Weslaco, TX 78596-8399USA State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
T.-X. Liu*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Texas AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University System, 2415 E. Highway 83, Weslaco, TX 78596-8399USA
S.M. Greenberg
Affiliation:
BIRU-KSARC-SPA, ARS, USDA, 2413 E. Highway 83, Weslaco, TX 78596, USA
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +1 956-968 0641 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The effects of Bt transgenic cottons (Bt-I expressing cry1Ac and Bt-II expressing cry1Ab and cry2Ab or cry1Ab and cry1Fa) and non-Bt cottons on feeding, oviposition and longevity of adults, and development and survival of Liriomyza trifolii larvae were studied under laboratory conditions; and infestation on four Bt and two non-Bt cotton traits were investigated under field conditions. Laboratory choice and no-choice tests showed that L. trifolii adults were capable of distinguishing between Bt cottons and non-Bt cottons. In a choice test on younger plants (4–5 leaves), the adults were found more often and made more feeding punctures (FP) on non-Bt cottons than on Bt cottons. On older plants (8–9 leaves), adults made the most FP on non-Bt cotton followed by those on Bt-II cottons and the least on Bt-I cotton. The females oviposited more eggs (6.7 eggs per leaf) on non-Bt cotton than on Bt-I (1.7 eggs per leaf) and Bt-II (0.8 eggs per leaf) cottons on younger plants and oviposited similar numbers of eggs (0.7–1.3 eggs per leaf) on non-Bt and Bt cottons on older plants. In a no-choice test, the females also fed more FP on non-Bt cottons than on Bt cottons on both younger and older plants. The females oviposited more eggs (15.6 eggs per leaf) on non-Bt cotton than on Bt-I (8.2 eggs per leaf) and Bt-II (6.5 eggs per leaf) cottons on younger plants and similar numbers of eggs (2.5–3.3 eggs per leaf) on non-Bt and Bt cottons on older plants. Larval and puparial survivals were not different among Bt and non-Bt cottons. The occurrence and damage of leafminers on cottons in the field showed that L. trifolii infested more plants and leaves and had more mines on non-Bt cotton than on Bt cottons.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bethke, J.A. & Parrella, M.P. (1985) Leaf puncturing, feeding and oviposition behavior of Liriomyza trifolii. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 39, 149154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S., Wu, J., Zhou, B., Huang, J. & Zhang, R. (2000) On the temporal and spatial expression of Bt toxin protein in Bt transgenic cotton. Acta Gossypii Sinica 12, 189193.Google Scholar
Dekebo, A., Kashiwagi, T., Tebayashi, S. & Kim, C.S. (2007) Nitrogenous ovipositional deterrents in the leaves of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) at the mature stage against the leafminer, Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess). Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry 71, 421426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gencsoylu, I. (2003) A new pest, Liriomyza trifolii, on cotton in the Buyuk Menderes Valley, Turkey. Phytoparasitica 31, 330332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, K.A. & Gomez, A.A. (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd edn. 680 pp. New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Greenplate, J.T., Penn, S.R., Mullins, J.W. & Oppenhuizen, M. (2000) Seasonal Cry1Ac levels in DP50B: the Bollgard basis for Bollgard II. pp. 10391041in Dugger, P. & Richter, R. (Eds) Proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Conference. National Cotton Council of America, Memphis, TN, 48 January 2000, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, D.J., Shapiro, J.A., Tingey, W.M. & Mutschler, M.A. (1992) Trichome-borne and artificially applied acylsugars of wild tomato deter feeding and oviposition of the leafminer Liriomyza trifolii. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 65, 6573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeyakumar, P. & Uthamasamy, S. (1996) Ovipositional preference and damage potential of Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) on cotton. Journal of Entomological Research 20, 157161.Google Scholar
Kang, L. (1996) Ecology and Sustainable Control of Serpentine Leafminers. 254 pp. Beijing, China, Science Press.Google Scholar
Kashiwagi, T., Horibata, Y., Mekuria, D.B., Tebayashi, S. & Kim, C.S. (2005a) Ovipositional deterrent in the sweet pepper, Capsicum annuum, at the mature stage against Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess). Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry 69, 18311835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kashiwagi, T., Horibata, Y., Mekuria, D.B., Tebayashi, S. & Kim, C.S. (2005b) Ovipositional deterrent on mature stage of sweet pepper, Capsicum annuum, against Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess). Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences 60, 739742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kashiwagi, T., Mekuria, D.B., Dekebo, A., Sato, K., Tebayashi, S. & Kim, C.S. (2007) A new oviposition deterrent to the leafminer, Liriomyza trifolii: cucurbitane glucoside from Momordica charantia. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences 62, 603607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranthi, K.R., Naidu, S., Dhawad, C.S., Tatwawadi, A., Mate, K., Patil, E., Bharose, A.A., Behere, G.T., Wadaskar, R.M. & Kranthi, S. (2005) Temporal and intra-plant variability of Cry1Ac expression in Bt-cotton and its influence on the survival of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. Current Science 89, 291298.Google Scholar
Lei, Z.R., Zhu, C.J. & Zhang, C.Q. (2007a). Risk analysis of alien invasive Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) in China. Plant Protection 33, 3740.Google Scholar
Lei, Z.R., Yao, J.M., Zhu, C.J. & Wang, H.H. (2007b). Prediction of suitable areas for the Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess), in China. Plant Protection 33, 100103.Google Scholar
Liu, F., Yang, Y.Z., Lu, Y.H., Kang, X.X., Yu, Y.S., Chen, J., Wu, J.Y. & Wan, N.F. (2005) Effects of the transgenic Bt cotton on population dynamics of the cotton leaf-roller Sylepta derogata. Chinese Bulletin of Entomology 42, 275277.Google Scholar
Liu, Y.B., Tabashnik, B.E., Dennehy, T.J., Carriere, Y., Sims, M.A. & Meyer, S.K. (2002) Oviposition on and mining in bolls of Bt and non-Bt cotton by resistant and susceptible pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 95, 143148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mekuria, D.B., Kashiwagi, T., Tebayashi, S. & Kim, C.S. (2005) Cucurbitane triterpenoid oviposition deterrent from Momordica charantia to the leafminer, Liriomyza trifolii. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry 69, 17061710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mekuria, D.B., Kashiwagi, T., Tebayashi, S. & Kim, C.S. (2006) Cucurbitane glucosides from Momordica charantia leaves as oviposition deterrents to the leafminer, Liriomyza trifolii. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Section C, Biosciences 61, 8186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palumbo, J.C. (1992) Identification and occurrence of Liriomyza species associated with cotton in Arizona. Southwestern Entomologist 17, 6970.Google Scholar
Parrella, M.P. (1987). Biology of Liriomyza. Annual Review of Entomology 32, 201224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrella, M.P., Allen, W.W. & Marishita, P. (1981) Leafminer species causes California chrysanthemum growers new problems. California Agriculture 35, 2830.Google Scholar
Parrella, M.P., Robb, K.L. & Bethke, J. (1983) Influence of selected host plants on the biology of Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 76, 112115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrella, M.P., Jones, V.P., Youngman, R.R. & Lebeck, L.M. (1985) Effect of leaf mining and leaf stippling of Liriomyza spp. on photosynthetic rates of chrysanthemum. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 78, 9093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlak, F.J., Deaton, R.W., Armstrong, T.A., Fuchs, R.L., Sims, S.R., Greenplate, J.T. & Fischhoff, D.A. (1990) Insect resistant cotton plants. Biotechnology 8, 939943.Google ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute. (2007) SAS/STAT version 9.1. Cary, NC, USA, SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Sharma, H.C. & Pampapathy, G. (2006). Influence of transgenic cotton on the relative abundance and damage by target and non-target insect pests under different protection regimes in India. Crop Protection 25, 800813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, K.A. (1973) Agromyzidae (Diptera) of Economic Importance. Series Entomology vol. 9. 418 pp. The Hague, The Netherlands, Dr W. Junk BV Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, K., Viraktamath, C.A., Gupta, M. & Tewari, G.C. (1995) Geographical distribution, host range and parasitoids of serpentine leaf miner, Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess) in South India. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems 1, 93100.Google Scholar
Stegmaier, C.E. (1968) A review of recent literature of the host plant range of the genus Liriomyza (Diptera: Agromyzidae) in the continental United States and Hawaii, excluding Alaska. Florida Entomologist 51, 167182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, J.B. & Ruberson, J.R. (2006) Spatial and temporal dynamics of oviposition behavior of bollworm and three of its predators in Bt and non-Bt cotton field. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 120, 1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, F., Xu, J., Feng, H.B. & Zhang, Q.W. (2003) Effects of transgenic Bt cotton on the biology of cotton bollworms in Xinjiang. Entomological Knowledge 40, 131135.Google Scholar
Webster, F.M. & Parks, T.H. (1913) The serpentine leafminer. Journal of Agricultural Research 1, 5987.Google Scholar
Wei, J.N., Zhu, J. & Kang, L. (2006) Volatiles released from bean plants in response to agromyzid files. Planta 224, 279287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, K., Guo, Y., Greenplate, J.T. & Deaton, R. (2003) Efficacy of transgenic cotton containing Cry1Ac gene from Bacillus thuringiensis against Helicoverpa armigera in northern China. Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 13221328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, Y.Q. & Guo, Y.Y. (2000a). Determination of tannin in cotton plant. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 11, 243245.Google ScholarPubMed
Wu, Y.Q. & Guo, Y.Y. (2000b). Potential resistance of tannins-flavoniods in upland cotton against Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Acta Ecologica Sinica 21, 286289.Google Scholar
Xia, L., Xu, Q. & Guo, S. (2005) Bt insecticidal gene and its temporal expression in transgenic cotton plants. Acta Agronomica Sinica 31, 197202.Google Scholar
Yan, F.M., Xu, C.R., Bengtsson, M., Witzgall, P. & Anderson, P. (2002) Volatile compositions of transgenic Bt cotton and their electrophysiological effects on the cotton bollworm. Acta Entomologica Sinica 45, 425429.Google Scholar
Yan, F.M., Bengtsson, M., Anderson, P., Ansebo, L., Xu, C. & Witzgall, P. (2004). Antennal response of cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) to volatiles in transgenic Bt cotton. Journal of Applied Entomology 128, 354357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yathom, S. (1989) New pest and disease records. Liriomyza trifolii on cotton seedlings in Israel. Phytoparasitica 17, 327328.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y.X. & Kang, L. (2003) Olfactory responses of the leafminer Liriomyza sativae (Dipt., Agromyzidae) to the odours of host and non-host plants. Journal of Applied Entomology 127, 8084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zitter, T.A., Tsai, J.H. & Harris, K.F. (1980) Flies. pp. 165176in Harris, K.F. & Maramorosch, K. (Eds) Vectors of Plant Pathogens. New York, USA, Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar