Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:32:36.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of ovarian condition on nesting behaviour in a brood-caring dung beetle, Copris diversus Waterhouse (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Marina Tyndale Biscoe
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, P.O. Box 1700, Canberra City, ACT 2601, Australia

Abstract

Copris diversus Waterh. is a brood-caring dung beetle from Africa, the females remaining in the nest with their brood balls until the young emerge. A technique was developed which allowed access to the nest without interrupting nesting behaviour, so that beetles and nest contents could be observed and dung could be added into or removed from the nest at specific times. At 27°C, if more dung was added to the nest in the first three days after the start of brood care, most beetles continued oviposition. Resorption of the terminal follicle started some time between the third and twelfth days of brood care, and while the terminal follicle was resorbing the beetles did not revert to breeding if supplied with additional dung. Subsequent follicles were also resorbed if brood care was allowed to continue beyond ten days, but their resorption did not impose a lengthy delay in breeding. Oviposition resumed 17 to 21 days after the start of brood care, irrespective of when the dung was added. Development of new follicles following follicle resorption took three to seven days, and thus the resorption of the terminal follicle must have taken about seven to fifteen days.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, W. J. & Bohm, M. K. (1975). Oosorption in insects. — Biol. Rev. 50, 373396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halffter, G. & Matthews, E. G.. (1966). The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae).— Folia ent. Mex. no. 12—14, 312 pp.Google Scholar
Huerta, C., Anduaga, S. & Halffter, G.. (1981). Relaciones entre nidificación y ovario en Copris (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae).— Folia ent. Mex. no. 47, 139170.Google Scholar
Lindquist, A. W.. (1935). Notes on the habits of certain coprophagous beetles and methods of rearing them.—Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 351, 10 pp.Google Scholar
Tyndale-Biscoe, M.Wallace, M. M. H. & Walker, J. M.. (1981). An ecological study of an Australian dung beetle, Onthophagus granulatus Boheman (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), using physiological age-grading techniques.— Bull. ent. Res. 71,137152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyndale-Biscoe, M. & Watson, J. A. L.. (1977). Extra-ovariolar egg resorption in a dung beetle, Euoniticellus intermedius.—J. Insect Physiol. 23, 11631167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar