Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:32:07.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of juvenile hormone mimics on the codling moth Cydia Pomonella (L.) (Lep., Olethreutidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

I. Gelbič  and
F. Sehnal
I. Gelbič
Affiliation:
Institute of Entomology, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Viničná 7, Praha 2, Czechoslovakia
F. Sehnal
Affiliation:
Institute of Entomology, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Viničná 7, Praha 2, Czechoslovakia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory experiments with juvenile hormone analogues on Cydia pomonella (L.) showed that Cecropia C17 juvenile hormone (methyl 10,ll-epoxy-3,7,ll-trimethyl-2,6-dodecadienoate) was the most active of the 28 compounds tested. When applied to four-hour-old eggs at 0.1 μg/egg, the hormone caused 100% failure in embryogenesis, while the other compounds were at least five times less effective. Depending on the time since ecdysis and the dose, juvenile hormone mimics applied to last-instar larvae resulted in a wide range of intermediate forms. Against three-day-old last-instar larvae, the Cecropia C17 hormone gave 100% inhibition of development at a dose of 1 μg/larva, while three other compounds (methyl 10,11-epoxy-3,7,11-trimethyl-2,6-dodecadienoate, ethyl 11-chloro-3,7,11-trimethyl-2-dodecenoate and ethyl 3,7,11-tri-methyl-2,4-dodecadienoate) gave the same effect at 2–5 μg/larva. Against newly emerged adults, the last two compounds at 10–50 μg/insect reduced fecundity and fertility to 0–81% and 0–50%, respectively, of their normal levels.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , August 1973 , pp. 7 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowers, W. S. (1971). Juvenile hormones. In Jacobson, M. & Crosby, D. G. (Ed). Naturally occurring insecticides, pp. 307–332. New York, Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Butt, B. A., Hathaway, O., White, L. D. & Howell, J. F. (1970). Field releases of codling moths sterilized by tepa or gamma irradiation, 1964–67. – J. econ. Ent. 63, 912–915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desëo, K. V. (1971). Study of factors influencing the fecundity and fertility of codling moth (Laspeyresia pomonella L., Lepid.; Tortr.). – Acta Phytopathol Acad. Sci Hung. 6, 243–252.Google Scholar
Huber, J., Benz, G. & Schmid, K. (1972). Zuchtmethode und semisynthetische Nährmedien für Apfelwickler. – Experientia 28, 1260–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarolím, V., Hejno, J., Sehnal, F. & Šorm, F. (1969). Natural and synthetic materials with insect hormones activity. 8. Juvenile activity of the farnesane-type compounds on Galleria mellonella. – Life Sci. (2) 8, 831–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masner, P. (1969). The effect of substances with juvenile hormone activity on morphogenesis and function of gonads in Pyrrhocoris apterus (Heteroptera). – Acta ent. bohemoslov. 66, 81–86.Google Scholar
Metwally, M. M., Sehnal, F. & Landa, V. (1973). Reduction of fecundity and the control of the khapra beetle by the juvenile hormone mimics. – J. econ. Ent. 65, 1603–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novák, K. & Sehnal, F. (1973). Action of the juvenile hormone analogues on Europroctis chryssorrhoea and Yponomeuta malinella under field conditions. – Acta ent. bohemoslov. 70, 20–29.Google Scholar
Patterson, J. W. (1971). Critical sensitivity of the ovary of Aedes aegypti adults to sterilization by juvenile hormone mimics. – Nature, New Biology 233, 176–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proverbs, M. D., Newton, J. R. & Logan, D. M. (1969). Codling moth control by release of radiation-sterilized moths in a commercial apple orchard. – J. econ. Ent. 62, 1331–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Retnakaran, A. (1970). Blocking of embryonic development in the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), by some compounds with juvenile hormone activity. – Can. Ent. 102, 1592–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddiford, L. M. & Williams, C. M. (1967). The effects of juvenile hormone analogues on the embryonic development of silkworms. – Proc. natn. Acad Sci. U.S.A. 57, 595–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roelofs, W., Comeau, A., Hill, A. & Milicevic, G. (1971). Sex attractant of the codling moth: characterization with electroantennogram technique. – Science, N.Y. 174, 297–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohdendorf, E. B. & Sehnal, F. (1972). The induction of ovarian dysfunctions in Thermobia domestica by the Cecropia juvenile hormones. – Experientia 28, 1099–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sláma, K. (1971). Insect juvenile hormone analogues – A. Rev. Biochem. 40, 1079–1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sláma, K. & Williams, C. M. (1966). “Paper factor” as an inhibitor of the embryonic development of the European bug, Pyrrhocoris apterus. – Nature, Lond. 210, 329–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varjas, L. & Sehnal, F. (1973). Use of a juvenile hormone analogue against the fall webworm, Hyphantria cunea. – Entomologia exp. appl. 16, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, W.F. & Bowers, W.S. (1970). Synthetic juvenile hormones as potential coleopteran ovicides. – J econ. Ent. 63, 1231–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellington, W.G. & Maelzer, D. A. (1967). Effects of farnesyl methyl ether on the reproduction of the western tent caterpillar, Malacosoma pluviale: some physiological, ecological, and practical implications. – Can. Ent. 99, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar