Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:29:41.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of atmospheric Pressure on the Flight Responses of Aëdes aegypti (L.)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

W. O. Haufe
W. O. Haufe
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Laboratory investigations with the mosquito AËdes aegypti (L.) have shown that air pressure has the following effects on flight activity:

The effects of pressure changes are consistently large enough to constitute an important factor in determining activity provided the mosquitos are acclimatised first to a particular pressure level.

The period of constant conditions necessary for complete acclimatisation was between three and six hours for all pressure conditions investigated.

When the period of acclimatisation had been fulfilled, the flight activity was approximately the same at all levels of static pressure investigated between 550 mm. and 800 mm. Hg.

After complete acclimatisation the activity following a moderate decrease in pressure was 1·5 to 2·4 times that following a similar increase in pressure when the general pressure level exceeded 735 mm. Hg.

When the general pressure level was less than 735 mm. Hg., the activity following a decrease in pressure was less than that following an increase; it would appear that 735 mm. is a critical pressure level for the stock of A. aegypti employed.

The activity during a uniform rise in pressure from 530 mm. to 730 mm. at 7·7 mm. /min. was at least 10 times that during a reverse fall in pressure fall in pressure at the same uniform rate.

Provided the rate of change was not greater than 1 mm./sec., the maximum flight activity for falling pressures was observed at 780 mm. while the maximumfor rising pressures was observed at 735 mm.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , September 1954 , pp. 507 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Back, E. A. & Cotton, R. T. (1925). The use of vacuum for insect control.—J. agric. Res., 31, pp. 1035–1041.Google Scholar
Cleveland, L. R. (1925). Toxicity of oxygen for Protozoa in vivo and in vitro; animals defaunated without injury.—Biol. Bull., Wood's Hole, 48, pp. 455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, F. J. (1906). The bionomics of grain weevils.—J. econ. Biol., 1, pp. 63–71.Google Scholar
Glick, P. A. (1939). The distribution of insects, spiders and mites in the air.—Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., no. 673, 150 pp.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M. Jr (1906). The effects of rapid decompression on larvae.—J. Physiol., 35, (vi).Google Scholar
Herrera, A. L. & Lope, D. V. (1899). La vie sur les hauts plateaux.—Mexico City.Google Scholar
Huber, F. (1814). Nouvelles observations sur les abeilles.—2nd edn., 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Lehmann, N. & Vaney, C. (1911). Relations entre les conditions climatériques et la fréquence des larves de I'hypoderme du boeuf.—C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 152, pp. 1508–1510.Google Scholar
Lutz, F. E. (1929). Experiments with “ wonder creatures”.—Nat. Hist., N. Y., 29, pp. 160–168.Google Scholar
Parman, D. C. (1920). Observations on the effect of strom phenomena on insect activity.—J. econ. Ent., 13, pp. 339–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pictet, A. (1918). Le dévelopment des Lépidoptères: le rôle de la température; en relation avec la pression barométrique.—C. R. Soc. Phys. Hist. nat. Genéve, 34, pp. 32–34.Google Scholar
Roller, L. W. (1906). Respiratory responses in the grasshopper to variations in pressure.—Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull., 3, pp. 211–221.Google Scholar
Wellington, W. G. (1944). Barotaxis in Diptera, and its possible significance to economic entomology.—Nature, Lond., 154, pp. 671–672.Google Scholar
Wellington, W. G. (1945). Conditions governing the distribution of insects in the free atmosphere. Pt. I. Atmospheric pressure, temperature and humidity.—Canad. Ent., 77, pp. 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellington, W. G. (1946 a). The effects of variations in atmospheric pressure upon insects.—Canad. J. Res., (D) 24, pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
Wellington, W. G. (1946 b). Some reactions of muscoid Diptera to changes in atmospheric pressure.—Canad. J. Res., (D) 24, pp. 105–117.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1940). An analysis of four years' captures of insects in a light trap. Pt. II. The effect of weather conditions on insects activity.—Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond., 90, pp. 227–306.Google Scholar
Woodworth, C. E. (1932). Some effects of reduced atmospheric pressure upon honey bee respiration.—J. econ. Ent., 25, pp. 1036–1042Google Scholar
Woodworth, C. E. (1936). Effect of reduced temperature and pressure on honey bee respiration.—J. econ. Ent., 29, pp. 1128–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar