Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:12:30.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distribution and ecology of Ornithodoros moubata porcinus Walton (Acarina) in animal burrows in East Africa*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. A. Peirce
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, The Central Veterinary Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, New Haw, Weybridge, Surrey KT15 3NB, England

Abstract

In a survey of animal burrows in nine East African game areas or ranches 112621 specimens of Ornithodoros moubata pordnus Walton, vector of African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV), were collected from 172 burrows (out of 442 examined) in six areas. Burrows were usually located in open ground, in patches of scrub thicket and frequently in termite mounds; often the burrows had been excavated originally by antbear. Ticks were obtained by means of a lure, by chipping samples from the burrow walls and by taking soil samples from the burrow floors. Tick populations ranged from a few individuals to 250000 per burrow, second- and third-stage nymphae accounting for over 70% of the total population. Generally, ticks were found near the entrances of burrows on the floor, or on the roofs if the burrows had been unoccupied for some time, the latter position appearing to be a hunger response. Factors favouring large tick populations were neutral soils, high relative humidity, optimal temperature to be found at 3000–5000 ft above sea level, vegetation surrounding the burrow and the presence of burrow-inhabiting animals. Above 5000 ft O. m. porcinus was less common, and above 6150 ft none was found. Blood-meal identifications have shown warthog to be the primary host; other hosts included antbear, porcupine and hyaena. In areas with a particularly favourable environment the ticks can remain quiescent for long periods; in less favourable areas the continued maintenance of colonies is dependent upon the frequency with which ticks can feed on a suitable host. Some predation of adult ticks occurs but losses due to bush fires are not important. Heavy infestations of ticks may contribute to the mortality of young warthogs. The survey confirms experimental evidence that ASFV is well adapted to maintenance in the vector population.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, G. D. & Talbot, L. M. (1965). Soil factors affecting the distribution of the grassland types and their utilization by wild animals on the Serengeti Plains, Tanganyika.—J. Ecol. 53, 3356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon. (1962 a). East Africa, Geology. 1:4,000,000. Directorate of Overseas Surveys. DOS 299F. In Russell, E. W. (Ed.) The natural resources of East Africa. Nairobi, E. A. Hawkins.Google Scholar
Anon. (1962 b). East Africa, Soils. 1:400,000. Directorate of Overseas Surveys. DOS 299G. In Russell, E. W. (Ed.) The natural resources of East Africa. Nairobi, E. A. Hawkins.Google Scholar
Anon. (1962 c). Atlas of Kenya. Nairobi. Survey of Kenya.Google Scholar
Anon. (1967 a). Atlas of Tanzania. Dar Es Salaam. Surveys and Mapping Division, Ministry of Lands, Settlement and Water Development.Google Scholar
Anon. (1967 b). Atlas of Uganda. Kampala Department of Lands and Surveys, Uganda. 2nd Ed.Google Scholar
Botija, C. S. (1965). Present characteristics of African swine fever in Spain.—13 pp. FAO/OIE Int. Meet. Hog Cholera and African Swine Fever. Rome. No. 15.Google Scholar
Chorley, T. W. (1943). An unusual occurrence of Ornithodoros moubata (Arachnida).—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. A 18, 27.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, N. & Nuttall, G. H. F. (1921). Some observations on the biology and structure of Ornithodorus moubata, Murray, together with a note on the external characters which serve to differentiate the sexes.—Parasitology 13, 327347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, C. R. & Laws, R. M. (1970). The distribution of the larger herbivores in the Queen Elizabeth National Park, Uganda.—J. appl. Ecol. 7, 273294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnham, P. C. C. (1926). Susceptibility of Ornithodorus to fire.—Kenya med. J. 3, 265266.Google Scholar
Geigy, R. (1955). Observations sur les phacochères du Tanganyika.—Rev. suisse Zool. 62, 139163.Google Scholar
Geigy, R. & Mooser, H. (1955). Studies on the epidemiology of African relapsing fever in Tanganyika.—J. trap. Med. Hyg. 58, 199201.Google ScholarPubMed
Harrop, J. F. (1960). The soils of the western province of Uganda.—79+27 pp. Mem. Res. Div. Dep. Agric. Uganda. Ser. 1, Soils, no. 6.Google Scholar
Heisch, R. B. & Grainger, W. E. (1950). On the occurrence of Ornithodoros moubata Murray in burrows.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 44, 153155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heuschele, W. P. & Coggins, L. (1965). Studies on the transmission of African swine fever virus by arthropods.—Proc. U.S. livestk sanit. Ass. 69, 94100.Google Scholar
Hoogstraal, H. (1954). Noteworthy African tick records in the British Museum (Natural History) collections.—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 56, 273279.Google Scholar
Hoogstraal, H. (1956). African Ixodoidea Vol. 1. Ticks of the Sudan.—1101 pp. Research Report. NM. 005.050.29.07. U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3. Cairo.Google Scholar
Hopkins, G. H. E. & Chorley, T. W. (1940). Experiments on the destruction of ticks.—E. Afr. med. J. 17, 7180.Google Scholar
Jarman, P. J. (1970). In ‘Serengeti Research Institute.’—Annual Report 1969. Tanzania National Parks.Google Scholar
Kinghorn, A., Yorke, W., Lloyd, L. (1913). Final report of the Luangwa Sleeping Sickness Commission of the British South Africa Company 1911–1912.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 7, 183302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, H. S. (1952). The recorded distribution of Ornithodoros moubata (Murray) (Acarina).—Bull. ent. Res. 43, 407411.Google Scholar
Lloyd, L. (1915). On the association of warthog and the nkufu tick (Ornithodorus moubata).—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 9, 559560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellanby, K. (1935). The structure and function of the spiracles of the tick, Ornithodoros moubata Murray.—Parasitology 27, 288290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriman, G. (1911). The geographical distribution of Ornithodorus moubata (Murray, 1877).—Parasitology 4, 168173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, R. E. (1921). On a form of swine fever occurring in British East Africa (Kenya Colony).—J. comp. Path. Ther. 34, 159191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, E. (1970). The banded mongoose, Mungos mungo Gmelin.—E. Afr. Wildlife J. 8, 6371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, M. A. (1971). Ornithodoros moubata porcinus (Walton) (sensu van der Merwe). Observations on the distribution and ecology in animal burrows in East Africa, and the role of this tick in the transmission of African swine fever virus.—181 pp. Thesis, Fellowship of the Institute of Medical Laboratory, Technology, London.Google Scholar
Phipps, J. (1950). Ornithodoros moubata Murray in Tanganyika.—E. Afr. med. J. 27, 475482.Google ScholarPubMed
Plowright, W., Parker, J., Peirce, M. A. (1969 a). African Swine Fever Virus in ticks (Ornithodoros moubata, Murray) collected from animal burrows in Tanzania.—Nature (Lond.) 221. 10711073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plowright, W., Parker, J. & Peirce, M. A. (1969 b). The epizootiology of African swine fever in Africa.—Vet. Rec. 85, 668674.Google Scholar
Plowright, W., Perry, C. T. & Greig, A. (1974). Sexual transmission of African swine fever virus in the tick, Ornithodoros moubata porcinus, Walton.—Res. vet. Sci. 17, 106113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plowright, W., Perry, C. T., Peirce, M. A. & Parker, J. (1970 a). Experimental infection of the Argasid tick, Ornithodoros moubata porcinus, with African swine fever virus.—Arch. ges. Virusforsch. 31, 3350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plowright, W., Perry, C. T. & Peirce, M. A. (1970 b). Transovarial infection with African swine fever virus in the Argasid tick, Ornithodoros moubata porcinus, Walton.—Res. vet. Sci. 11, 582584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pratt, D. J., Greenway, P. J. & Gwynne, M. D. (1966). A classification of East African rangeland, with an appendix on terminology.—J. appl. Ecol. 3, 369382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodhain, J. (1922). La subsistence de l'Ornithodorus moubata sur des reptiles et des sauriens.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 15, 560564.Google Scholar
Schwetz, J. (1933). Notes parasitologiques sur la plaine du Lac Edouard (Pare National Albert, Congo Beige).—Revue Zool. Bot. afr. 23, 259266.Google Scholar
Van Der Merwe, S. (1968). Some remarks on the ‘tampans’ of the Ornithodoros moubata complex in Southern Africa.—Zool. Anz. 181, 280289.Google Scholar
Van Hoof, L. (1924). Conservation du pouvoir infectieux de I'Ornithodorus moubata nourri sur reptiles et sauriens.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 17, 376378.Google Scholar
Walton, G. A. (1953). Ornithodorus moubata in wart-hog and porcupine burrows in Tanganyika Territory.—Trans. R. Soc. trap. Med. Hyg., 47, 410411.Google Scholar
Walton, G. A. (1957). Observations on biological variation in Ornithodoros moubata (Murr.)(Argasidae) in East Africa.—Bull. ent. Res. 48, 669710.Google Scholar
Walton, G. A. (1958). Studies on Ornithodorus moubata Murray (Argasidae) in East Africa.Part I.E. Afr. med. J. 35, 5784.Google Scholar
Walton, G. A. (1960). The reaction of some variants of Ornithodoros moubata Murray (Argasidae, Ixodoidea) to desiccation.—Parasitology 50, 8188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, G. A. (1962). The Ornithodoros moubata superspecies problem in relation to human relapsing fever epidemiology.—Symp. zool. Soc. Lond. 6, 83156.Google Scholar
Wellman, F. C. (1906). On a hemipterous insect which preys upon blood-sucking arthropods and which occasionally attacks mammals (man).—J. trop. Med. Hyg. 9, 9798.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, P. R. (1970). A preliminary note on predation on free-living engorged female Rocky Mountain wood ticks.—J. med. Entomol. 7, 493496.Google Scholar
Woodhead, T. (1970). A classification of East African rangeland. II. The water balance as a guide to site potential.—J. appl. Ecol. 7, 647652.Google Scholar