Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:42:41.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differences in laboratory performance between strains of Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood from Rhodesia and Tanzania and associated chromosome diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A. M. Jordan ,
M. A. Trewern ,
D. I. Southern ,
P. E. Pell  and
E. D. G. Davies
A. M. Jordan
Affiliation:
Tsetse Research Laboratory, University of Bristol, School of Veterinary Science, Langford, Bristol, BS18 7DU, U.K.
M. A. Trewern
Affiliation:
Tsetse Research Laboratory, University of Bristol, School of Veterinary Science, Langford, Bristol, BS18 7DU, U.K.
D. I. Southern
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, U.K.
P. E. Pell
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, U.K.
E. D. G. Davies
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract

A laboratory colony of Glossina morsitans morsitans Westw. which originated from puparia collected near Kariba, Rhodesia was more productive than another colony which originated from Handeni, northern Tanzania; during 1975, the former produced an average of 5–9 puparia per female and the latter 3–6. Although mortality in the Tanzanian colony was somewhat higher than in the Rhodesian colony, the main reason for the lower productivity of the Tanzanian colony was the much poorer fecundity of the females. This was associated with abnormalities of the reproductive system. The differences in laboratory performance between the two stocks were probably a reflection of their genetic diversity. Thus the Tanzanian Y chromosome is metacentric compared with the almost acrocentric Y chromosome of Rhodesian males, and some individuals carry small metacentric supernumerary chromosomes which are not present in Rhodesian flies. Giemsa C-banding showed band differences between the chromosome complements of the two stocks. Probably the most important difference, revealed by polytene chromosome analysis, is a large inversion in the X chromosome of Tanzanian flies, which, together with at least one band difference, is fixed in the homozygous condition. The possible evolutionary pathways of these mutations are outlined and their significance is discussed in terms of their distribution in nature and of the performance of the two strains in the laboratory.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , March 1977 , pp. 35 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burchard, R. P.. & Baldry, D. A. T.. (1970). Polytene chromosomes of Glossina palpalis Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Muscidae) I. The preliminary demonstration. — Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 45, 182–183.Google Scholar
Curtis, C. F.. (1972). Sterility from crosses between sub-species of the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans. — Acta trop. 29, 250–268.Google ScholarPubMed
Dame, D. A.. & Schmidt, C. H.. (1970). The sterile-male technique against tsetse flies, Glossina spp. — Bull. ent. Soc. Amer. 16, 24–30.Google Scholar
Foster, W. A.. (1974). Surgical inhibition of ovulation and gestation in the tsetse fly Glossina austeni Newst. (Dipt., Glossinidae). — Bull. ent. Res. 63, 483–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geest, L. P. S.. Van Der, & Kawooya, J.. (1975). Genetic variation in some enzyme systems in the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans. — Entomologia exp. appl. 18, 508–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haring, A.. (1970). The cytogenetics of the tsetse flies, G. m. orientalis and G. austeni. — M.Sc. thesis. Univ. Salford.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. M.. & Curtis, C. F.. (1968). Productivity of Glossina austeni Newst. maintained on lop-eared rabbits. — Bull. ent. Res. 58, 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, A. M., Nash, T. A. M.. & Trewern, M. A.. (1970). The performance of crosses between wild and laboratory-bred Glossina morsitans orientalis Vanderplank. — Bull. ent. Res. 60, 333–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machado, A. de B.. (1970). Les races géographiques de Glossina morsitans. — Proc. 1st int. symp. on tsetse fly breeding under laboratory conditions, Lisbon. 1969. 471–486.Google Scholar
Nash, T. A. M.., Jordan, A. M.. & Boyle, J. A.. (1966). A promising method for rearing Glossina austeni (Newst.) on a small scale, based on the use of rabbits' ears for feeding. — Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 60, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, T. A. M.., Jordan, A. M.. & Boyle, J. A.. (1968). The large-scale rearing of Glossina austeni Newst. in the laboratory. IV– The final technique. — Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 62, 336–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newton, M. E.., Southern, D. I.. & Wood, R. J.. (1974). X and Y chromosomes of Aedes aegypti (L.) distinguished by Giemsa C–banding. — Chromosoma. 49, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riordan, K.. (1970). Polytene chromosomes of Glossina palpalis Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Muscidae). II. Their improved demonstration. — Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 45 184–186.Google Scholar
Saunders, D. S.. (1960). The ovulation cycle in Glossina morsitans Westwood (Diptera: Muscidae) and a possible method of age determination for female tsetse flies by the examination of their ovaries. — Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 112, 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southern, D. I.., Craig-Cameron, T. A.. & Pell, P. E.. (1972). The meiotic sequence in Glossina morsitans morsitans. — Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 66, 145–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southern, D. I.. & Pell, P. E.. (1973). Chromosome relationships and meiotic mechanisms of certain morsitans group tsetse flies and their hybrids. — Chromosoma. 44, 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southern, D. I.. & Pell, P. E.. (1974). Comparative analysis of the polytene chromosomes of Glossina austeni and Glossina morsitans morsitans. — Chromosoma. 47, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southern, D. I.., Pell, P. E.. & CraigCameron, T. A.. (1973). Polytene chromosomes of the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans morsitans. — Chromosoma 40, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sturtevant, A. H.. (1925). The effects of unequal crossing over at the bar locus in Drosophila. — Genetics, Princeton. 10, 117–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanderplank, F. L.. (1948). Experiments in cross-breeding tsetse-flies (Glossina species). — Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 42, 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, D. L.. (1974). The biology and mass rearing of Glossina morsitans in Tanzania. — Proc. III int. Congr. Parasitology, Munich. 941.Google Scholar