Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:09:53.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Development and Fecundity of the Oriental Fruit Moth, Grapholitha (Cydia) molesta (Busck) under Controlled Temperatures and Humidities*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Extract

A study of the development and fecundity of the Oriental Fruit Moth, Grapholitha molesta (Busck), under controlled temperatures of 60°, 65°, 75°, 85° and 95°F. and relative humidities of 35, 70 and 100 per cent, was carried out at East Lansing, Michigan, in 1950–51. The technique adopted is described. The incubation period of the eggs decreased from 7–8 days at 60°F. to 2–76 days at 94°F., increasing to 3–56 days at 95°F. A large number of eggs withstood an exposure of 40 hours at 98°F., but an exposure of 48 hours proved fatal. An exposure of 21 hours to 105°F. reduced the viability of eggs to 25–43 per cent, and increased the incubation period by 36–40 hours.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alden, C. H. & Clarke, W. H. (1931). The life history and control of the Oriental Fruit Moth.—Bull. Ga Bd Ent., no. 74, 23 pp.Google Scholar
Allee, W. C., Emerson, A. E., Park, O., Park, T. & Schmidt, K. P. (1949). Principles of animal ecology.—837 pp. Philadelphia, Saunders.Google Scholar
Cutright, C. R. (1937). Codling Moth biology and control investigations.—Bull. Ohio agric. Exp. Sta., no. 583, 45 pp.Google Scholar
Dickson, R. C. (1950). Factors governing the induction of diapause in the Oriental Fruit Moth.—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer., 42, pp. 511537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dustan, G. G. & Armstrong, T. (1933). Observations on the relation of temperature and moisture to the Oriental Peach Moth.—63rd Rep. ent. Soc. Ont., 1932, pp. 2939.Google Scholar
Eddy, C. O. & Nettles, W. C. (1931). Biological studies of the Oriental Fruit Moth, 1930.—Bull. S. C. agric. Exp. Sta., no. 278, 21 pp.Google Scholar
Froggatt, W. W. (1914). The Peach Tip Moth.—Agric. Gaz. N.S.W., 25, pp. 413414.Google Scholar
Garman, P. (1917). The oriental peach pest (Laspeyresia molesta Busck), a dangerous new fruit insect of Maryland.—Bull. Md agric. Exp. Sta. no. 209, 16 pp.Google Scholar
Garman, P. (1930). The Oriental Peach Moth in Connecticut.—Bull. Conn. agric. Exp. Sta., no. 313, pp. 401451.Google Scholar
Glenn, P. A. (1922). Codling-moth investigations of the State Entomologist's Office, 1915, 1916, 1917Bull. Ill. nat. Hist. Surv., 14, pp. 219289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeussler, G. J. (1940). General information concerning the Oriental Fruit Moth in Japan and Chosen.—J. econ. Ent., 33, pp. 189193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harukawa, C. (1923). Second notes on the Oriental Peach Moth, Laspeyresia molesta Busck.—Ber. Ōhara Inst., 2, pp. 235258.Google Scholar
Harukawa, C. (1929). Relation of temperature to the growth of Oriental Peach Moth. I.—Ber. Ōhara Inst., 4, pp. 6794.Google Scholar
Heinrich, C. (1926). Revision of the North American moths of the subfamilies Laspeyresiinae and Olethreutinae.—Bull. U.S. nat. Mus., no. 132, p. 28.Google Scholar
Hodgman, C. D.Ed. (1949). Handbook of chemistry and physics, p. 1951.—Cleveland, Ohio, Chem. Eubber Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Isely, D.. (1939). Timing seasonal occurrence and abundance of the Codling Moth.—Bull. Ark. agric. Exp. Sta., no. 382, 26 pp.Google Scholar
Krogh, A. (1914). On the influence of temperature on the rate of embryonic development.—Z. allg. Physiol., 16, pp. 163177.Google Scholar
Newcomer, E. J. & Whitcomb, W. D. (1924). Life history of the Codling Moth in the Yakima Valley of Washington.—Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., no. 1235, 76 pp.Google Scholar
Peterson, A. & Haeussler, G. J. (1930). Life history of the Oriental Peach Moth at Eiverton, N.J., in relation to temperature.—Tech. Bull. U.S.Dep. Agric., no. 183, 37 pp.Google Scholar
Quaintance, A. L. & Wood, W. B. (1916). Laspeyresia molesta, an important new insect enemy of the peach.—J. agric. Ees., 7, pp. 373377.Google Scholar
Sanderson, E. D. & Peaiks, L. M. (1913). The relation of temperature to insect life.—Tech. Bull. N.H. agric. Exp. Sta., no. 7, 125 pp.Google Scholar
Shelfoed, V. E. (1927). An experimental investigation of the relations of the Codling Moth to weather and climate.—Bull. Ill. nat. Hist. Surv., 16, pp. 311440.Google Scholar
Snapp, O. I. & Swingle, H. S. (1929). Life history of the Oriental Peach Moth in Georgia.—Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., no. 152, 16 pp.Google Scholar
Squike, F. A. (1940). Observations on the larval diapause of the Pink Bollworm, Platyedra gossypiella, Saund.—Bull. ent. Res., 30, pp. 475481.Google Scholar
Stearns, L. A. (1921). The life-history of the Oriental Fruit Moth in northern Virginia.—Tech. Bull. Va agric. Exp. Sta., no. 21, 46 pp.Google Scholar
Stearns, L. A. & Neiswander, E. B. (1930). Oriental Fruit Moth investigations in Ohio. I.Bull. Ohio agric Exp. Sta., no. 457, 36 pp.Google Scholar
Stearns, L. A. & Peterson, A. (1928). The seasonal life history of the Oriental Fruit Moth in New Jersey during 1924, 1925 and 1926.—Bull. N.J. agric. Exp. Sta., no. 455, 48 pp.Google Scholar
Uvarov, B. P. (1931). Insects and climate.—Trans, ent. Soc. Lond., 79, pp. 1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, W. B. & Selkregg, E. R. (1918). Further notes on Laspeyresia molesta.—J. agric. Ees., 13, pp. 5972.Google Scholar