Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:34:38.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detection and substrate portrayal on the serum phenoloxidase activity from the grub of rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2023

Balashanmuga Nehru Marieshwari
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai 600025, India
Chandran Prithi
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai 600025, India
Ramanathan Nivetha
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai 600025, India
Sreeramulu Bhuvaragavan
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai 600025, India
Janarthanan Sundaram*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai 600025, India
*
Corresponding author: Janarthanan Sundaram; E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phenoloxidase (PO) is a significant biomolecule involved in humoral defence mechanism of invertebrates. Spontaneous melanization of insect haemolymph is the major hinderance for studying PO activity, as haemolymph was collected devoid of phenylthiourea. In the study, no visible melanization was observed in crude serum from the grub of Oryctes rhinoceros up to 30 min of incubation amongst crude haemolymph, diluted haemolymph, crude serum and diluted serum that were subjected to visual observation for spontaneous melanization reaction. Accordingly, crude serum was taken for evaluating PO activity. At the same time, as PO substrates tend to auto-oxidize and provide false optical density value, tris-buffered saline devoid of any substrates were used as blank for PO assays. The ideal wavelength at which maximum PO activity occurred for each substrate, namely, tyrosine, tyramine, dopamine, L-dopa, DL-dopa, catechol, protocatechuic acid and pyrogallol was determined as 407, 410, 429, 465, 403, 466, 428 and 400 nm, respectively. Additionally, time course of oxidation for each phenolic substrate by the serum PO were examined and DL-dopa was identified as the specific substrate for serum PO in the grub of O. rhinoceros. Furthermore, maximum PO activity was observed at 5 min of incubation for 10 mM of DL-dopa that was considered as optimum concentration. The ideal pH and temperature for serum PO activity was observed as 7.5 and 20°C, respectively. These results suggested that standardizing a suitable substrate is an essential prerequisite to evaluate the real PO activity of serum which might significantly fluctuate in each insect model.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Insects were among the first successful air-breathing land animals that inevitably make earth adaptable to the founding and evolution of species of a higher order, including Homo sapiens, without which our planet would have devolved to an inert, lifeless, barren rock. They are the most diverse group of organisms making up to approximately 80% of all living beings and are ubiquitous in nature. This makes them susceptible to an innumerable number of pathogens and they overcome by having an extensive innate immune system that consists of physical barrier, humoral and cellular responses. One such extensive cascade is the phenoloxidase system. Enzyme phenoloxidase (PO) is a physiologically significant molecule in humoral defence mechanism of invertebrates (Cerenius et al., Reference Cerenius, Lee and Soderhall2008). It is a copper-containing enzyme, usually present in a zymogen form known as prophenoloxidase (proPO) (Sugumaran and Nellaiappan, Reference Sugumaran and Nellaiappan1990). They get activated by non-self and self-recognition mechanism of the host body (González-Santoyo and Córdoba-Aguilar, Reference González-Santoyo and Córdoba-Aguilar2012). When highly conserved microbial structural motifs referred as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) get recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that are present in the host body, it triggers the activation of a cascade of serine proteases which further activates PO activating enzymes and, therefore, the conversion of the proenzyme takes place from proPO into PO (Cerenius et al., Reference Cerenius, Lee and Soderhall2008; Baruah et al., Reference Baruah, Sarma, Bardoloi and Bora2019). Activated PO catalyses two kinds of reactions, namely, hydroxylation of mono-phenols and its oxidation to o-diphenols and further oxidation of o-diphenols to o-quinones, then the quinones are non-enzymatically polymerized to melanin (Hung and Boucias, Reference Hung and Boucias1996). During this reaction, various toxic melanin derivatives like dopa-quinone, indole-quinone and semi-quinone are released. All these have cytotoxic properties damaging invading pathogens (Vavricka et al., Reference Vavricka, Christensen and Li2010). Activated PO then involves in the processes like melanization (Ashida and Brey, Reference Ashida and Brey1998), sclerotization (Sugumaran and Nellaiappan, Reference Sugumaran and Nellaiappan2000; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Xue, Zhang, Yu and Luo2010), encapsulation (Sugumaran, Reference Sugumaran2002; Strand, Reference Strand2008), nodulation (Mullen and Goldsworthy, Reference Mullen and Goldsworthy2003) and wound healing (Ashida and Brey, Reference Ashida and Brey1995; Sugumaran et al., Reference Sugumaran, Tan and Sun1996).

Adults of Oryctes rhinoceros (Linnaeus, 1758) commonly known as Asiatic rhinoceros beetle or coconut rhinoceros beetle, is one of the most notorious pests of coconut palm (Cocos nucifera) and African oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) (Huger, Reference Huger1966; Reference Huger2005) belongs to the superfamily Scarabaeoidea of order Coleoptera. It is also a minor pest of a number of other crop plants such as Acanthophoenix rubra (barbel palm), Ananas comosus (pineapple), Arenya pinnata (sugar palm), Musa species (banana), Saccharum species (sugarcane), Phoenix sylvestris (wild date palm), Causuarina (Austrian pine), etc. (Gressitt, Reference Gressitt1953). Thus, there are 29 host plant genera for O. rhinoceros, of which, 16 are palm varieties (Goonewardena, Reference Goonewardena1958). Although the adults are serious pest of palm crops, grubs from O. rhinoceros are increasingly known for bioconversion of wastes. Grubs are voracious feeders and they convert a higher proportion of compost into biomass (Ganesh et al., Reference Ganesh, Bhuvaragavan, Ramaraj and Janarthanan2021). The grubs usually are found in dead standing coconut palms, fallen coconut logs and rotting coconut stumps and also in piles of sawdust and cow dung manure (Gressitt, Reference Gressitt1953). As a result, it is believed that these grubs that are living in such hostile environments must have developed an efficient self-defence system against microbial infections (Shelomi et al., Reference Shelomi, Lin and Liu2019; Bhuvaragavan et al., Reference Bhuvaragavan, Sruthi, Nivetha, Ramaraj, Hilda, Meenakumari and Janarthanan2023).

Therefore, the grub of the insect O. rhinoceros, is chosen as a potential model for evaluating PO activity. Although, crude PO activity was reported in O. rhinoceros, it was limited only to the cuticular level (Jeyaraj et al., Reference Jeyaraj, Thangaraj, Vasuki and Aruchami1986; Longankumar et al., Reference Longankumar, Thangaraj, Manimegalai, Aruchami and Vinayakam1996). The circulatory system of insects is regarded as the significant site of immune responses toward pathogenic invasion. Information pertaining to circulatory PO in the grub of O. rhinoceros is absent and needs a serious assessment. Also, a sufficient amount of haemolymph can be easily collected from the grub of O. rhinoceros, the time taken for auto-oxidation and melanization of collected haemolymph is long enough to carry out the PO assay in optimized sample setup arrangements. Thus, the objective of the study is to identify the desired substrate through a suitable protocol to evaluate circulatory phenoloxidase activity of O. rhinoceros at the larval stage. Above all, deciphering the PO features in this model insect could facilitate framing gene knock-out protocol for phenoloxidase, thus eventually providing a heads-up in the control or management of O. rhinoceros.

Materials and methods

Experimental animal, haemolymph collection and serum preparation

Third instar grubs of O. rhinoceros (about 5 cm in length) were collected from the local farms of Tiruvallur district, Tamil Nadu, India, from the cow dung pits and dead standing coconut palms and reared in plastic troughs in the laboratory by providing cow dung as a source of feed. The grubs were cleaned using distilled water and rinsed in 0.9% saline to remove the strung-out cow dung. Haemolymph was collected devoid of phenylthiourea (PTU) (used to inhibit melanization) by gently cutting one of the pro-legs using sterile scissors in 1.5 ml micro-centrifuge tube held on ice. Then, the collected haemolymph was vortexed for 1 min and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. The serum was collected and used for the assays. The concentration of protein present in the serum was determined by following the method of Lowry (Reference Lowry1951) and absorbance was measured at 600 nm. A standard graph was plotted using BSA to detect the concentration of unknown samples.

Preparation of substrate solutions

PO substrates such as tyrosine (L-3 [4-hydroxyphenyl] alanine) (99%), tyramine (99%), L-dopa (DL-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine) (99.0%), DL-dopa (DL-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine) (99%), dopamine (98%), catechol (99%), pyrogallol (99%) were purchased from HiMedia, Mumbai, India and protocatechuic acid (97%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany. The 10 mM concentration of each substrate were prepared by dissolving required quantities of respective substrates in 5 ml of tris-buffered saline (TBS) (50 mM tris, 90 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) (Radha et al., Reference Radha, Mullainadhan and Arumugam2013).

Examining the time duration of melanization and selection of appropriate test sample for PO spectroscopic studies

To check spontaneous melanization and velocity of melanization upon different time intervals and to select appropriate reaction sample for studying PO assay, crude haemolymph, diluted haemolymph (1:5 dilution in TBS), crude serum, diluted serum A (1:1 dilution in TBS) and diluted serum B (1:1 dilution in TBS containing CaCl2) were subjected to visual observation by maintaining the above samples at 24°C and periodically recording the intensity of melanization reaction.

Standardization of appropriate blank for PO spectroscopic studies

Initially, TBS buffer devoid of any substrates was taken as a blank for characterizing the suitable substrate of serum PO. Note: Buffer containing substrate solution cannot be used as the blank, unless a suitable substrate of serum PO is standardized. This is because PO substrates tend to auto-oxidize upon time and provide false positive optical density values every time when the readings are taken.

Standardization of desirable phenolic substrate of serum PO

Evaluation of absorption maxima of each substrate

The optimum wavelength at which maximum PO activity eventuated for each substrate was ascertained by incubating crude serum (100 μl) with an equal volume of each substrate solution (100 μl) for 15 min. Then, the reaction mixture was diluted to 300 μl using TBS and the absorption maxima (λ max) of the reaction mixture of each substrate were scanned between the wavelength ranging 380 and 800 nm.

Concurrently, auto-oxidation of each substrate during the reaction period was also checked by incubating each substrate with the TBS buffer (1:1 ratio) for the same 15 min and further diluted to 300 μl using TBS buffer and finally OD of the standing substrate was measured at the respective λ max. This was carried out for all the eight substrates, viz., monophenols (tyrosine, tyramine), diphenols (dopamine, L-dopa, DL-dopa, catechol and protocatechuic acid) and polyphenols (pyrogallol), each at 10 mM concentration.

Evaluating time course of oxidation of each PO substrate by serum PO

Serum was freshly prepared from the haemolymph of the third instar grub of O. rhinoceros and without any delay it was diluted to 1:1 ratio with freshly prepared substrate solution (each 10 mM concentration). The reaction mixture was gently mixed and incubated for various time intervals of 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min. After respective time of incubation, the reaction mixture was evenly mixed and diluted to 300 μl using TBS buffer and the optical density was measured at the substrate specific λ max. This provided the absorbance value for oxidation of substrate by serum PO.

As mentioned previously, auto-oxidation of the substrate during the same time periods was examined by diluting the substrate solution with TBS buffer in 1:1 ratio (200 μl). The reaction mixture was then incubated for various time intervals of 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min. After each time of incubation, the reaction mixture was further gently mixed and diluted to 300 μl using TBS buffer and the optical density was measured at the respective λ max. This provided the absorbance value for auto-oxidation of substrate during the incubation time.

Finally, the oxidation of substrate by serum PO alone can be calculated using the formula,

$$\eqalign{{\rm Oxidation\ of\ substrate\ by\ serum\ PO} = {\rm (OD\ value\ of\ substrate} \cr\quad + \,{\rm serum}) - ({\rm OD\ value\ of\ substrate} + {\rm TBS\ buffer)}}$$

Then, the velocity of the reaction at every incubated time can be calculated using the following formula:

$${\rm REACTION\ VELOCITY} = \displaystyle{{{\rm OD\ at\ absorption\ maxima}} \over {{\rm Incubation\ time\ at\ minutes}}}$$

This was conducted for all the eight substrates tested, namely, monophenols (tyrosine, tyramine), diphenols (dopamine, L-dopa, DL-dopa, catechol and protocatechuic acid) and polyphenols (pyrogallol).

Oxidation of different DL-dopa concentrations by serum

To know the optimal concentration of DL-dopa required for its maximum oxidation by serum, 100 μl of serum was mixed with 100 μl of DL-dopa substrate solution (1:1 concentration) at different concentrations (5.0, 7.5, 10, 12.5 and 15 mM) and incubated for 5 min at 25°C. The auto-oxidation of the substrate during the same time period was examined by diluting the substrate solution with TBS buffer in an 1:1 ratio. Finally, both the test samples were diluted to 300 μl using tris-HCl buffer and the colour developed was measured spectrophotometrically at 403 nm against a reagent blank, tris-buffered saline (50 mM, pH 7.5). Then, the oxidation of the substrate by the serum and the velocity of the reaction mixture were calculated using the above-mentioned formula.

Oxidation of DL-dopa by serum at different pH

The ability of the serum to oxidize DL-dopa at different potential of hydrogen ion concentration (pH) was examined by incubating 100 μl serum with 100 μl (10 mM) of DL-dopa substrate solutions (1:1 ratio) taken from 5 ml stock prepared at different pH (6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0 and 9.0) for 5 min at 25°C. The quantum of coloured product formed upon incubation was measured spectrophotometrically at 403 nm by diluting the sample to 300 μl against reagent blank TBS that was made at its respective pH for each assay. Further, the reaction velocity of each reaction mixture at different pH was calculated using the above-mentioned formula.

Oxidation of DL-dopa by serum at different temperatures

Serum samples (each 500 μl) were held at temperatures ranging from 10 to 60°C (10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60°C) for 30 min. After incubation, each sample was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 1 min and the serum was collected. 100 μl of serum was pipetted out and mixed with 100 μl of 10 mM DL-dopa substrate solution prepared at pH 7.5 in 1:1 ratio and incubated for 5 min at 25°C. Then, the reaction mixture was diluted to 300 μl and the colour developed was measured spectrophotometrically at 403 nm against a reagent blank.

Results

Estimation of protein concentration:

The protein concentration of serum devoid of PTU in the grub of O. rhinoceros was estimated to be 10.12 mg ml−1.

Examination of the time duration of melanization and selection of appropriate test sample for PO spectroscopic studies:

Melanization reaction showed shades of brown colour when stored at 25°C (table 1). The occurrence of melanization was indicated by increase in colour intensity in all the four test samples upon visual observation. The OD value measured spectrophotometrically at 492 nm for each test sample found to increase upon time, further confirming the above results (Table S1). The intensity of colour formed due to melanization was much higher in haemolymph (fig. 1), diluted haemolymph (fig. 2) compared to other three samples. In the case of diluted serums A and B (fig. 3), the visually observed colour intensity was same. All these observations indicated that preferably crude serum could be used for evaluating PO activity.

Table 1. Intensity of melanization reaction in various haemolymph preparations of grub of O. rhinoceros.

The number of ‘+’ sign in the table indicates increase in spontaneous melanization reaction (formation of black colour) in the different preparation of hemolymph for the observed period of 4 h.

‘-’ means no melanization (colourless).

Figure 1. Spontaneous melanization reaction of grub haemolymph of O. rhinoceros on various time intervals.

Figure 2. Spontaneous melanization reaction of 1:5 diluted grub haemolymph of O. rhinoceros on various time intervals.

Figure 3. Spontaneous melanization reaction of serum, diluted serum A and B on different time intervals from the grub of O. rhinoceros. A-Crude serum, B-Diluted serum A (1:1 dilution with tris-buffered saline), C-Diluted serum B (1:1 dilution with tris-buffered saline containing calcium chloride).

Standardization of desirable phenolic substrate for serum PO activity

Evaluation of absorption maxima (λ max) for each substrate

The serum separated from the haemolymph of O. rhinoceros was found to oxidize different substrates at varying degrees. The λmax for coloured product formed upon oxidation of each phenolic substrate by serum (fig. 4) was examined. The optimal wavelength for the substrates, which include monophenols (tyrosine and tyramine), diphenols (dopamine, L-dopa, DL-dopa, catechol, and protocatechuic acid), and polyphenols (pyrogallol), was, therefore, determined as 407, 410, 429, 465, 403, 466, 428 and 400 nm, respectively (Radha et al., Reference Radha, Mullainadhan and Arumugam2013). Further, the auto-oxidation of the substrates during the same period of incubation was also measured and reported for all the eight substrates at their respective λ max.

Figure 4. Absorption maxima for each phenolic substrate tested on serum PO activity in the grub of O. rhinoceros between λ 380 and 800 nm. Values represent mean ± SD of three determinations.

Evaluation of time course of oxidation of each substrate by serum PO and selection of desirable phenolic substrate of serum PO

In all the substrates tested, the reaction velocity was maximum when the reaction mixture was subjected to 5 min of incubation, following which the velocity of serum PO activity decreased with sharp drop after 10 min of incubation. This showed that the influence of incubation time on reaction velocity to a great extent and thus, an incubation time of 5 min was considered as optimum to obtain maximum reactivity by the PO present in the serum. Based on these findings, the relative activity of serum PO with the phenolic substrates at 5 min of incubation were in the order of pyrogallol > DL-dopa > tyramine > L-dopa > dopamine > tyrosine > protocatechuic acid > catechol (fig. 5). Among the substrates tested, the serum PO exhibited a high level of oxidation with a polyphenolic substrate, pyrogallol and the low level of activity with catechol, a diphenolic substrate. The reaction velocity with DL-dopa was nearly identical to pyrogallol when given the same 5 min of incubation. For pyrogallol, we found a substantial levels of auto-oxidation at 5 min of incubation, with significant increase throughout the incubation period. Also, the OD measured for oxidation of the substrate by serum PO was found to decrease gradually unlike other substrates (fig. 6). This was again due to abrupt auto-oxidation of the substrate that interfered in the measurement of original oxidation of the substrate by the serum PO. For these reasons, pyrogallol was not an option, so DL-dopa (fig. 7) was chosen as the appropriate phenolic substrate of serum PO in the grub of O. rhinoceros to carry out further assays of PO activity.

Figure 5. Effect of different phenolic substrates on the reaction velocity of serum PO activity in the grub of O. rhinoceros. Values represent mean ± SD of three determinations.

Figure 6. Time course of action of substrate pyrogallol on serum phenolic activity in the grub of O. rhinoceros. Values represent mean ± SD of three determinations.

Figure 7. Time course of action of substrate DL-dopa on serum phenolic activity activity in the grub of O. rhinoceros. Values represent mean ± SD of 3 determinations.

Effect of substrate concentration on serum PO activity

To determine the optimal concentration, the serum PO activity was assayed with different concentrations of DL-dopa (5, 7.5, 10, 12.5 and 15 mM), the level of oxidation gradually increased with increase in substrate concentration and reached the highest activity at the concentration of 10 mM of DL-dopa (fig. 8). Thereafter, the reaction velocity dropped with 12.5 and 15 mM concentration of the substrate and hence a range in 5–10 mM DL-dopa was considered to be optimum to perform subsequent PO enzymatic characterization assays in the grub serum of O. rhinoceros.

Figure 8. Effect of various concentrations of DL-dopa on oxidation of PO activity in the grub serum of O. rhinoceros. Values represent mean ± SD of three determinations.

Effect of pH on serum PO activity

To determine the optimal pH, the ability of the serum to oxidize DL-dopa at different potential of hydrogen ion concentration (pH) was examined by using its desirable 10 mM DL-dopa substrate solutions prepared at various pH (6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0 and 9.0). Under these conditions, PO exhibited maximum activity at pH 7.5 and decreased at pH 8 and pH 9 (fig. 9).

Figure 9. Effect of various pH of DL-dopa on oxidation of PO activity in the grub serum of O. rhinoceros. Values represent mean ± SD of three determinations.

Effect of temperature on serum PO activity

To determine the optimum temperature, PO activity was examined at different temperatures starting from 10 to 60°C, using 10 mM DL-dopa as the substrate. Under these conditions, PO exhibited maximum activity at the temperature of 20°C. When the serum samples were subjected to 50 and 60°C, a complete precipitation of the serum was observed and thereby indicating denaturation of the proteins. This inferred that PO from the grub serum of O. rhinoceros denatured at temperature above 40°C (table 2).

Table 2. Effect of various temperatures on oxidation of the substrate DL-dopa by the serum of O. rhinoceros.

Values are shown as mean ± SD of three determinations.

‘-’ indicates termination of PO activity.

Discussion

In insects, the enzyme phenoloxidase (PO) is extensively reported to play significant role in cuticular sclerotization and defensive functions (Brunet, Reference Brunet1980; Jeyaraj et al., Reference Jeyaraj, Thangaraj, Vasuki and Aruchami1986; Andersen, Reference Andersen2010). It often remains in a zymogen form called prophenoloxidase (proPO) and is readily activated by a series of serine protease enzymes to PO by both endogenous and exogenous activating systems (Sugumaran et al., Reference Sugumaran, Nellaiappan, Amaratunga, Cardinale and Scott2000). Even a very minute amount of fungal or bacterial cell wall components are enough to trigger activation of proPO cascade (Ashida and Yamazaki, Reference Ashida, Yamazaki, Ohnishi and Ishizaki1990) and both these microbes are omnipresent, thereby supporting the fact of spontaneous melanization of the haemolymph within a few minutes of collection. PO cascade are involved in initial rapid detection of foreignness and gets activated immediately thereby take part in early defence against non-self in the insect system when compared to other immunoproteins that are synthesized only after injury or invasion of foreign bodies (Ratcliffe et al., Reference Ratcliffe, Rowley, Fitzgerald and Rhodes1985). The autoimmune reactions against damaged or aberrant tissues are also reported to trigger proPO cascade in Drosophila (Ashida and Yamazaki, Reference Ashida, Yamazaki, Ohnishi and Ishizaki1990). Besides, phenoloxidase activation appears under the constitutive immune response of the innate immune system of insects (Schmid-Hempel, Reference Schmid-Hempel2005). These types of immune responses are always present at maximum, non-specific in nature and get rapidly activated to eliminate the invading pathogens that are microbial in nature (Laughton and Siva-Jothy, Reference Laughton and Siva-Jothy2011). In addition, it has been reported that spontaneous activation of proPO occurs even at the time of haemolymph collection (Bidla et al., Reference Bidla, Hauling, Dushay and Theopold2009).

All of these data demonstrate that spontaneous haemolymph melanization is inevitable and is caused by the natural conversion of proPO to PO, which is involved in the oxidation of several naturally occurring phenolic substrates in serum and haemolymph. Since PTU, an inhibitor of the enzyme PO and anticoagulants are not used in the haemolymph that is taken for PO investigation, it becomes the main obstacle in understanding PO functions (Ryazanova et al., Reference Ryazanova, Alekseev and Slepneva2012). It was also revealed that the rate of melanization varied from insect to insect. Thus, in the present study, spontaneous melanization and the rate of melanization at various time intervals were examined and the optimal reaction sample was chosen for the PO assay investigation, as previously stated. The intensity of colour formed due to melanization was much higher in haemolymph when compared to other four samples. This demonstrated that even while the molecules from haemocytes are present in both the haemolymph and the serum, proPO activating factors are somehow present in the haemolymph but not much in the serum. This is also for the reason that the amount of coagulant formed in the haemolymph varies depending on the grub from which it was collected. Additionally, the colour intensity formed in diluted serum A and B was the same, indicating that calcium's presence or absence has no bearing on the melanization process in the samples of diluted serum. Based on these observations, crude serum was chosen to measure PO activity because melanization happens at a moderate rate, which is ideal for PO assays.

Furthermore, as PO is an enzyme, standardising its preferred phenolic substrate is a necessary step and has a significant impact on the thorough investigation of serum PO in any insect system. Nevertheless, the majority of PO substrates have a propensity to spontaneously oxidize and produce falsely positive optical density measurements, which must be taken into consideration. The gap in the most of earlier investigations is that researchers frequently choose one phenolic substrate and one activator to activate PO enzyme before moving forward with PO spectroscopic experiments for characterising and purifying this enzyme (Chase et al., Reference Chase, Raina, Bruno and Sugumaran2000; Rafiei et al., Reference Rafiei, Ghadamyari, Imani, Hosseininaveh and Ahadiyat2018; Baruah et al., Reference Baruah, Sarma, Bardoloi and Bora2019; Yousefi-Lardeh and Zibaee, Reference Yousefi-Lardeh and Zibaee2020). Despite the fact that this is possible, standardising preferred phenolic substrates for the isolating PO enzyme is an advantage and improves the work's suitability, certainty and species specificity. Therefore, a thorough screening of substrate suited for serum PO is crucial to comprehend the immunological response of insects.

A total of eight substrates classified under monophenols (tyrosine and tyramine), diphenols (dopamine, L-dopa, DL-dopa, catechol and protocatechuic acid) and polyphenol (pyrogallol) were chosen and the absorption maxima respective to each substrate was methodized (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Lee, Choi, Cho, Kwon, Kawabata and Lee2000; Asano and Ashida, Reference Asano and Ashida2001; Benesova et al., Reference Benesova, Dobes and Hyrsl2009; Valadez-Lira et al., Reference Valadez-Lira, Alcocer-Gonzalez, Damas, Nunez-Mejia, Oppert, Rodriguez-Padilla and Tamez-Guerra2012; Sharifi et al., Reference Sharifi, Ghadamyari, Sajedi and Mahmoodi2015; Arumugam et al., Reference Arumugam, Sreeramulu, Paulchamy, Thangavel and Sundaram2017; Baruah et al., Reference Baruah, Sarma, Bardoloi and Bora2019). It is due to the kind of phenoloxidase present in the serum of a particular insect (monophenol oxidase, diphenol oxidase, or polyphenol oxidase) tends to affect the absorption maxima specific to each substrate. This is demonstrated in various research works where oxidation of the same substrate, such as L-dopa was measured at several absorption maxima (Da Silva et al., Reference Da Silva, Dunphy and Rau2000; Gholami et al., Reference Gholami, Ghadamyari, Oliaee and Ajamhasani2013; Clark, Reference Clark2015). Additionally, measurements at a wavelength where each substrate absorbs the most ensure that the analysis is sensitive to the range of substrate concentrations that are provided.

The affinity of the serum PO enzyme among the different phenolic substrates tested at its respective absorption maxima was found to be highest for the diphenolic substrate, DL-dopa. Several research studies were also used DL-dopa as most predominant phenolic substrate to study haemolymph PO activity (Hung and Boucias, Reference Hung and Boucias1996; Beck et al., Reference Beck, Theopold and Schmidt2000; González-Santoyo and Córdoba-Aguilar, Reference González-Santoyo and Córdoba-Aguilar2012; Valadez-Lira et al., Reference Valadez-Lira, Alcocer-Gonzalez, Damas, Nunez-Mejia, Oppert, Rodriguez-Padilla and Tamez-Guerra2012). Further, optimum concentration of DL-dopa, to be used for PO spectroscopic assay was also devised by subjecting the PO assays with various concentrations of the substrates. It was found that 10 mM DL-dopa as optimum and desirable concentration to carry out PO assays. Moreover, 10 mM concentration of DL-dopa is used for carrying out PO assays in the haemolymph of several insects like Heliothis virescens, Plodia interpunctella, Spodoptera exigua and Trichoplusia ni (Shelby and Popham, Reference Shelby and Popham2008; Valadez-Lira et al., Reference Valadez-Lira, Alcocer-Gonzalez, Damas, Nunez-Mejia, Oppert, Rodriguez-Padilla and Tamez-Guerra2012).

Studies on time course of oxidation of phenolic substrates by serum PO confirmed that prolonged incubation time with the substrate can eventually reduce the concentration of serum PO available for the assay. This is evident by the reduction of rate of the reaction velocity with the substrate upon increasing time of incubation. On the contrary, the reaction velocity is maximum for minimal incubation period of 5 min and the same incubation period is used to study PO activity in several of the previous works (Ajamhassani et al., Reference Ajamhassani, Sendi, Farsi and Zibaee2012; Zdybicka-Barabas et al., Reference Zdybicka-Barabas, Mak, Jakubowicz and Cytryńska2014). These findings substantiated that 5 min to 10 min is the optimum period of incubation for carrying PO assays in O. rhinoceros. Further, the proenzyme nature of PO in the insect system could be attributed to prevent the self-deleterious effects of PO (Nappi et al., Reference Nappi, Frey and Carton2005) and the cytotoxic intermediates that are formed during activation of PO cascade, as these could react with reactive oxygen species which are formed as natural by-products of normal body metabolism (Saul and Sugumaran, Reference Saul and Sugumaran1987). In addition, activation of PO cascade is a tightly controlled process and PO activating enzymes present in the haemolymph neutralize the excess activated PO over a period of time to combat the pleiotropic effects of PO (Cerenius et al., Reference Cerenius, Lee and Soderhall2008). This is also one of the major reasons to circumvent longer incubation period of serum PO with the substrate (Schmid et al., Reference Schmid, Brockmann, Pirk, Stanley and Tautz2008) as PO activating enzymes might interfere in the original activity. Also, less incubation period of 5 min for studying haemolymph PO activity in insects was previously reported in several studies (Halwani et al., Reference Halwani, Niven and Dunphy2000; Asano and Ashida, Reference Asano and Ashida2001; Kim et al., Reference Kim, Baek, Lee, Park, Lee, Söderhäll and Lee2002; Bae and Kim, Reference Bae and Kim2004; Kamalanathan et al., Reference Kamalanathan, Rajeswari and Sundaram2020).

Temperature and pH are the two important parameters that affect the activity of an enzyme reaction. Under various physiological circumstances, sudden changes in these variables could have considerable impact on PO activity leading to alter immune responses. The serum PO activity of O. rhinoceros remains stable up to a temperature of 40°C (Sadawarte et al., Reference Sadawarte, Moharil and Satpute2019) and shows optimum activity at a lesser temperature of 20°C. This low temperature preference is due to the fact of habitat preference of the larva which usually digs itself into the moist cow dung manure where the temperature in general prevails around 20 to 30°C. Further, complete precipitation of haemolymph was observed on incubation at 50 and 60°C indicating abrupt inactivation of PO at these elevated temperatures due to protein denaturation (Ashida, Reference Ashida1971; Tsukamoto et al., Reference Tsukamoto, Ishiguro and Funatsu1986; Ajamhassani et al., Reference Ajamhassani, Sendi, Farsi and Zibaee2012). The obtained results were in concordance with optimal temperature of PO activity reported in Apis mellifera (Zufelato et al., Reference Zufelato, Lourenço, Simões, Jorge and Bitondi2004) and Helicoverpa armigera (Sadawarte et al., Reference Sadawarte, Moharil and Satpute2019) and were lower to optimal temperature of PO activity reported in E. integriceps (35°C) (Zibaee et al., Reference Zibaee, Bandani and Malagoli2011) and Antheraea assamensis (37°C) (Baruah et al., Reference Baruah, Sarma, Bardoloi and Bora2019). The optimum pH for serum PO activity was found to be a nearly neutral i.e., 7.0–7.5 and the results were in concordance with the optimal pH reported in Bombyx mori (Ashida, Reference Ashida1971), Ostrinia furnacalis (Feng et al., Reference Feng, Song, Lü and Lu2008), Apis mellifera (Zufelato et al., Reference Zufelato, Lourenço, Simões, Jorge and Bitondi2004), Pieries rapae (Xue et al., Reference Xue, Luo, Chen, Wang and Ke2006) and Antheraea assamensis (Baruah et al., Reference Baruah, Sarma, Bardoloi and Bora2019).

On the whole, this study has made a serious attempt to define a suitable protocol to standardize a specific substrate for studying circulatory phenoloxidase present in any insect system. It is by considering various parameters from validating spontaneous melanization of the collected haemolymph to the time of incubation for the oxidation of the substrate by the enzyme as these are necessary prerequisites which are not at all disregarded.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485323000305.

Acknowledgements

The first author gratefully acknowledges DST-INSPIRE fellowship (IF200143) for financial support and DST-FIST, Department of Zoology for infrastructure facility.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

Ajamhassani, M, Sendi, JJ, Farsi, MJ and Zibaee, A (2012) Purification and characterization of phenoloxidase from the hemolymph of Hyphantria cunea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Invertebrate Survival Journal 9, 6471.Google Scholar
Andersen, SO (2010) Insect cuticular sclerotization: a review. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 40, 166178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arumugam, G, Sreeramulu, B, Paulchamy, R, Thangavel, S and Sundaram, J (2017) Purification and functional characterization of lectin with phenoloxidase activity from the hemolymph of cockroach, Periplaneta americana. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 95, 2139021393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asano, T and Ashida, M (2001) Cuticular pro-phenoloxidase of the silkworm, Bombyx mori: purification and demonstration of its transport from hemolymph. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276, 1110011112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashida, M (1971) Purification and characterization of pre-phenoloxidase from hemolymph of the silkworm Bombyx mori. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 144, 749762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashida, M and Brey, PT (1995) Role of the integument in insect defense: pro-phenol oxidase cascade in the cuticular matrix. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA 92, 1069810702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashida, M and Brey, PT (1998) Recent advances on the research of the insect prophenoloxidase cascade. In Molecular Mechanisms of Immune Responses in Insects, pp. 135172.Google Scholar
Ashida, M and Yamazaki, H (1990) Biochemistry of the phenoloxidase system in insects: with special reference to its activation, in molting and metamorphosis Ohnishi, E and Ishizaki, H (eds), Molting and Metamorphosis pp. 239265.Google Scholar
Bae, S and Kim, Y (2004) Host physiological changes due to parasitism of a braconid wasp, Cotesia plutellae, on diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 138, 3944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baruah, GS, Sarma, HK, Bardoloi, S and Bora, D (2019) Purification and characterization of phenoloxidase from the hemolymph of healthy and diseased Antheraea assamensis Helfer (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae): effects of certain biological components and chemical agents on enzyme activity. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 100, 2153121534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, M, Theopold, U and Schmidt, O (2000) Evidence for serine protease inhibitor activity in the ovarian calyx fluid of the endoparasitoid Venturia canescens. Journal of Insect Physiology 46, 12751283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benesova, J, Dobes, P and Hyrsl, P (2009) Developmental changes in phenol-oxidizing activity in the greater wax moth Galleria mellonella. Bulletin of Insectology 62, 237243.Google Scholar
Bhuvaragavan, S, Sruthi, K, Nivetha, R, Ramaraj, P, Hilda, K, Meenakumari, M and Janarthanan, S (2023) Insect galectin stimulates the human CD4+ T cell proliferation by regulating inflammation (T cell and monocyte) through Th2 immune response. Process Biochemistry 125, 1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidla, G, Hauling, T, Dushay, MS and Theopold, U (2009) Activation of insect phenoloxidase after injury: endogenous versus foreign elicitors. Journal of Innate Immunity 1, 301308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunet, PCJ (1980) The metabolism of the aromatic amino acids concerned in the cross-linking of insect cuticle. Insect Biochemistry 10, 467500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerenius, L, Lee, BL and Soderhall, K (2008) The proPO system: pros and cons for its role in invertebrate immunity. Trends in Immunology 29, 263271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase, MR, Raina, K, Bruno, J and Sugumaran, M (2000) Purification, characterization and molecular cloning of prophenoloxidases from Sarcophaga bullata. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 30, 953967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, KD (2015) Altered tyrosine metabolism and melanization complex formation underlie the developmental regulation of melanization in Manduca sexta. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 58, 6675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Da Silva, C, Dunphy, GB and Rau, ME (2000) Interaction of hemocytes and prophenoloxidase system of fifth instar nymphs of Acheta domesticus with bacteria. Developmental & Comparative Immunology 24, 367379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feng, C, Song, Q, , W and Lu, J (2008) Purification and characterization of hemolymph prophenoloxidase from Ostrinia furnacalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 151, 139146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganesh, A, Bhuvaragavan, S, Ramaraj, P and Janarthanan, S (2021) Grubs of rhinoceros beetle Oryctes rhinoceros with enormous potential for bioconversion of organic solid waste into value-added compost. Journal of Entomological Research 45, 179185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gholami, T, Ghadamyari, M, Oliaee, AO and Ajamhasani, M (2013) Effects of inhibitors on haemolymph phenoloxidase from rosaceous branch borer, Ospheranteria coerulescens (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Plant Protection Research 53, 324332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Santoyo, I and Córdoba-Aguilar, A (2012) Phenoloxidase: a key component of the insect immune system. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 142, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goonewardena, HF (1958) The rhinoceros beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros Linn.) in Ceylon Introduction, distribution and life history. Tropical Agricultuist Ceylon 114, 3960.Google Scholar
Gressitt, JL (1953) The coconut rhinoceros beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros) with particular reference to the Palau Islands. The Coconut Rhinoceros Beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros) with particular Reference to the Palau Islands. Bulletins of Bishop Museum 212, 1157.Google Scholar
Halwani, AE, Niven, DF and Dunphy, GB (2000) Apolipophorin-III and the interactions of lipoteichoic acids with the immediate immune responses of Galleria mellonella. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 76, 233241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huger, AM (1966) A virus disease of the Indian rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros (Linnaeus), caused by a new type of insect virus, Rhabdion virus Oryctes gen. n., sp. n. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 8, 3851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huger, AM (2005) The Oryctes virus: its detection, identification, and implementation in biological control of the coconut palm rhinoceros beetle, Oryctes rhinoceros (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 89, 7884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, SY and Boucias, DG (1996) Phenoloxidase activity in hemolymph of naive and Beauveria bassiana-infected Spodoptera exigua larvae. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 67, 3540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeyaraj, R, Thangaraj, T, Vasuki, CA and Aruchami, M (1986) Characteristics of phenoloxidases in larval cuticle of the coconut pest, Oryctes rhinoceros. Proceedings: Animal Sciences 95, 739744.Google Scholar
Kamalanathan, T, Rajeswari, IT and Sundaram, J (2020) Detection and characterization of phenoloxidase from the larval haemolymph of blow fly, Hemipyrellia tagaliana in response to non-self-molecules. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology 41, 128142.Google Scholar
Kim, MS, Baek, MJ, Lee, MH, Park, JW, Lee, SY, Söderhäll, K and Lee, BL (2002) A new easter-type serine protease cleaves a masquerade-like protein during prophenoloxidase activation in Holotrichia diomphalia larvae. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277, 3999940004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laughton, AM and Siva-Jothy, MT (2011) A standardised protocol for measuring phenoloxidase and prophenoloxidase in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Apidologie 42, 140149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, KM, Lee, KY, Choi, HW, Cho, MY, Kwon, TH, Kawabata, SI and Lee, BL (2000) Activated phenoloxidase from Tenebrio molitor larvae enhances the synthesis of melanin by using a vitellogenin-like protein in the presence of dopamine. European Journal of Biochemistry 267, 36953703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, W, Xue, C, Zhang, J, Yu, J and Luo, W (2010) Inhibitory effect of tannic acid on growth, development and phenoloxidase activity of Spodoptera exigua larva. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment 19, 3237.Google Scholar
Longankumar, K, Thangaraj, T, Manimegalai, M, Aruchami, M and Vinayakam, A (1996) Latent larval cuticular phenoloxidase in the coconut pest, Oryctes rhinoceros. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 33, 2738.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, OH (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullen, L and Goldsworthy, G (2003) Changes in lipophorins are related to the activation of phenoloxidase in the haemolymph of Locusta migratoria in response to injection of immunogens. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 33, 661670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nappi, AJ, Frey, F and Carton, Y (2005) Drosophila serpin 27A is a likely target for immune suppression of the blood cell-mediated melanotic encapsulation response. Journal of Insect Physiology 51, 197205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radha, S, Mullainadhan, P and Arumugam, M (2013) Detection of two distinct types of hemolymphatic prophenoloxidase and their differential responses in the black tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon, upon infection by white spot syndrome virus. Aquaculture 376, 7684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafiei, B, Ghadamyari, M, Imani, S, Hosseininaveh, V and Ahadiyat, A (2018) Characterization and inhibition studies of hemolymph phenoloxidase from Dociostaurus maroccanus. Toxin Reviews 37, 4451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliffe, NA, Rowley, AF, Fitzgerald, SW and Rhodes, CP (1985) Invertebrate immunity: basic concepts and recent advances. International Review of Cytology 97, 183350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryazanova, AD, Alekseev, AA and Slepneva, IA (2012) The phenylthiourea is a competitive inhibitor of the enzymatic oxidation of DOPA by phenoloxidase. Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry 27, 7883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadawarte, AK, Moharil, MNM and Satpute, NS (2019) Phenoloxidase activity in hemolymph of naïve and HaNPV infected larvae of Helicoverpa armigera (HB), its characterization and inhibition. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 8, 17561763.Google Scholar
Saul, SJ and Sugumaran, M (1987) Protease mediated prophenoloxidase activation in the hemolymph of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 5, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid-Hempel, P (2005) Evolutionary ecology of insect immune defenses. Annual Review of Entomology 50, 529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmid, MR, Brockmann, A, Pirk, CW, Stanley, DW and Tautz, J (2008) Adult honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) abandon hemocytic, but not phenoloxidase-based immunity. Journal of Insect Physiology 54, 439444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharifi, M, Ghadamyari, M, Sajedi, RH and Mahmoodi, NO (2015) Effects of 4-hexylresorcinol on the phenoloxidase from Hyphantria cunea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae): in vivo and in vitro studies. Insect Science 22, 639650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelby, KS and Popham, HJ (2008) Cloning and characterization of the secreted hemocytic prophenoloxidases of Heliothis virescens. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 69, 127142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelomi, M, Lin, SS and Liu, LY (2019) Transcriptome and microbiome of coconut rhinoceros beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros) larvae. BMC Genomics 20, 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strand, MR (2008) The insect cellular immune response. Insect Science 15, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugumaran, M (2002) Comparative biochemistry of eumelanogenesis and the protective roles of phenoloxidase and melanin in insects. Pigment Cell Research 15, 29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugumaran, M and Nellaiappan, K (1990) On the latency and nature of phenoloxidase present in the left colleterial gland of the cockroach Periplaneta americana. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 15, 165181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugumaran, M and Nellaiappan, K (2000) Characterization of a new phenoloxidase inhibitor from the cuticle of Manduca sexta. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 268, 379383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugumaran, M, Tan, S and Sun, HL (1996) Tyrosinase-catalyzed oxidation of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycine. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 329, 175180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugumaran, M, Nellaiappan, K, Amaratunga, C, Cardinale, S and Scott, T (2000) Insect melanogenesis: III. Metabolon formation in the melanogenic pathway—regulation of phenoloxidase activity by endogenous dopachrome isomerase (decarboxylating) from Manduca sexta. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 378, 39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsukamoto, T, Ishiguro, M and Funatsu, M (1986) Isolation of latent phenoloxidase from prepupae of the housefly, Musca domestica. Insect Biochemistry 16, 573581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valadez-Lira, JA, Alcocer-Gonzalez, JM, Damas, G, Nunez-Mejia, G, Oppert, B, Rodriguez-Padilla, C and Tamez-Guerra, P (2012) Comparative evaluation of phenoloxidase activity in different larval stages of four lepidopteran pests after exposure to Bacillus thuringiensis. Journal of Insect Science 12, 80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vavricka, CJ, Christensen, BM and Li, J (2010) Melanization in living organisms: a perspective of species evolution. Protein and Cell 1, 830841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xue, CB, Luo, WC, Chen, QX, Wang, Q and Ke, LN (2006) Enzymatic properties of phenoloxidase from Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera) larvae. Insect Science 13, 251256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yousefi-Lardeh, L and Zibaee, A (2020) Biochemical characterization of a hemolymph phenoloxidase and its endogenous inhibitor in the larvae of an invasive moth, Cydalima perspectalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Journal of Asia Pacific Entomology 23, 890900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zdybicka-Barabas, A, Mak, P, Jakubowicz, T and Cytryńska, M (2014) Lysozyme and defense peptides as suppressors of phenoloxidase activity in Galleria mellonella. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 87, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zibaee, A, Bandani, AR and Malagoli, D (2011) Purification and characterization of phenoloxidase from the hemocytes of Eurygaster integriceps (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 158, 117123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zufelato, MS, Lourenço, AP, Simões, ZL, Jorge, JA and Bitondi, MM (2004) Phenoloxidase activity in Apis mellifera honey bee pupae, and ecdysteroid-dependent expression of the prophenoloxidase mRNA. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 34, 12571268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Intensity of melanization reaction in various haemolymph preparations of grub of O. rhinoceros.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Spontaneous melanization reaction of grub haemolymph of O. rhinoceros on various time intervals.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Spontaneous melanization reaction of 1:5 diluted grub haemolymph of O. rhinoceros on various time intervals.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Spontaneous melanization reaction of serum, diluted serum A and B on different time intervals from the grub of O. rhinoceros. A-Crude serum, B-Diluted serum A (1:1 dilution with tris-buffered saline), C-Diluted serum B (1:1 dilution with tris-buffered saline containing calcium chloride).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Absorption maxima for each phenolic substrate tested on serum PO activity in the grub of O. rhinoceros between λ 380 and 800 nm. Values represent mean ± SD of three determinations.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Effect of different phenolic substrates on the reaction velocity of serum PO activity in the grub of O. rhinoceros. Values represent mean ± SD of three determinations.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Time course of action of substrate pyrogallol on serum phenolic activity in the grub of O. rhinoceros. Values represent mean ± SD of three determinations.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Time course of action of substrate DL-dopa on serum phenolic activity activity in the grub of O. rhinoceros. Values represent mean ± SD of 3 determinations.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Effect of various concentrations of DL-dopa on oxidation of PO activity in the grub serum of O. rhinoceros. Values represent mean ± SD of three determinations.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Effect of various pH of DL-dopa on oxidation of PO activity in the grub serum of O. rhinoceros. Values represent mean ± SD of three determinations.

Figure 10

Table 2. Effect of various temperatures on oxidation of the substrate DL-dopa by the serum of O. rhinoceros.

Supplementary material: File

Marieshwari et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 39.4 KB