Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:38:28.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Density-dependent distribution of parasitism risk among underground hosts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

T. Okuyama Open the ORCID record for T. Okuyama [Opens in a new window]
T. Okuyama*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +886 2 3366 5282 Fax: +886 2 2732 5017 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Variation in parasitism risk among hosts can arise from between-patch and within-patch factors, but considerably less information is known about the latter. This study investigated how distributions of the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis influenced its parasitism by the pupal parasitoid Dirhinus giffardii in the laboratory. Because B. dorsalis larvae pupate underground, pupation depth was considered as an important factor that affects the risk of parasitism. When the density of B. dorsalis larvae was varied (1, 10, and 100 larvae per arena), average pupation depth increased with the density. When the depth of pupae was manipulated, the rate of parasitism differed by depths. Parasitism at 0 cm differed from the random parasitoid model expectation, but parasitism at 1 cm was not different from the model expectation. Few pupae at 2 cm were parasitized. In another experiment, when pupae were simultaneously presented at 0 cm and 1 cm depths, parasitism at 1 cm was weakened by the presence of puape at 0 cm. These results imply that the density of the host influences pupation depth as well as the distribution of parasitism and plays an important role in host-parasitoid dynamics.

Keywords

parasitism riskpupation depthpupal parasitoidshost-parasitoid dynamicsindividual variation
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 109 , Issue 4 , August 2019 , pp. 528 - 533
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chen, X., Wong, S.W.K. & Stansly, P.A. (2016) Functional response of Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) to densities of its host, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psylloidea). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 109, 432–437.Google Scholar
Chesson, P.L. & Murdoch, W.W. (1986) Aggregation of risk: relationships among host-parasitoid models. American Naturalist 127, 696–715.Google Scholar
Cronin, J.T. (2003) Patch structure oviposition behavior, and the distribution of parasitism risk. Ecological Monographs 73, 283–300.Google Scholar
Díaz-Fleischer, F., Galvez, C. & Montoya, P. (2015) Oviposition, superparasitism, and egg load in the solitary parasitoid Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): response to host availability. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 108, 235–241.Google Scholar
Eilers, E.J., Veit, D., Rillig, M.C., Hansson, B.S., Hilker, M. & Reinecke, A. (2016) Soil substrates affect responses of root-feeding larvae to their hosts at multiple levels: orientation, locomotion and feeding. Basic and Applied Ecology 17, 115–124.Google Scholar
Free, C.A., Beddington, J.R. & Lawton, J.H. (1977) On the inadequacy of simple models of mutual interference for parasitism and predation. Journal of Animal Ecology 46, 543–554.Google Scholar
Gross, K. & Ives, A.R. (1999) Inferring host-parasitoid stability from patterns of parasitism among patches. American Naturalist 154, 489–496.Google Scholar
Hassell, M.P. & May, R.M. (1973) Stability in insect-parasite models. Journal of Animal Ecology 42, 693–726.Google Scholar
Hennessey, M.K. (1994) Depth of pupation of Caribbean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in soils in the laboratory. Environmental Entomology 23, 1119–1123.Google Scholar
Hou, B., Xie, Q. & Zhang, R. (2006) Depth of pupation and survival of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) pupae at selected soil moistures. Applied Entomology and Zoology 41, 515–520.Google Scholar
Hubbard, S.F., Marris, G., Reynolds, A. & Rowe, G.W. (1987) Adaptive patterns in the avoidance of superparasitism by solitary parasitic wasps. Journal of Animal Ecology 56, 387–401.Google Scholar
Ives, A.R. (1992) Density-dependent and density-independent parasitoid aggregation in model host-parasitoid systems. American Naturalist 140, 912–937.Google Scholar
Jackson, C.G., Long, J.P. & Klungness, L.M. (1998) Depth of pupation in four species of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in sand with and without moisture. Journal of Economic Entomology 91, 138–142.Google Scholar
May, R.M. (1978) Host-parasitoid systems in patchy environments: a phenomenological model. Journal of Animal Ecology 47, 833–843.Google Scholar
Naveed, M., Suhail, A., Ahmad, N., Rauf, I. & Akbar, W. (2014) Role of Dirhinus giffardii Sliv. age on the parasitism preference to different days old pupae of Bactrocera zonata and Bactrocera cucurbitae. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development 6, 1–5.Google Scholar
Nicholson, A.J. & Bailey, V.A. (1935) The balance of animal populations. –Part I. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 105, 551–598.Google Scholar
Okuyama, T. (2016) Parasitoid aggregation and interference in host–parasitoid dynamics. Ecological Entomology 41, 473–479.Google Scholar
Outreman, Y., Ralec, A.L., Plantegenest, M., Chaubet, B. & Pierre, J. (2001) Superparasitism limitation in an aphiid parasitoid: cornicle secretion avoidance and host discrimination ability. Journal of Insect Physiology 47, 339–348.Google Scholar
Pacala, S.W. & Hassell, M.P. (1991) The persistence of host-parasitoid associations in patchy environments, II. Evaluation of field data. American Naturalist 138, 584–605.Google Scholar
Pacala, S.W., Hassell, M.P. & May, R.M. (1990) Host-parasitoid associations in patchy environments. Nature 344, 150–153.Google Scholar
Renkema, J.M., Cutler, G.C., Lynch, D.H., MacKenzie, K. & Walde, S.J. (2011) Mulch type and moisture level affect pupation depth of Rhagoletis mendax Curran (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the laboratory. Journal of Pest Science 84, 281–287.Google Scholar
Rogers, D. (1972) Random search and insect population models. Journal of Animal Ecology 41, 369–383.Google Scholar
Taylor, A.D. (1993) Heterogeneity in host-parasitoid interactions: ‘aggregation of risk’ and the ‘CV 2 > 1’ rule. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8, 400–405.+1’+rule.+Trends+in+Ecology+and+Evolution+8,+400–405.>Google Scholar
van Alphen, J.J. & Visser, M.E. (1990) Superparasitism as an adaptive strategy for insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology 35, 59–79.Google Scholar
Vinson, S.B. (1976) Host selection by insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology 21, 109–133.Google Scholar
Wang, X.G. & Messing, R.H. (2004) Fitness consequences of body-size-dependent host species selection in a generalist ectoparasitoid. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 56, 513–522.Google Scholar
Xu, H.Y., Yang, N.W., Duan, M. & Wan, F.H. (2016) Functional response, host stage preference and interference of two whitefly parasitoids. Insect Science 23, 134–144.Google Scholar
Zamani, A.A., Talebi, A.A., Fathipour, Y. & Baniameri, V. (2006) Temperature-dependent functional response of two aphid parasitoids, Aphidius colemani and Aphidius matricariae (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae), on the cotton aphid. Journal of Pest Science 79, 183–188.Google Scholar