Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:54:47.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Delayed Oviposition in the Sheep Blowfly, Lucilia sericata (MG.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. Hobart
J. Hobart
Affiliation:
Agricultural Zoology Laboratory, University College of North Wales, Bangor.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Lucilia sericata (Mg.) has been bred successfully in small cages having a volume of about 1/60 cubic metre.

Female flies that contain ripe eggs, if given only sugar and water, will withhold their eggs for periods up to 24 days. There appears to be no decrease in the numbers of eggs laid or in the percentage of young larvae hatched, providing the delay in oviposition is not longer than ten days. If the meat is withheld for longer periods then there is a reduction in the daily egg production.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , October 1956 , pp. 469 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cousin, G. (1932). Etude expérimentale de la diapause des insectes.—Bull. biol. Belg., Suppl. 15, pp. 1–341.Google Scholar
Evans, A. C. (1936). The physiology of the Sheep Blow-fly, Lucilia sericata Meig. (Diptera).—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., 85, pp. 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanders, S. E. (1942). Oösorption and ovulation in relation to oviposition in the parasitic Hymenoptera.—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer., 35, pp. 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, R. P. (1938). Sheep Blow-fly investigations. VII. Observations on the development of eggs and oviposition in the Sheep Blow-fly, Lucilia sericata Mg.—Ann. appl. Biol., 25, pp. 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackerras, M. J. (1933). Observations on the life-histories, nutritional requirements and fecundity of blowflies.—Bull. ent. Res., 24, pp. 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salt, G. (1932). The natural control of the Sheep Blowfly, Lucilia sericata, Meigen.—Bull. ent. Res., 23, pp. 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullyett, G. C. (1950). Competition for food and allied phenomena in Sheep blowfly populations.—Phil. Trans., (B) 234, pp. 77–174.Google Scholar
Wiggleswoeth, V. B. (1936). The function of the corpus allatum in the growth and reproduction of Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera).—Quart. J. micr. Sci., 79, pp. 91–121.Google Scholar