Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:25:10.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Culture Method for Culicoides nubeculosus (Meigen) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in the Laboratory, with Notes on the Biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. M. Megahed
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Giza, Egypt.

Extract

A simple method for culturing Culicoides nubeculosus (Mg.) in the laboratory is described, the medium used for rearing the larvae being a mixture of powdered mud from near a farm byre, dried autolyzed yeast and powdered charcoal, in the proportions 25:3:2. A layer of the mixture 4 mm. deep was spread over the bottom of unglazed earthenware pots, 6 in. diam. x 1 in. high, and just covered with water. After about three weeks in an insect-proof cage in the open, the pots were brought into the laboratory, the temperature of which was maintained at 20°C. except for brief periods in very hot or very cold weather. Each pot was stocked with from 70 to 220 newly hatched larvae, derived from a single batch of eggs laid on moist filter-paper discs in 3 x 1-inch glass mating tubes by adults that had been fed on human blood and provided with raisins. The surface of the medium became covered with a growth of bacteria, algae, fungi, and protozoa, which provided a source of food for the larvae. These made shallow burrows in the substratum from which they partially emerged to feed and in which they pupated. About 45 per cent, of those introduced emerged successfully as adults.

The incubation and pupal periods lasted 3–6 and about 4–7 days, respectively. The time taken for larval development varied greatly between individuals from the same batch of eggs, and also between batches started at different times of year. The complete life-cycle of examples started as larvae in January–September was thus 3–8½ weeks, the period over which emergence occurred amongst a single batch being 1–5 weeks; the corresponding figures for those started as larvae in October were 6–18 and 2 to nearly 12 weeks.

The behaviour in the various stages is briefly described.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkin, E. E. & Bacot, A. (1917). The relation between the hatching of the eggs and the development of the larvae of Stegomyia fasciata (Aëdes calopus), and the presence of bacteria and yeasts.—Parasitology, 9, pp. 482536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, H. F., Ingram, A. & Macfie, J. W. S. (1920). Observations on the Ceratopogonine midges of the Gold Coast with descriptions of new species. Part I.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 14, pp. 187210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coggeshall, L. T. (1926). Relationship of plankton to Anopheline larvae.—Amer. J. Hyg., 6, pp. 556569.Google Scholar
Downes, J. A. (1950). Habits and life-cycle of Culicoides nubeculosus Mg.—Nature. Lond., 166, pp. 510511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gad, A. M. (1951). The head-capsule and mouth-parts in the Ceratopogonidae (Diptera—Nematocera).—Bull. Soc. Fouad ler Ent., 35, pp. 1775.Google Scholar
Hill, M. A. (1947). The life-cycle and habits of Culicoides impunctatus Goetghebuer and Culicoides obsoletus Meigen, together with some observations on the life-cycle of Culicoides odibilis Austen, Culicoides pallidicornis Kieffer, Culicoides cubitalis Edwards and Culicoides chiopterus Meigen.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 41, pp. 55115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, J. W. H. (1951). The anatomy and morphology of the early stages of Culicoides nubeculosus Meigen (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae = Heleidae).—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., 102, pp. 511570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. J. (1953). Simulium damnosum and its relation to onchocerciasis in the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan.—Bull. ent. Res., 43, pp. 597644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, A. H. (1950). Studies on the eggs of certain biting midges (Culicoides Latreille) occurring in Scotland.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond., (A) 25, pp. 4352.Google Scholar
Patton, W. S. (1913). Culicoides kiefferi, n. sp.: a new Indian blood-sucking midge.—Indian J. med. Res., 1, pp. 336338.Google Scholar
Pomerantsev, B. I. (1932). Morphology and anatomy of the genitalia of Culicoides (Diptera—Nematocera). [In Russian.]Mag. Parasit., 3, pp. 183214.Google Scholar
Roberts, E. W. (1950). Artificial feeding of Culicoides nubeculosus in the laboratory.—Nature, Lond., 166, p. 700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodina, A. G. (1949). The rôle of bacteria in the nutrition of the larvae of Tendipedids. [In Russian.]Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, (N.S.) 67, pp. 11211123.Google Scholar
Rozeboom, L. E. (1935). The relation of bacteria and bacterial filtrates to the development of mosquito larvae.—Amer. J. Hyg., 21, pp. 167179.Google Scholar
Senior-White, R. (1928). Algae and the food of Anopheline larvae.—Indian J. med. Res., 15, pp. 969988.Google Scholar
Sharp, N. A. D. (1928). Filaria perstans; its development in Culicoides austeni.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 21, pp. 371396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar