Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:39:54.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative studies on the resistance of materials to species of Coptotermes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). I. The susceptibilities of various plastics to C. acinaciformis (Froggatt) from Australia and C. formosanus Shiraki from China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. A. L. Watson ,
Dai Zi-Rong  and
R. A. Barrett
J. A. L. Watson
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology, CSIRO, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia
Dai Zi-Rong
Affiliation:
Guangdong Entomological Institute, Guangzhou, China
R. A. Barrett
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology, CSIRO, Canberra, A.C. T. 2601, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The susceptibilities of 14 plastics formulations (four polyethylenes, one polypropylene, one polyester, two polyamides, one polyurethane and five poly(vinyl chlorides)) to attack by Coptotermes acinaciformis (Frogg.) and C. formosanus Shir. in the laboratory were broadly related to hardness and surface finish. Overall, C. acinaciformis inflicted more damage than C. formosanus, despite lower survival, but some formulations appeared more susceptible to C. formosanus than to C. acinaciformis.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , September 1984 , pp. 495 - 503
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, N. T. J. (1959). Statistical methods in biology.—200 pp. London, English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Beal, R. H. & Bultman, J. D. (1978). Resistance of polymeric cable coverings to subterranean termite attack after eight years of field testing in the tropics.—Int. Biodeterior. Bull. 14, 123–127.Google Scholar
Beal, R. H., Bultman, J. D. & Southwell, C. R. (1973). Resistance of polymeric cable coverings to subterranean termite attack.—Int. Biodeterior. Bull. 9, 28–34.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1963). Die Widerstandsfähigkeit von Kunststoffen gegen Termiten.—Materialprüfung 5, 218–232.Google Scholar
Becker, G. & Von Seydlitz-Kurzbach, E. (1972). Widerstandsfähigkeit von Kunststoff-Folien gegen Termiten, Schaben und Heimschen.—Mater. & Org. 7, 161–176.Google Scholar
Calaby, J. H. & Gay, F. J. (1956). The distribution and biology of the genus Coptotermes (Isoptera) in Western Australia.—Aust. J. Zool. 4, 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coaton, W. G. H. & Sheasby, J. L. (1976). National survey of the Isoptera of southern Africa. 11. The genus Coptotermes Wasmann (Rhinotermitidae: Coptotermitinae).—Cimbebasia (A) 3, 140–172.Google Scholar
Gay, F. J., Greaves, T., Holdaway, F. G. & Wetherly, A. H. (1955). Standard laboratory colonies of termites for evaluating the resistance of timber, timber preservatives, and other materials to termite attack.—Bull. Commonw. scient. ind. Res. Org. no. 277, 60 pp.Google Scholar
Gay, F. J., Greaves, T., Holdaway, F. G. & Wetherly, A. H. (1957). The development and use of field testing techniques with termites in Australia.—Bull. Commonw. scient. ind. Res. Org. no. 280, 31 pp.Google Scholar
Gay, F. J. & Wetherly, A. H. (1969). Laboratory studies of termite resistance. V. The termite resistance of plastics.—Tech. Pap. Div. Ent. CSIRO, Aust. no. 10, 49 pp.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (1961). Termites. Their recognition and control.—187 pp. London, Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Howick, C. D. & Creffield, J. W. (1983). Intraspecific variability in feeding capacity of Coptotermes acinaciformis (Froggatt) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae).—Document no. IRG/WP/1175, Internat. Res. Group Wood Preservat. 6 pp.Google Scholar
Lenz, M. (in press). Variability of vigour between colonies of Coptotermes acinaciformis (Froggatt) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) and its implications for laboratory experimentation.—Bull. ent. Res.Google Scholar
Lenz, M. & Williams, E. R. (1980). Influence of container, matrix volume and group size on survival and feeding activity in species of Coptotermes and Nasutitermes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae, Termitidae).—Mater. & Org. 15, 25–46.Google Scholar
Mathews, A. G. A. (1977). Studies on termites from the Mato Grosso State, Brazil.—267 pp. Rio de Janeiro, Academia Brasileira de Ciências.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, F. N., Gay, F. J. & Greaves, T. (1952). Australian termites. The biology, recognition, and economic importance of the common species.—124 pp. Melbourne, Commonw. Scient. Ind. Res. Org.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences.—312 pp. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Watson, J. A. L., Dai, Z. R., Xie, X. Y. & Huang, Z. Y. (1982). A laboratory experiment on the resistance of untreated plastics to termites [in Chinese].—Dianxian Dianlan 3, 21–23. (English translation (1983) Div. Ent., CSIRO, Canberra.)Google Scholar
Watson, J. A. L. & Gay, F. J. (1980). The identities of Termes australis Walker and Termes fumipennis Walker (Isoptera).—J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 19, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar