Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:45:50.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clone lineages of grape phylloxera differ in their performance on Vitis vinifera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2010

K.S. Herbert ,
P.A. Umina ,
P.J. Mitrovski ,
K.S. Powell ,
K. Viduka  and
A.A. Hoffmann
K.S. Herbert
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Stress and Adaptation Research, Department of Genetics and Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia Department of Primary Industries, Biosciences Research Division, Rutherglen Centre, Rutherglen, Victoria 3685, Australia
P.A. Umina
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Stress and Adaptation Research, Department of Genetics and Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
P.J. Mitrovski
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Stress and Adaptation Research, Department of Genetics and Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
K.S. Powell
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Industries, Biosciences Research Division, Rutherglen Centre, Rutherglen, Victoria 3685, Australia
K. Viduka
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Stress and Adaptation Research, Department of Genetics and Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
A.A. Hoffmann*
Affiliation:
Centre for Environmental Stress and Adaptation Research, Department of Genetics and Zoology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +61 3 8344 2279 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Grape phylloxera, Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch, is an important pest of grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) (Vitaceae). The distribution and frequency of phylloxera clone lineages vary within infested regions of Australia, suggesting the introduction of separate lineages of D. vitifoliae with host associations. Virulence levels of particular phylloxera clones may vary on V. vinifera, but much of this evidence is indirect. In this study, we directly tested the performance of phylloxera clones on V. vinifera using an established excised root assay and a new glasshouse vine assessment. In the root assay, grape phylloxera clones differed in egg production and egg to adult survivorship. In the vine assay, clones differed in the number of immature and adult life stages on roots. In addition vine characteristics, including mean stem weight, root weight, leaf chlorophyll and leaf area, were affected by different phylloxera clones. The two most widespread clones displayed high levels of virulence. These results point to only some phylloxera clones being highly virulent on V. vinifera, helping to explain patterns of field damage, phylloxera distributions and continued survival and production of V. vinifera vines in some infested areas.

Keywords

Daktulosphaira vitifoliaeclone lineagesmicrosatelliteVitisplant-host relationshipsparthenogenesis
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 100 , Issue 6 , December 2010 , pp. 671 - 678
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blanchfield, A.L., Robinson, S.A., Renzullo, L.J. & Powell, K.S. (2006) Phylloxera-infested grapevines have reduced chlorophyll and increased photoprotective pigment content – can leaf pigment composition aid pest detection? Functional Plant Biology 33, 507–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boubals, D. (1966) Inheritance of resistance to radicicolous phylloxera in vine. Annales de l'Amelioration des Plantes 16, 327–347.Google Scholar
Bruce, R.J., Lamb, D.W., Mackie, A.M., Korosi, G.A. & Powell, K.S. (2009) Using objective biophysical measurements as the basis of targeted surveillance for detection of grapevine phylloxera Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch: Preliminary findings. Acta Horticulturae 816, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chervin, C., Franz, P. & Birrell, F. (1996) Calibration tile slightly influences assessment of color change in pears from green to yellow using the L, a, b space. Hortscience 31, 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clydesdale, F.M. (1978) Instrumental measurement and control of colour. Reviews in Progress in Coloration 18, 47–55.Google Scholar
Corrie, A.M. (2003) Genetic structure of grape phylloxera populations in Australia PhD thesis, La Trobe University, Budoora, Australia.Google Scholar
Corrie, A.M. & Hoffmann, A.A. (2004) Fine-scale genetic structure of grape phylloxera from the roots and leaves of Vitis. Heredity 92, 118–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corrie, A.M., Crozier, R.H., Van Heeswijck, R. & Hoffmann, A.A. (2002) Clonal reproduction and population genetic structure of grape phylloxera, Daktulosphaira vitifoliae, in Australia. Heredity 88, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corrie, A.M., van Heeswijck, R. & Hoffmann, A.A. (2003) Evidence for host-associated clones of grape phylloxera Daktulosphaira vitifoliae (Hemiptera: Phylloxeridae) in Australia. Bulletin of Entomological Research 93, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Benedictis, J.A. & Granett, J. (1993) Laboratory evaluation of grape roots as hosts of California grape phylloxera biotypes. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 44, 285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Benedictis, J.A., Granett, J. & Taormino, S.P. (1996) Differences in host utilization by California strains of grape phylloxera. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 47, 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Castella, F. & Brittlebank, C.C. (1917) Report of the Government Viticulturalist. Journal of Agriculture (Victoria) 15, 685–700.Google Scholar
Granett, J., Timper, P. & Lider, L.A. (1985) Grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae) (Homoptera, Phylloxeridae) biotypes in California. Journal of Economic Entomology 78, 1463–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granett, J., Walker, M.A., Kocsis, L. & Omer, A.D. (2001) Biology and management of grape phylloxera. Annual Review of Entomology 46, 387–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hales, D.F., Tomiuk, J., Wöhrmann, K. & Sunnucks, P. (1997) Evolutionary and genetic aspects of aphid biology: a review. European Journal of Entomology 94, 1–55.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, D.J. & Via, S. (1994) Variation in performance on 2 grape cultivars within and among populations of grape phylloxera from wild and cultivated habitats. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 70, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, K., Powell, K., McKay, A., Hartley, D., Herdina, , Schiffer, M. & Hoffmann, A.A. (2008) Developing and testing a diagnostic probe for grape phylloxera applicable to soil samples. Journal of Economic Entomology 101, 1934–1943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herbert, K.S., Powell, K.S., Hoffmann, A.A., Parsons, Y., Ophel-Keller, K. & Van Heeswijck, R. (2003) Early detection of phylloxera – present and future directions. Australian and New Zealand Grapegrower and Winemaker 473a, 93–96.Google Scholar
Herbert, K.S., Hoffmann, A.A. & Powell, K.S. (2006) Changes in grape phylloxera abundance in ungrafted vineyards. Journal of Economic Entomology 99, 1774–1783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellow, A.V. (2001) A study of the interaction between susceptible and resistant grapevines and phylloxera. PhD thesis, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar
Martinez-Peniche, R. & Boubals, D. (1994) Résistance du 41-B au phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae FITCH) variabilité du comportement in vitro de différentes populations du puceron sur raciness isolées. Progré Agricole et Viticole 111, 286–294.Google Scholar
Omer, A.D., Granett, J., Kocsis, L. & Downie, D.A. (1999) Preference and performance responses of California grape phylloxera to different Vitis rootstocks. Journal of Applied Entomology-Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Entomologie 123, 341–346.Google Scholar
Powell, K.S. (2008) Grape phylloxera: An overview. pp. 96–114 in Johnson, S.N. & Murray, P.J. (Eds) Root Feeders: An Ecosystem Perspective. Wallingford, UK, CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, K.S., Slattery, W.J., Deretic, J., Herbert, K.S. & Hetherington, S. (2003) Influence of soil type and climate on the population dynamics of grapevine phylloxera in Australia. Acta Horticulturae 617, 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisenzein, H., Baumgarten, A., Pfeffer, M. & Aust, G. (2007) The influence of soil properties on the development of the grape phylloxera population in Austrian viticulture. Acta Horticulturae 733, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, G.C. & Granett, J. (1990) Grape phylloxera (Homoptera, Phylloxeridae) biotypes in France. Journal of Economic Entomology 83, 489–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, D.J., Lamb, D.L., Powell, K.S., Blanchfield, A.L. & Brereton, I.M. (2007) Detection of phylloxera infestation in grapevines by NMR methods. Acta Horticulturae 733, 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umina, P.A., Corrie, A.M., Herbert, K.S., White, V.L., Powell, K.S. & Hoffmann, A.A. (2007) The use of DNA markers for pest management – clonal lineages and population biology of grape phylloxera. Acta Horticulturae 733, 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorburger, C., Lancaster, M. & Sunnucks, P. (2003) Environmentally-related patterns of reproductive modes in the aphid Myzus persicae, and the predominance of two ‘superclones’ in Victoria, Australia. Molecular Ecology 12, 3493–3504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vorwerk, S. & Forneck, A. (2007) Genetic structure of European populations of grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae Fitch) as determined by SSR-analysis. Acta Horticulturae 733, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar