Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:01:08.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breeding the House-fly (Musca domestica, L.) in the Laboratory

I. Introduction and Technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

E. B. Basden
E. B. Basden
Affiliation:
Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Pest Infestation Laboratory, Slough
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since December, 1942, a supply of adult house-flies, averaging approximately 2,500 a day, has been required in this Laboratory for experimental work on fly sprays. The production in quantity of insects suitable for such use is by no means a straightforward matter and a considerable amount of work was undertaken before a satisfactory technique was established.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , January 1947 , pp. 381 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, T. C., Dicke, R. J. & Brooks, J. W. (1943). Rapid insecticide testing.—Soap, 19, no. 4, pp. 94–96, 121.Google Scholar
Anonymous (1941) Peet-Grady method.—Soap, Blue Book, 1941, pp. 197–201.Google Scholar
Bickoff, E. (1943). Housefly. In Campbell, F. L. & Moulton, F. R. Ed. Laboratory procedures in studies of the chemical control of insects, p. 74. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Campbell, F. L. & Sullivan, W. N. (1938). Testing fly sprays.—Soap, 14, no. 6, pp. 119–125, 149.Google Scholar
Cox, A. J. (1944). Insecticide testing.—Soap, 20, no. 6, pp. 114–117, 149.Google Scholar
David, W. A. L. & Harvey, G. L.* (1941). Flies for the Peet-Grady test.— Soap, 17, no. 10, pp. 103, 105.Google Scholar
De Bach, P. (1942). A simple method of obtaining standardized houseflies.—J. econ. Ent., 35, pp. 282–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagleson, C. (1940). Livestock sprays.—Soap, 16, no. 7, pp. 96–99, 117.Google Scholar
Eagleson, C. (1943). Housefly. In Campbell, F. L. & Moulton, F. R. Ed. Laboratory procedures in studies of the chemical control of insects, pp. 74–77. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Eagleson, C. & Benke, R. (1938). A note on rearing houseflies.—Soap, 14, no. II, pp. 109, 119.Google Scholar
Hockenyos, G. L. (1931). Rearing houseflies for testing contact insecticides.—J. econ. Ent., 24, pp. 717–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, O. C. (1918). An examination of the sense-reactions of flies.—Bull. ent. Res., 9, pp. 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. C. & Simanton, W. A. (1938). Biological factors in Peet-Grady results.—Soap, 14, no. 5, pp. 103, 105, 107, 109, 111, 113.Google Scholar
Ostrolenk, M. & Welch, H. (1942). The common housefly (Musca domestica) as a source of pollution in food establishments.—Food Res., 7, pp. 192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, H. H. (1932). An efficient medium for rearing houseflies throughout the year.—Science, 76, no. 1972, pp. 350–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, H. (1919). Notes on biology of Necrobia ruficollis, Fabr. (Coleoptera, Cleridae).—Ann. appl. Biol., 6, pp. 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simanton, W. A. & Miller, A. C. (1938). Greater speed and accuracy with modified Peet-Grady method.—Soap, 14, no. 5, pp. 115, 117.Google Scholar