Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:52:14.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The biting habits of some Jamaican Culicoides I. C. barbosai Wirth & Blanton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. S. Kettle  and
J. R. Linley
D. S. Kettle
Affiliation:
Sandfly Research Unit, Ministry of Health, Jamaica
J. R. Linley
Affiliation:
Sandfly Research Unit, Ministry of Health, Jamaica
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Field studies on the biting habits of Culicoides barbosai Wirth & Blanton were made near Montego Bay, Jamaica, during 1959 and 1960. Females of C. barbosai were collected in sufficient numbers for analysis in. seven experiments, six from Florida beach and one from Beading. Four positions were marked out on each site. Begular meteorological observations were made in the middle of the catching positions. An experiment consisted of four trials held on different days, each trial being composed of four collecting periods of 15 min. separated by 5-min. intervals. In each period four individuals collected, two exposing an arm each and two a leg. Individuals collected in a different position in each period of a trial.

Catches were logarithmically transformed for analysis and tests of significance. The experiments were designed to provide correction factors for limbs, positions on Florida beach, and collectors, for use in other experiments. Correction factors are given as logarithms for application to transformed catches.

More C. barbosai were collected from arms than legs, and catches in position IV were significantly higher than those in positions I, II and III. Five collectors (C, D, K, L and S) were compared. The ratio between leg/arm catches from D, who collected in only two experiments, was significantly different from those of C, L and S. The differences between the catches of C, K and L were insignificant, but all three caught significantly more than S. The catches from L were smaller after sea bathing and, compared to C and S, L’s catches increased significantly immediately after sunset. For this reason and to avoid inhibiting winds, quantitative studies on females of C. barbosai are best conducted in the early morning (dawn + 40 min.).

The experimental errors (residual variances) were homogeneous with probabilities of 0.1 (C. barbosai—7 experiments) and 0.4 (C. furens (Poey)—8 experiments).

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , May 1969 , pp. 729 - 753
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, A. W. A. (1951). Studies of the responses of the female Aëdes mosquito. Part IV. Field experiments on Canadian species.—Bull. ent. Res. 42 pp. 575–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. W. A. (1954). Idem. Part VI. The attractiveness of coloured cloths to Canadian species.—Bull. ent. Res. 45 pp. 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. W. A. & Carmichael, A. G. (1961). Lysine and alanine as mosquito attractants.—J. econ. Ent. 54 pp. 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, A. N. (1963). The physiology of mosquitoes.—393 pp. Oxford, Pergamon Pr.Google Scholar
Dalmat, H. T. (1955). The black flies (Diptera, Simuliidae) of Guatemala and their role as vectors of onchocerciasis.—Smithson. misc. Coll. 125 no. 1 (Publ. 4173), 425 pp.Google Scholar
Freyvogel, T. A. (1961). Ein Beitrag zu den Problemen um die Blutmahlzeit von Stechmücken.—Acta. trop. 18 pp. 201–251.Google Scholar
Haddow, A. J. (1960). Studies on the biting habits and medical importance of East African mosquitos in the genus Aëdes. I.—Subgenera Aëdimorphus, Banksinella and Dunnius.—Bull. ent. Res. 50 pp. 759–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddow, A. J. (1961). Entomological studies from a high tower in Mpanga forest, Uganda. VII. The biting behaviour of mosquitoes and tabanids. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 113 pp. 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harker, J. E. (1964). The physiology of diurnal rhythms.—114 pp. CambridgeUniv. Pr.Google ScholarPubMed
Hill, M. A. (1947). The life-cycle and habits of Culicoides impunctatus Goetghebuer and Culicoides obsoletus Meigen, together with some observations on the life-cycle of Culicoides odibilis Austen, Culicoides pallidicornis Kieffer, Culicoides cubitalis Edwards and Culicoides chiopterus Meigen.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 41 pp. 55–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, D. W. (1948). Ecological observations on the blackflies and punkies of central Alaska.—Mosquito News 8 pp. 148–154.Google Scholar
Kettle, D. S. & Linley, J. R. (1967a). The biting habits of Leptoconops bequaerti. I. Methods; standardization of technique; preferences for individuals, limbs and positions.—J. appl. Ecol. 4 pp. 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettle, D. S. & Linley, J. R. (1967b). Idem. II. Effect of meterological conditions on biting activity; 24 hour and seasonal cycles.—J. appl. Ecol. 4 pp. 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettle, D. S. & Linley, J. R. (1969). The biting habits of some Jamaican Culicoides. II. C. furens (Poey).—Bull. ent. Res. 59.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. L. (1965). Carbon dioxide as an attractant for Culicoides.—J. med. Ent. 2 pp. 56–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahm, U. (1956). Zum Problem der Attraktion von Stechmücken durch den Menschen.—Acta. trop. 13 pp. 319–344.Google Scholar
Rahm, U. (1957). Zur Bedeutung des Duftes und des Schweisses bei der Attracktion von Aedes aegypti durch den Menschen.—Acta trop. 14 pp. 208–217.Google Scholar
Rahm, U. (1958). Die attraktive Wirkung der vom Menschen abgegebenen Duftstoffe auf Aedes aegypti L.—Z. Tropenmed. Parasit. 9 pp. 146–156.Google ScholarPubMed
Roessler, H. P. (1961). Versuche zur geruchlichen Anlockung weiblicher Stechmücken (Aedes aegypti L., Culicidae).—Z. Vergl. Physiol. 44 pp. 184–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, M. R. & Brown, A. W. A. (1956). Studies on the responses of the female Aëdes mosquito. Part VII. —The effect of skin temperature, hue and moisture on the attractiveness of the human hand.—Bull. ent. Res. 47 pp. 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1961). Statistical methods.—5th edn., 534 pp. Lowa St. Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
Speert, H. (1948). Local action of sex hormones.—Physiol. Rev. 28 pp. 23–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, P. H. (1967). Sampling haematophagous Diptera with a conical trap and carbon dioxide, with special reference to Culex salinarius.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60 pp. 1260–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirth, W. W. & Blanton, F. S. (1956). A new species of salt-marsh sand fly from Florida, the Bahamas, Panama and Ecuador: its distribution and taxonomic differentiation from Culicoides furens (Poey) (Diptera, Heleidae).—Fl. Ent. 39 pp. 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar