Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:38:43.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biosystematics of the Cotesia flavipes species complex (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): morphometrics of selected allopatric populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Susan W. Kimani-Njogu ,
William A. Overholt ,
James Woolley  and
Annette Walker
Susan W. Kimani-Njogu
Affiliation:
International Centre for Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), PO Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya:
William A. Overholt*
Affiliation:
International Centre for Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), PO Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya:
James Woolley
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA:
Annette Walker
Affiliation:
International Institute of Entomology, 56 Queens Gate, London SW7 5JR, UK
*
*Author for correspondence.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Morphometric studies of allopatric populations of the Cotesia flavipes species complex representing three putative species; C. flavipes Cameron, C. sesamiae (Cameron) and C. chilonis (Matsumura), were conducted. Sixteen characters were measured. Principal component analysis separated the complex into three somewhat overlapping groups that corresponded well with previous concepts of the species. Canonical variate analysis separated the complex into three distinct clusters with populations from Africa together, populations from Asia and the Neotropics forming a second cluster, and material from China and Japan forming a third cluster. The Mahalanobis squared distances between the three clusters were nearly equal. Results support recognition of three species in the C. flavipes complex.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 87 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 61 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alam, M.M., Beg, M.N. & Ghani, M.A. (1972) Introduction of Apanteles spp. against graminaceous borers into Pakistan. Technical Bulletin, Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control 15, 1–10.Google Scholar
Breniere, J. & Bordat, D. (1982) Interet et difficulties de la lutte biologique par introduction d entomophages - cas des foreurs du riz en Afrique. Agronomie Tropicale 37, 203–206.Google Scholar
Daly, H.V. (1985) Insect morphometrics. Annual Review of Entomology 30, 415–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, T.W., Huffman, F.R. & Smith, J.W. Jr. (1979) Introduction and establishment of Apanteles flavipes (Hym: Braconidae) on Diatraea saccharalis (Lep.: Pyralidae) in Texas. Entomophaga 24, 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimani, S.W. & Overholt, W.A. (1995) Biosystematics of the Cotesia flavipes Cameron complex (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): Interspecific hybridisation, sex pheromone and mating behaviour studies. Bulletin of Entomological Research 85, 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, L.F. (1990) Traditional morphology. pp. 77–122in Rohlf, F.J. & Bookstein, F.J. (Eds) Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication Number 2,The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology,Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Mohyuddin, A.I. (1971) Comparative biology and ecology of A. flavipes (Cameron) and A. sesamiae Cameron as parasites of graminaceous borers. Bulletin of Entomological Research 61, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagaraja, H. (1971) Morphological differences between Apanteles chilonis (Munakata) and A. sesamiae Cameron (Hym. Braconidae), parasites on graminaceous moth borers. Technical Bulletin, Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control 14, 59–61.Google Scholar
Overholt, W.A., Ochieng, J.O., Lammers, P. & Ogedah, K. (1994) Rearing and field release methods for Cotesia flavipes Cameron (Hym: Braconidae), a parasitoid of tropical gramineous stemborers. Insect Science and its Application 15, 253–259.Google Scholar
Polaszek, A. & Walker, A.K. (1991) The Cotesia flavipes complex: parasitoids of cereal stem borers in the tropics. Redia 74, 335–341.Google Scholar
Rao, V.P. & Nagaraja, H. (1967) Validity of specific status of A. chilonis (Munakata). Technical Bulletin, Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control 9, 45–52.Google Scholar
Reyment, R. (1990) Reification of classical multivariate analysis in morphometry. pp. 123–146in Rohlf, F.J. & Bookstein, F.L. (Eds) Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication Number 2,The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology,Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
SAS Institute (1988) SAS/STAT users guide. Release 6.03 edn, 1028 pp. Cary North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
Sigwalt, B. & Pointel, J.G. (1980) Statut specifique et separation des Apanteles du sous-groupe flavipes (Hym Braconidae) utilisees en lutte biologique. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 16, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoroszewski, R.W. & Van Hamburg, H. (1987) The release of Apanteles flavipes (Cameron) (Hym: Braconidae) against stalk-borers of maize and grain-sorghum in South Africa. Journal of the Entomological Society of South Africa 50, 249–255.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D.S. (1932) A revision of the Ethiopian species of the genus Apanteles (Hym. Bracon). Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 80, 301–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar