Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:22:32.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Bionomics of the Neotropical Cornstalk Borer, Diatraea lineolata, Wlk. (Lep., Pyral.) in Trinidad, B.W.I.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. Keith McE Kevan
Affiliation:
Entomology Department, Imperial College of Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad.

Extract

The genus of Pyralid (Crambid) moths to which Diatraea lineolata belongs is one of considerable size, containing fifty-one described species from the New World (Box, 1931, 1935a), and together with the Old World genus Proceras which, according to Tarns (1942), should be regarded as distinct from Diatraea, includes a fairly large number of major pests of cultivated grass crops in both hemispheres, the most notorious being D. saccharalis (sugar-cane moth-borer).

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babcock, K. W. (1927). The European corn-borer, Pyrausta nubilalis Hübn. I. A discussion of its dormant period.—Ecology, 8, pp. 4559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumberger, J. P. (1914). Studies in longevity of insects.—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer., 7, pp. 323353.Google Scholar
Box, H. E. (1931). The Crambine genera Diatraea and Xanthopherne (Lep., Pyral.).—Bull. ent. Res., 22, pp. 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, H. E. (1935). New records and three new species of American Diatraea (Lep., Pyral.).—Bull. ent. Res., 26, pp. 323333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousin, G. (1929). Remarques sur la vie larvaire de Lucilia sericata Meig.—C. R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 101, pp. 653654.Google Scholar
Cousin, G. (1929 a). Influence de l'état hygrometrique du milieu sur l'evolution larvaire de Lucilia sericata Meig.—C. R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 101, pp. 913915.Google Scholar
Cousin, G. (1930). La diapause de Lucilia sericata Meig.—C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 190, pp. 651653.Google Scholar
De Charmoy, D. d'E. & Gebert, S. (1921). Insect pests of minor crops in Mauritius.—Bull. ent. Res., 12, pp. 181190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henneguy, L. F. (1904). Les Insectes. Morphologie, reproduction, embryogenie. pp. ixviii, 1804. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hynes, H. B. N. (1942). Lepidopterous pests of maize in Trinidad.—Trop. Agriculture, Trin., 19, pp. 194202.Google Scholar
Kevan, D. K. McE. (1943). The neotropical cornstalk borer, Diatraea lineolata Walk., and the sugar-cane moth-borer, D. saccharalis (Fabr.) as maize pests in Trinidad, B.W.I., with notes from Grenada.—Trop. Agriculture, Trin., 20, pp. 167174.Google Scholar
Pickles, A. (1936). Observations on the early larval mortality of certain species of Diatraea (Lepid., Pyralidae), under cane field conditions in Trinidad.—Trop. Agriculture, Trin., 13, pp. 155160.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. (1922). Etudes sur le sommeil d'hiver pré-imaginal de Muscides.—Bull. biol., 56, pp. 455544.Google Scholar
Shelpord, V. E. (1929). Laboratory and field ecology. xii & 608 pp. London.Google Scholar
Squire, F. A. (1937). A theory of diapause in Platyedra gossypiella Saund.—Trop. Agriculture, Trin., 14, pp. 299301.Google Scholar
Strel'Nikov, I. D. (1936). Wasserumsatz und Diapause bei Loxostege sticticalis L.—C. R. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., (N.S.) 1, pp. 367371.Google Scholar
Tams, W. H. T. (1942). Note on the name of the sugar cane borer of Mauritius (Lep., Pyral.).—Bull. ent. Res., 33, pp. 6768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, M. T. (1926). The breaking-up of hibernation in the codling moth larva.—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer., 19, pp. 429439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, J. (1942). Biological control of Diatraea mauriciella Wlk. in Mauritius. I. Investigations in Ceylon in 1939.—Bull. ent. Res., 33, pp. 147158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1939). The principles of insect physiology. viii & 434 pp. London.Google Scholar