Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:49:43.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antipredator behavior of the new mass-reared unisexual strain of the Mexican Fruit Fly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2015

G. I. González-López ,
D. Rao ,
F. Díaz-Fleischer ,
D. Orozco-Dávila  and
D. Pérez-Staples
G. I. González-López
Affiliation:
Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Veracruzana, Circuito Gonzalo Aguirre Beltrán S/N C. P. 91090, Xalapa, Veracruz, México Programa Moscafrut DGSV-SENASICA, Camino a los Cacahotales S/N, C. P. 30860, Metapa de Domínguez, Chiapas, México
D. Rao
Affiliation:
INBIOTECA, Universidad Veracruzana, Av. de las Culturas Veracruzanas, No.101, Col. E. Zapata, C.P. 91090, Xalapa, Veracruz, México
F. Díaz-Fleischer
Affiliation:
INBIOTECA, Universidad Veracruzana, Av. de las Culturas Veracruzanas, No.101, Col. E. Zapata, C.P. 91090, Xalapa, Veracruz, México
D. Orozco-Dávila
Affiliation:
Programa Moscafrut DGSV-SENASICA, Camino a los Cacahotales S/N, C. P. 30860, Metapa de Domínguez, Chiapas, México
D. Pérez-Staples*
Affiliation:
INBIOTECA, Universidad Veracruzana, Av. de las Culturas Veracruzanas, No.101, Col. E. Zapata, C.P. 91090, Xalapa, Veracruz, México
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +52 228 8422700 ext 10851 Fax: +52 228 8422773 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tephritid pests controlled through the sterile insect technique (SIT) are mass-reared and subsequently released in affected areas. Several quality parameters are currently used to test adults, but none take into account interactions with a predator. When sterile males are released in the field, they will need to avoid predators until they reach sexual maturity and survive long enough to mate with wild females. Spiders are one of the most common predators that flies may encounter in release sites. In this study, we evaluated the antipredator behavior of a mass-reared sterile unisexual strain (‘Tapachula-7’) of the Mexican fruit fly Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) against their spider predators. We sampled spiders in citrus trees to determine which families could be more common. We established the baseline activity rates of sterile Tapachula-7 (Tap-7) flies in comparison with wild flies. We also tested the behavior of the fertile and sterile bisexual strain and wild flies against hunting spiders (Family Salticidae) and orb building spiders (Family Tetragnathidae). We recorded 18 spider families, with Salticidae being the most dominant. Tap-7 flies diminished their activity in comparison with wild males at 1800 h but showed similar activity levels earlier in the day. When exposed to orb-web spiders (Leucauge venusta), Tap-7, fertile and sterile males from the bisexual strain had similar rates of survival, but Tap-7 males showed lower survival than wild males. Against hunting spiders (Phidippus audax), wild males had higher probability of defensive wing displays, but there was no difference in spider attack rates. In general, sterile Tap -7 males performed as well as males from the bisexual strain, although they had lower survival than wild males. This could be due to either mass-rearing and/or irradiation effects. We recommend the use of the defensive wing display behavior as a quality parameter and propose a rapid and effective method to evaluate fly activity. The efficiency of SIT will be improved if released sterile males have the same antipredator repertoire as their wild counterparts.

Keywords

predator–prey interactionsspidersSITAnastrepha ludensTapachula-7Tephritidae
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 106 , Issue 3 , June 2016 , pp. 314 - 321
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aluja, M., Piñero, J., Jácome, I., Díaz-Fleischer, F. & Sivinski, J. (2000) Behavior of flies in the genus Anastrepha (Trypteinae: Toxotrypanini). pp. 375–408in Aluja, M. & Norrbom, A.L. (Eds) Fruit Flies (Tephritidae): Phylogeny and Evolution of Behavior. Boca Raton, USA, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Dor, A., Valle-Mora, J., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, S.E. & Liedo, P. (2014) Predation of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) by Norops serranoi (Reptilia: Polychrotidae): functional response and evasion ability. Environmental Entomology 43, 706–715.Google Scholar
Barrientos, J.A., Villalba, M., Alvis-Dávila, L. & García-Marí, F. (2010) Identificación y abundancia de arañas (Araneae) en los cultivos de cítricos valencianos. Boletin de Sanidad Vegetal Plagas 36, 69–86.Google Scholar
Bateman, M. (1972) The ecology of fruit flies. Annual Review of Entomology 17, 493–518.Google Scholar
Benfatto, D., Di Franco, F. & Vacante, V. (1992) Spiders of Italian citrus groves. International Citrus Congress (7th:1992: Acireale, Italy) 3, 938–942. Acireale, Italia: International Society of Citriculture.Google Scholar
Benelli, G. (2015) Aggression in Tephritidae flies: where, when, why? Future directions for research in integrated pest management. Insects 6, 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cáceres, C., Cayol, J.P., Enkerlin, W., Franz, G., Hendrichs, J. & Robinson, A.S. (2002) Comparison of Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) (Tephritidae) bisexual and genetic sexing strains: development, evaluation and economics. pp. 367–381 in Proceedings of the 6th International Fruit Fly Symposium, 6–10 May 2002, Stellenbosch, South Africa.Google Scholar
Calkins, C.O. & Webb, J.C. (1983) A cage and support framework for behavioural test of fruit flies in the field. Florida Entomology 66, 512–514.Google Scholar
Cayol, J.P. (2000) Changes in sexual behaviour and life history traits of Tephritid species caused by mass-rearing processes. pp. 843–869in Aluja, M. & Norrbom, A.L. (Eds) Fruit Flies (Tephritidae): Phylogeny and Evolution of Behavior. Boca Raton, USA, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Domíngez, J., Artiaga, L.T., Solís, E. & Hernández, E. (2010) Métodos de Colonización y Cría Masiva. pp. 259–276in Montoya, P., Toledo, J. & Hernández, E. (Eds) Moscas de la Fruta: Fundamentos y Procedimientos para su Manejo. México, D.F., S y G Editores.Google Scholar
Dominiak, B.C., Fanson, B.G., Collins, S.R. & Taylor, P.W. (2013) Automated locomotor activity monitoring as a quality control assay for mass-reared tephritid flies. Pest Management Science 70, 304–309.Google Scholar
Eskafi, F.L. & Kolbe, M.M. (1990) Predation on larval and pupal Ceratitis capitata (Dipthera: Tephritidae) by the ant Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and other predators in Guatemala. Enviromental Entomology 19, 148–153.Google Scholar
FAO/IAEA/USDA (2003) Manual for Product Quality Control and Shipping Procedures for Sterile Mass-Reared Tephritid Fruit Flies. Version 5, Vienna, Austria, International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
FAO/IAEA/USDA (2014) Product Quality Control for Sterile Mass-reared and Released Tephritid Fruit Flies. Version 6.0. Vienna, Austria, International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Flores, S., Campos, S., Gómez, E., Espinoza, E., Wilson, W. & Montoya, P. (2015) Evaluation of field dispersal and survival capacity of the genetic sexing strain Tapachula-7 of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomologist 98, 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foelix, R.F. (1982) Biology of Spiders. Cambridge, Massachusets, EUA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gómez, S.Y. (2010) Procedimientos y equipos utilizados en la esterilización de moscas. pp. 307–318in Montoya, P., Toledo, J. & Hernández, E. (Eds) Moscas de la Fruta: Fundamentos y Procedimientos para su Manejo. México, D.F., S y G Editores.Google Scholar
Hendrichs, M.A. & Hendrichs, J. (1998) Perfumed to be killed: interception of Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) sexual signaling by predatory foraging wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 91, 228–234.Google Scholar
Hendrichs, J., Kenmore, P., Robinson, A.S., Vreysen, M.J.B. (2007 a) Area-wide integrated pest management (AW-IPM): principles, practice and prospects. pp. 3–34in Vreysen, M.J.B., Robinson, A.S. & Hendrichs, J. (Eds) Area-Wide Control of Insect Pests. Vienna, Springer.Google Scholar
Hendrichs, M.A., Wornoayporn, V., Katsoyannos, B. & Hendrichs, J. (2007 b) Quality control method to measure predator evasion in wild and mass-reared Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomologist 90, 64–70.Google Scholar
Hernández-Ortiz, V. & Aluja, M. (1993) Listado de especies del genero neo tropical Anastrepha (Díptera: Tephritidae) con notas sobre su distribución y trampas hospederas. Folia Entomológica Mexicana 88, 89–105.Google Scholar
Hernández, M.R., Orozco, D., Quintero, J.L. & Domínguez, J. (2010) Control de calidad en la cría masiva. pp. 277–289in Montoya, P., Toledo, J. & Hernández, E. (Eds) Moscas de la Fruta: Fundamentos y Procedimientos para su Manejo. México, D.F., S y G Editores.Google Scholar
Hedström, I. (1992) Why do guava fruit flies Anastrepha striata (Tephritidae) avoid the upper canopy of host trees? Tropical Pest Management 38, 136–143.Google Scholar
Jocqué, R. & Dippenaar-Schoeman, A.S. (2006) Spider Families of the World. Tervuren, Belgium: Royal Museum for Central Africa.Google Scholar
Kelber, A., Vorobyev, M. & Osorio, D. (2003) Animal colour vision – behavioural tests and physiological concepts. Biological Reviews 78, 81–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klassen, W. & Curtis, C.F. (2005) History of the Sterile Insect Technique. pp. 2–36in Dick, V.A., Hendrichs, J. & Robinson, A.S. (Eds) Sterile Insect Technique. Principles and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management. The Netherlands, Springer.Google Scholar
Knipling, L.E. (1955) Possibilities of insect control or eradication through the use of sexually sterile males. Journal of Economic Entomology 48, 459–462.Google Scholar
Lance, D.R., McInnis, D.O., Rendon, P. & Jackson, C.G. (2000) Courtship among sterile and wild Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in field cages in Hawaii and Guatemala. Annals of Entomological Society of America 93, 1179–1185.Google Scholar
Márquez, L.J. (2005) Técnicas de colecta y preservación de insectos. Boletín Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa 37, 385–408.Google Scholar
Meza-Hernández, J.S. & Díaz-Fleischer, F. (2006) Comparison of sexual compatibility between laboratory and wild Mexican fruit flies under laboratory and field conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology 99, 1979–1986.Google Scholar
Orozco, D., Hernández, M.R., Meza, J.S. & Quintero, J.L. (2013 a) Do sterile females affect the sexual performance of sterile males of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae)? Journal of Applied Entomology 137, 321–326.Google Scholar
Orozco, D., Mesa, J.S., Zepeda, S., Quintero-Fong, J.L. & Solis, E. (2013 b) Tapachula-7, a new genetic sexing strain of the Mexican Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae): sexual compatibility and competitiveness. Journal of Economic Entomology 106, 735–741.Google Scholar
Pérez-Staples, D., Shelly, T.E. & Yuval, B. (2013) Female mating failure and the failure of ‘mating’ in sterile insect programs. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata 146, 66–78.Google Scholar
Rao, D. & Díaz-Fleischer, F. (2012) Characterization of predator-directed displays in tephritid flies. Ethology 118, 1165–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, D., Aguilar-Arguello, S., Montoya, P. & Díaz-Fleisher, F. (2014) The effect of irradiation and mass rearing on the anti-predator behavior of the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 104, 176–181.Google Scholar
Roth, V.D., Ubick, D., Dupérré, N. & American Arachnological Society, (2005) Spiders of North America: An Identification Manual. Poughkeepsie, NY, American Arachnological Society.Google Scholar
SAGARPA (2014) México, entre los líderes en producción de cítricos a nivel mundial. Available online at http://www.sagarpa.gob.mx/Delegaciones/sanluispotosi/boletines/Paginas/BOL1301112.aspx (accessed 21 February 2015).Google Scholar
Santiago, M.G. (2010) Aplicación del concepto de áreas liibres de plagas. pp. 229–242in Montoya, P., Toledo, J. & Hernández, E. (Eds) Moscas de la Fruta: Fundamentos y Procedimientos para su Manejo. México, D.F., S y G Editores.Google Scholar
Santiago, G., Orozco, D., Hernández, M del R., Luis, J. & Bravo, J. (2012) Manual de control de calidad de moscas de la fruta estériles (procedimientos para evaluar el producto en los centros de empaque). Mexico, D.F., SENASICA-Dirección de Moscas de la Fruta.Google Scholar
SENASICA. (2012) Manual Técnico de Control de Calidad en Centros de Empaque. Available online at http://www.SENASICA.gob.mx (accessed 24 March 2015).Google Scholar
Van Der Berg, M.A., Dippenaar-Shoeman, A.S., Deacon, V.E. & Anderson, S.H. (1992) Interactions between Citrus psylla, Trioza erytreae (Hem, Triozidae), and spiders in an unsprayed Citrus orchard in the Transvaal lowveld. Entomophaga 37, 599–608.Google Scholar
Welch, B.J. (1993) Predation by spiders on ground-released screwworm flies, Cochliomyia hominivorax (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in a mountainous area of southern Mexico. The Journal of Arachnology 21, 23–28.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, M.E.A., Hardwick, S., Scholz, B.C.G., Annells, A., Ward, A., Grundy, P. & Harden, S. (2009) Evidence of a latitudinal gradient in spider diversity in Australian cotton. Austral Ecology 34, 10–23.Google Scholar
Yuval, B. & Hendrichs, J. (2000) Behaviour of flies in the genus Ceratitis (Dacinae: Ceratitidini). pp. 429–458in Aluja, M. & Norrbom, A.L. (Eds) Fruit Flies (Tephritidae): Phylogeny and Evolution of Behavior. Boca Raton, USA, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Zepeda, S.C. (2010) Desarrollo de cepas de sexado génetico. pp. 333–342in Montoya, P., Toledo, J. & Hernández, E. (Eds) Moscas de la Fruta: Fundamentos y Procedimientos para su Manejo. México, D.F., S y G Editores.Google Scholar