Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:44:52.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An experimental evaluation of conventional control measures against the sheep tick, Ixodes ricinus (L.) (Acari: Ixodidae). II. The dynamics of the tick-host interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Sarah E. Randolph
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford, UK
Gordon M. Steele
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford, UK

Abstract

The experimental manipulation of separate, but originally identical, populations of Ixodes ricinus (L.) by applying three conventional tick control measures in different enclosures on naturally infested moorland in Wales allowed the elements of the tick-host interaction to be analysed quantitatively and the effectiveness of the control methods to be compared. From the relationship between the sheep stocking density and the numbers of questing ticks picked up by fortnightly blanket-dragging in each enclosure, the death rate of ticks during their activity season and the rate of contact between sheep and ticks were calculated. From this, it was possible to investigate the effect of different stocking densities on the feeding success of ticks. A major factor determining the much lower contact rate for larvae than for nymphs was the different spatial distribution of questing ticks, clumped for larvae and random for nymphs. The non-random use by sheep of the three different vegetation zones in the paddock resulted in the highest contact rate between sheep and ticks in the pasture area, but tick survival was apparently highest in the bog area. Combining these factors resulted in the prediction that the bracken area was the least favourable habitat for ticks. In the two enclosures where the sheep were not treated with acaricide the mean tick loads on the sheep were similar, but the lower overall use of the pasture by the sheep in the low stocking density enclosure (2/ha) resulted in slightly lower tick loads there compared with those in the high stocking density enclosure (4/ha). The numbers of ticks counted in the second year showed that pasture spelling was the most effective control method, acaricide treatment was less effective, and the benefits of halving the stocking density were marginal. The implications of these results for control strategies are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Duncan, J. (1982). Sheep tick project.—pp. 107110in The Game Conservancy, Annual Review for 1981, No. 13.— 123 pp. Fordingbridge, UK, Game Conservancy.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P. & Bennet, I. L. (1973). Stocking intensity and pastoral production.—J. agric. Sci., Camb. 81, 192204.Google Scholar
Gray, J. S. (1981). The fecundity of Ixodes ricinus (L.) (Acarina: Ixodidae) and the mortality of its developmental stages under field conditionsBull. ent. Res. 71, 533542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. S. & Lohan, G. (1982). The development of a sampling method for the tick Ixodes ricinus and its use in a redwater fever area.—Ann. appl. Biol. 101, 421427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, A., (1943). The comparison of sheep-tick populations (Ixodes ricinus L.).—Ann. appl. Biol. 30, 240250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, G. A., Sutherst, R. W. & Maywald, G. F. (1983). A framework for integrating control methods against the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus in Australia.—J. appl. Ecol. 20, 489505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, G. M. (1984). A comparative ecological study of methods for the control of sheep ticks (Ixodes ricinus L.). — 169 pp. D.Phil. thesis, Oxford Univ.Google Scholar
Steele, G. M. & Randolph, S. E. (1985). An experimental evaluation of conventional control measures against the sheep tick, Ixodes ricinus (L.) (Acari: Ixodidae). I. A unimodal seasonal activity pattern.—Bull. ent. Res. 75, 489499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tones, S., (1982). The sheep tick.—Leafl. Minist. Agric. Fish. Fd no. 1-LDS 3401 9/1, 2 pp.Google Scholar