Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:55:47.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The age-composition of biting mosquito populations according to time and level: a further study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Philip S. Corbet
Philip S. Corbet
Affiliation:
The East African Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The age-composition of mosquitos biting at different times and levels was investigated in Zika Forest, Uganda. The four species studied were Mansonia aurites (Theo.) group (material mainly of actual M. aurites (Theo.) but probably including some examples of M. microannulata (Theo.)), Aedes africanus (Theo.), A. ingrami Edw. and Culex annulioris Theo. In each case the biting cycles of nulliparous and parous females were computed separately.

The material examined came from eleven 24-hour catches made by Dr. A. J. Haddow. Samples were taken at seven levels, at 20-ft. intervals, from the ground to a height of 120 ft. The top of the canopy was at 70–80 ft.

In each species the biting cycles of nullipars and pars were closely similar, both at the preferred level and at all levels combined. In only one case (that of the group of M. aurites) was there a significant and consistent difference in the average age of females at different levels, there being a relative excess of older females above the canopy, as found previously in M. fuscopennata (Theo.). This difference persisted throughout the period of biting activity.

These and other recent findings are briefly discussed. It is concluded that the hypothesis which relates the form of the mosquito biting cycle to the age-composition of the biting population and to the larval habitat of the species concerned cannot be accepted as a valid generalisation.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , July 1962 , pp. 409 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bursell, E. (1961). The behaviour of tsetse flies (Glossina swynnertoni Austen) in relation to problems of sampling.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 36 pp. 9–20.Google Scholar
Buxton, A. P. (1952). Observations on the diurnal behaviour of the redtail monkey (Cercopithecus ascanius schmidti Matschie) in a small forest in Uganda. —J. Anim. Ecol. 21 pp. 25–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbet, P. S. (1961a). Studies on the age-composition of mosquito populations. —Rep. E. Afr. Virus Res. Inst. 1960–61 pp. 38–39.Google Scholar
Corbet, P. S. (1961b). Entomological studies from a high tower in Mpanga Forest, Uganda. VIII. The age-composition of biting mosquito populations according to time and level.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 113 pp. 336–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, B. O. L. (1960). Studies on the biting habits of Chrysops. VII. The biting-cycles of nulliparous and parous C. silacca and C. dimidiata (Bombe form).—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 54 pp. 147–155.Google Scholar
Gillett, J. D. (1957). Age analysis of the biting-cycle of the mosquito Taeniorhynchus (Mansonioides) africanus Theobald, based on the presence of parasitic mites.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 51 pp. 151–158.Google Scholar
Gillies, M. T. (1957). Age-groups and the biting cycle in Anopheles gambiac. A preliminary investigation.—Bull. ent. Res. 48 pp. 553–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddow, A. J. (1954). Studies of the biting-habits of African mosquitos. An appraisal of methods employed, with special reference to the twenty-four-hour catch.—Bull. ent. Res. 45 pp. 199–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddow, A. J. (1961a). Studies on the biting habits and medical importance of East African mosquitos in the genus Aëdes. II. Subgenera Mucidus, Diceromyia, Finlaya and Stegomyia.—Bull. ent. Res. 52 pp. 317–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddow, A. J. (1961b). Entomological studies from a high tower in Mpanga Forest, Uganda. VII. The biting behaviour of mosquitoes and Tabanids.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 113 pp. 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddow, A. J. (1961c). Twenty-four-hour catches on the steel tower.—Rep. E. Afr. Virus Res. Inst. 1960–61 pp. 33–35.Google Scholar
Haddow, A. J., Corbet, P. S. & Gillett, J. D. (1961). Entomological studies from a high tower in Mpanga Forest, Uganda. I. Introduction.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 113 pp. 249–256.Google Scholar
Haddow, A. J., Gillett, J. D. & Corbet, P. S. (1961). Removal of steel tower to Zika.—Rep. E. Afr. Virus Res. Inst. 1960–61 pp. 31–32.Google Scholar
Hamon, J., Chauvet, G. & Thélin, L. (1961). Observations sur les méthodes d'évaluation de l'âge physiologique des femelles d'anophèles.—Bull. World Hlth Org. 24 pp. 437–443.Google Scholar
Hopkins, G. H. E. (1952). Mosquitoes of the Ethiopian Region. I. Larval bionomics of mosquitoes and taxonomy of Culicine larvae.—2nd edn., 355 pp. London, Brit. Mus. (nat. Hist.).Google Scholar
Lumsden, W. H. R. (1952). The crepuscular biting activity of insects in the forest canopy in Bwamba, Uganda. A study in relation to the sylvan epidemiology of yellow fever.—Bull. ent. Res. 42 pp. 721–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumsden, W. H. R. (1957). The activity cycle of domestic Aëdes (Stegomyia) aegypti (L.) (Dipt., Culicid.) in Southern Province, Tanganyika.—Bull, ent. Res. 48 pp. 769–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcclelland, G. A. H. (1959). Observations on the mosquito, Aëdes (Stegomyia) aegypti (L.). in East Africa. I. The biting cvcle in an outdoor population at Entebbe, Uganda.—Bull. ent. Res. 50 pp. 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcclelland, G. A. H. (1960). Observations on the mosquito, Aëdes (Stegomyia) aegypti (L.), in East Africa. II. The biting cycle in a domestic population on the Kenya Coast.— Bull. ent. Res. 50 pp. 687–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, W. E. & Corbet, P. S. (1959). Studies on movements of mosquitoes at sunset.— Rep. E. Afr. Virus Res. Inst. 1958–59 pp. 38–39.Google Scholar
Teesdale, C. (1955). Studies on the bionomics of Aëdes aegypti (L.) in its natural habitats in a coastal region of Kenya.—Bull. ent. Res. 46 pp. 711–742.Google Scholar