Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:49:03.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acaricide Resistance in the Blue Tick, Boophilus decoloratus (Koch).—Part I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Extract

Using laboratory tests described, the effectiveness of a number of insecticides on both larval and adult, fully engorged examples of the Blue Tick, Boophilus decoloratus (Koch), was determined. The results of tests using adult ticks were expressed as histograms of the percentage control exerted by varying concentrations of insecticides. The test using larvae was more sensitive and enabled results to be expressed as dose-response curves from which the LC50 could be accurately calculated. By comparing ticks from different localities in South Africa, resistance to a number of insecticides was demonstrated. Adult ticks from the farms Allandale and Ferndale in the East London district were three to four times more tolerant of sodium arsenite than were the sensitive ticks from Frankenwald farm near Johannesburg. Both larval and adult ticks from Ferndale and Allandale, when compared with Frankenwald ticks, were highly resistant to γ BHC, which conferred some cross-resistance to toxaphene, chlordane, dieldrin and aldrin. Ticks from Allandale, in addition to being resistant to sodium arsenite, BHC, toxaphene, chlordane, dieldrin and aldrin were highly resistant to DDT. DDT resistance conferred a cross-resistance to Dilan.

The organo-phosphorus insecticides tested, malathion and diazinon, were equally effective against all ticks.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bekker, P. M. (1953). A blue tick resistant to B.H.C. but not to arsenic.—Fmg in S. Afr., 28, pp. 119120, 136.Google Scholar
Busvine, J. R. & Harrison, C. M. (1953). Tests for insecticide-resistance in lice, mosquitos and house-flies.—Bull. ent. Res., 44, pp. 729738.Google Scholar
Du Toit, R., Graf, H.Bekker, P. M. (1941). Resistance to arsenic as displayed by the single host Blue Tick Boophilus decoloratus (Koch) in a localised area of the Union of South Africa: preliminary report.—J. S. Afr. vet. med. Ass., 12, pp. 5058.Google Scholar
Fiedler, O. G. H. (1952). The lethal effect of some insecticides on the B.H.C.-resistant Blue Tick, Boophilus decoloratus Koch.—Onderstepoort J. vet. Res., 25, pp. 6567.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, L. F. (1953). Resistance of Cattle Tick (Boophilus microplus Canestrini) to benzene hexachloride.—Aust. J. agric. Res., 4, pp. 360364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthysse, J. G. (1954). Report on tick-borne diseases.—28 pp. Lusaka, Dep. vet. Serv., N. Rhod.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. H. (1947). A dipping apparatus for estimating the toxicity of insecticides in liquid media.—Ann. appl. Biol., 34, pp. 233239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metcalf, R. L. (1955). Physiological basis for insect resistance to insecticides.—Physiol. Rev., 35, pp. 197232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternburg, J., Kearns, C. W. & Moorefield, H. (1954). DDT-dehydrochlorinase, an enzyme found in DDT-resistant flies.—J. agric. Fd Chem., 2, pp. 11251130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, G. B. (1956). D.D.T. resistance in the Blue Tick, Boophilus decoloratus, Koch.—J. S. Afr. vet. med. Ass., 27, pp. 117120.Google Scholar
Whitnall, A. B. M. & Bradford, B. (1947). An arsenic-resistant tick and its control with gammexane dips.—Bull. ent. Res., 38, pp. 353372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitnall, A. B. M. & Bradford, B. (1949). An arsenic-resistant tick and its control with gammexane dips. Part II.—Bull. ent. Res., 40, pp. 207226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitnall, A. B. M., Thorburn, J. A., McHardy, W. M., Whitehead, G. B. & Meerholz, F. (1952). A BHC-resistant tick.—Bull. ent. Res., 43, pp. 5165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar