Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:18:18.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Varying efficiency in a group of people sampling cabbage plants for aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. Harrington
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., AL5 2JQ, UK

Abstract

The efficiencies of people sampling cabbage plants in the field for total numbers of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) were found to differ. Significantly more aphids were counted on leaves taken to the laboratory than on leaves examined by inexperienced people in the field, but field counts by an experienced person did not differ significantly from the laboratory sample. The implications of differences between people and the possibility of correcting for them in surveys are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beall, G. (1939). Methods of estimating the population of insects in a field.—Biometrika 30, 422439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewar, A. M., Dean, G. J. & Cannon, R. (1982). Assessment of methods for estimating the numbers of aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in cereals.—Bull. ent. Res. 72, 675685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egglishaw, H. J. (1964). The distributional relationship between the bottom fauna and plant detritus in streams.—J. Anim. Ecol. 33, 463476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. P., Cooling, D. A. & Berrie, A. D. (1984). An evaluation of sampling strategies for qualitative surveys of macro-invertebrates in rivers, using pond nets.—J. appl. Ecol. 21, 515534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar