Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:24:06.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in mitochondrial COII gene sequences among two species of Japanese knotweed-boring moths, Ostrinia latipennis and O. ovalipennis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

S. Ohno ,
Y. Ishikawa ,
S. Tatsuki  and
S. Hoshizaki
S. Ohno*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Applied Entomology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
Y. Ishikawa
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Applied Entomology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
S. Tatsuki
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Applied Entomology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
S. Hoshizaki
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Applied Entomology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
*
*Present address: Fruit Fly Eradication Project Office, Okinawa Prefectural Government, Naha, Okinawa 902-0072, Japan Fax: +81 98 884 9119 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Ostrinia latipennis group contains two species, O. latipennis (Warren) and O. ovalipennis Ohno. These two species commonly utilize perennial knotweeds (Fallopia spp.) as their host plants, which are serious invasive weeds in Europe and North America. Ostrinia latipennis is widely distributed across north-east Asia including Japan whereas O. ovalipennis is restricted to north Japan (Hokkaido Is.) and highland areas of central Japan (Nagano Prefecture in Honshu Is.). To estimate the phylogenetic relatedness and geographical differentiation of the two species, mitochondrial COII gene sequences were determined for specimens covering their distribution ranges in Japan. The uncorrected sequence divergence between O. latipennis and O. ovalipennis was 0.6–0.7%, supporting a close relationship. According to the standard molecular clock proposed for arthropod mtDNA, the two species are speculated to have diverged about 0.3 Myr ago. A single COII gene haplotype was found in O. latipennis irrespective of collection locality. In contrast, two haplotypes were found in O. ovalipennis, and their frequencies were significantly different between the Hokkaido and Honshu populations. The patterns of geographical variation in the COII gene within the two species were in agreement with previously reported patterns of geographical differentiation in morphology of the two species in Japan. The present results support the hypothesis that gene flow among local populations of O. ovalipennis has been limited by geographical isolation.

Keywords

cytochrome oxidase subunit IIOstriniaFallopiagene flowJapan
Type
Review Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 96 , Issue 3 , June 2006 , pp. 243 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avise, J.C. (2000) Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, J.W.O. & Whitlock, M.C. (2004) The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Molecular Ecology 13, 729–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballard, J.W.O., Hatzidakis, J., Karr, T.L. & Kreitman, M. (1996) Reduced variation in Drosophila simulans mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 144, 1519–1528.Google Scholar
Beerling, D.J., Bailey, J.P. & Conolly, A.P. (1994) Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) Ronse Decraene. Journal of Ecology 82, 959–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, A.V.Z. (1994) Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91, 6491–6495.Google Scholar
Caterino, M.S., Cho, S. & Sperling, F.A.H. (2000) The current state of insect molecular systematics: a thriving tower of Babel. Annual Review of Entomology 45, 1–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felsenstein, J. (1993) PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package), version 3.5c Seattle University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
Galtier, N., Depaulis, F. & Barton, N.H. (2000) Detecting bottlenecks and selective sweeps from DNA sequence polymorphism. Genetics 155, 981–987.Google Scholar
James, A.C. & Ballard, J.W.O. (2003) Mitochondrial genotype affects fitness in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 164, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnstone, R.A. & Hurst, G.D.D. (1996) Maternally inherited male-killing microorganisms may confound interpretation of mitochondrial DNA variability. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 58, 453–470.Google Scholar
Jukes, T.H. & Cantor, C.R. (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. pp.21–132Munroe, H.N. (ed). Mammalian protein metabolism, Vol. III. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kim, C.-G., Hoshizaki, S., Huang, Y., Tatsuki, S. & Ishikawa, Y. (1999) Usefulness of mitochondrial COII gene sequences in examining phylogenetic relationships in the Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis, and allied species (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 34, 405–411.Google Scholar
Landy, B., Powell, J.A. & Sperling, F.A.H. (1999) Systematics of the Argyrotaenia franciscana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) species group: evidence from mitochondrial DNA. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 92, 40–46.Google Scholar
Liu, H. & Beckenbach, A.T. (1992) Evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene among 10 orders of insects. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1, 41–52.Google Scholar
Maynard-Smith, J. & Haigh, J. (1974) The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genetical Research, Cambridge 23, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutuura, A. & Munroe, E. (1970) Taxonomy and distribution of the European corn borer and allied species (genus Ostrinia). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 71, 1–112.Google Scholar
Ohno, S. (1998) Geographic variation in morphological characters of the Far Eastern knotweed borer, Ostrinia latipennis (Lepidoptera, Crambidae, Pyraustinae). Transactions of the Lepidopterological Society of Japan 49, 295–307. in Japanese with English summaryGoogle Scholar
Ohno, S. (1999) On the genus Ostrinia (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Crambidae) from islands, off Hokkaido (preliminary report). Rishiri Studies 18, 29–34. in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar
Ohno, S. (2000) A case of host expansion in the Far Eastern knotweed borer, Ostrinia latipennis (Lepidoptera, Crambidae, Pyraustinae). Transactions of the Lepidopterological Society of Japan 51, 202–204.Google Scholar
Ohno, S. (2001) New records for geographical distributions of the genus Ostrinia (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Japan. Japanese Journal of Entomology (New Series) 4, 63–64. in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar
Ohno, S. (2003a) A new knotweed-boring species of the genus Ostrinia Hübner (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) from Japan. Entomological Science 6, 77–83.Google Scholar
Ohno, S. (2003b) Systematic study on the Ostrinia latipennis group (Lepidoptera, Crambidae, Pyraustinae) based on morphology, DNA and sex pheromones. PhD dissertation. Tokyo, The University of Tokyo (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Ohno, S., Hoshizaki, S., Ishikawa, Y., Tatsuki, S. & Akimoto, S. (2003a) Allometry of male genitalia in a lepidopteran species, Ostrinia latipennis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 38, 313–319.Google Scholar
Ohno, S., Hoshizaki, S., Ishikawa, Y. & Tatsuki, S. (2003b) New records of Ostrinia ovalipennis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) from Hokkaido, and morphometric analysis for species identification and geographic variation. Applied Entomology and Zoology 38, 529–535.Google Scholar
Rokas, A., Atkinson, R.J., Brown, G.S., West, S.A. & Stone, G.N. (2001) Understanding patterns of genetic diversity in the oak gallwasp Biorhiza pallida: demographic history or a Wolbachia selective sweep. Heredity 87, 294–304.Google Scholar
Saitou, N. & Nei, M. (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4, 406–425.Google Scholar
Serizawa, K., Suzuki, H., Iwasa, M.A., Tsuchiya, K., Pavlenko, M.V., Kartavtseva, I.V., Chelomina, G.N., Dokuchaev, N.E. & Han, S.-H. (2002) A spatial aspect on mitochondrial DNA genealogy in Apodemus peninsulae from East Asia. Biochemical Genetics 40, 149–161.Google Scholar
Shaw, R.H. & Seiger, L.A. (2002) Japanese knotweed. pp. 159–166 in Van Driesche, R.Biological control of invasive plants in the eastern United States. USDA Forest Service Publication, FHTHT–2002–04.Google Scholar
Shaw, R.H., Evans, H.C., Djeddour, D.H., Tanner, R., Child, L. & Bailey, J.P. (2004) Biological control of Japanese knotweed, Fallopia japonica CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre Annual Report 2003 27 CABI Bioscience Switzerland CentreGoogle Scholar
Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H. & Flook, P. (1994) Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87, 651–701.Google Scholar
Sperling, F.A.H. & Hickey, D.A. (1994) Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation in the spruce budworm species complex (Choristoneura: Lepidoptera). Molecular Biology and Evolution 11, 656–665.Google Scholar
Sperling, F.A.H. & Landry, J.-F., Hickey, D.A. (1995) DNA-based identification of introduced ermine moth species in north America (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 88, 155–162.Google Scholar
Sperling, F.A.H., Byers, R. & Hickey, D.A. (1996) Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation among pheromotypes of the dingy cutworm, Feltia jaculifera (Gn.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 74, 2109–2117.Google Scholar
Sperling, F.A.H., Raske, A.G. & Otvos, I.S. (1999) Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation among populations and host races of Lambdina fiscellaria (Gn.) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Insect Molecular Biology 8, 97–106.Google Scholar
Stouthamer, R., Breeuwer, J.A.J. & Hurst, G.D.D. (1999) Wolbachia pipientis: microbial manipulator of arthropod reproduction. Annual Review of Microbiology 53, 71–102.Google Scholar
Templeton, A.R., Crandall, K.A., Sing, C.F. (1992) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132, 619–633.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson, T.J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22, 4673–4680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, D.-X. & Hewitt, G.M. (1996) Nuclear integrations: challenges for mitochondrial DNA markers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11, 247–251.Google Scholar
Zhang, D.-X. & Hewitt, G.M. (1997) Insect mitochondrial control region: a review of its structure, evolution and usefulness in evolutionary studies. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 25, 99–120.Google Scholar