Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:27:35.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trap design for monitoring moth biodiversity in tropical rainforests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. Intachat  and
I.P. Woiwod
J. Intachat
Affiliation:
Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong, 52109 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
I.P. Woiwod*
Affiliation:
Entomology and Nematology Department, IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK
*
* Fax: 01582 760981 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experimental comparisons were made between samples of moths obtained by Rothamsted tungsten-filament and Robinson mercury-vapour light-traps operating in a lowland dipterocarp forest in Peninsular Malaysia. The Rothamsted trap gave more uniform and consistent samples and performed better in the tropical conditions than the Robinson trap. There were no significant differences between the overall measurement of diversity for the group Geometroidea between the two trap designs although the Robinson trap was much more erratic from night to night. The total catch of non-Geometroidea moths was remarkably similar in the two trap types. The choice of appropriate light-trap designs for biodiversity studies in tropical rainforest is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 89 , Issue 2 , February 1999 , pp. 153 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anscombe, F.J. (1950) Sampling theory of the negative binomial and logarithmic series distributions. Biometrika 37, 358–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, P.S. (1976) Mixed dipterocarp forest and its variation with habitat in the Malayan lowlands: a re-evaluation at Pasoh. Malayan Forester 39, 56–72.Google Scholar
Barlow, H.S. (1982) An introduction to the moths of South East Asia. 305 pp. Kuala Lumpur, The Malayan Nature Society.Google Scholar
Barlow, H.S. & Woiwod, I.P. (1989) Moth diversity of a tropical forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 5, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, H.S. & Woiwod, I.P. (1990) Seasonality and diversity of macrolepidoptera in two lowland sites in the Dumoga-Bone National Park, Sulawesi Utara. pp. 167–172in Knight, W.J. & Holloway, J.D. (Eds) Insects and the rain forests of South East Asia. The Royal Entomological Society of London.Google Scholar
Chey, V.K., Holloway, J.D. & Speight, M.R. (1997) Diversity of moths in forest plantations and natural forests in Sabah. Bulletin of Entomological Research 87, 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, K.J. & McArdle, B.H. (1994) The temporal variability of animal abundances – measures, methods and patterns. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 345, 335–358.Google Scholar
Harrington, R., Woiwod, I.P. & Sparks, T.H. (1999) Climate change and trophic interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution (in press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holloway, J.D. (1980) Insect surveys – an approach to environmental monitoring. Atti XII Congresso Nazionale Italiano Entomologica Roma 1, 231–261.Google Scholar
Holloway, J.D. (1984) The larger moths of the Gunung Mulu National Park; a preliminary assessment of their distribution, ecology and potential as environmental indicators. The Sarawak Museum Journal XXX 51, 150–191.Google Scholar
Holloway, J.D. (1987) Macrolepidoptera diversity in the Indo-Australia tropics: geographic, biotic and taxonomic variation. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 30, 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, J.D. (1994) The moths of Borneo: family Geometridae, subfamily Ennominae. Malayan Nature Journal 47, 1–309.Google Scholar
Holloway, J.D. (1996) The moths of Borneo: family Geometridae, subfamilies Oenochrominae, Desmobathrinae and Geometrinae. Malayan Nature Journal 49, 1–147.Google Scholar
Holloway, J.D. (1997) The moths of Borneo: family Geometridae, subfamilies Sterrhinae and Larentiinae. Malayan Nature Journal 51, 1–242.Google Scholar
Holloway, J.D. (1998) The moths of Borneo: families Castniidae, Callidulidae, Drepanidae and Uraniidae. Malayan Nature Journal 52, 1–155.Google Scholar
Holloway, J.D., Kirk-Spriggs, A.H. & Chey, V.K. (1992) The response of some rain forest insect groups to logging and conversion to plantation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 335, 425–436.Google Scholar
Intachat, J., Holloway, J.D. & Speight, M.R. (1997) The effects of different forest management practices on geometroid moth populations and their diversity in Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 9, 411–430.Google Scholar
Intachat, J., Holloway, J.D. & Speight, M.R. (1999a) The impact of logging on geometroid moth populations and their diversity in lowland forests of Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 11, 61–78.Google Scholar
Intachat, J., Chey, V.K., Holloway, J.D. & Speight, M.R. (1999b) The impact of forest plantation development on geometrid moth (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) populations and their diversity in Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 11, (in press).Google Scholar
Lawton, J.H., Bignell, D.E., Bolton, B., Bloemers, G.F., Eggleton, P., Hammond, P.M., Hodda, M., Holt, R.D., Larson, T.B., Mawdsley, N.A., Stork, N.E., Srivastava, D.S. & Watt, A.D. (1998) Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391, 72–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leinonen, R., Söderman, G., Itämies, J., Rytkönen, S. & Rutanen, I. (1998) Intercalibration of different light-traps and bulbs used in moth monitoring in northern Europe. Entomologica Fennica 9, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luff, M.L. & Woiwod, I.P. (1995) Insects as indicators of land-use change: a European perspective, focusing on moths and ground beetles. pp. 399–422in Harrington, R. & Stork, N.E. (Eds) Insects in a changing environment. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Magurran, A.E. (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manokaran, N. & Kochummen, K.M. (1990) A re-examination of data on structures and floristic composition of hill and lowland dipterocarp forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Malayan Nature Journal 44, 61–75.Google Scholar
Muirhead-Thomson, R.C. (1991) Trap responses of flying insects: the influence of trap design on capture efficiency. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nieminen, M. (1996) International moth monitoring scheme – proceedings of a seminar Helsinki, Finland10. April 1996TemaNord 1996:630 CopenhagenNordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
Robinson, G.S. & Tuck, K.R. (1996) Describing and comparing high invertebrate diversity in tropical forest – a case study of small moths in Borneo. pp. 29–42in Edwards, D.S. et al. Tropical rainforest research – current issues. The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, H.S. & Robinson, P.J.M. (1950) Some notes on the observed behaviour of Lepidoptera in flight in the vicinity of light sources together with a description of a light-trap designed to take entomological samples. Entomologist's Gazette 1, 3–15.Google Scholar
Ross, G.J.S. (1987) MLP manuals. Oxford, Numerical Algorithm Group.Google Scholar
Salleh Mohd. Nor. (1968) Jelebu District, Negeri Sembilan, Forest Resource Reconnaissance Survey of Malay, Report No. 21. Forest Research Institute, Forest Department, Malaya.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry. 3rd edn. New York, W.H.Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. (1978) Ecological methods; with particular reference to the study of insect populations. 2nd edn. London, Chapman Hall.Google Scholar
Sutton, S.L. (1983) The spatial distribution of flying insects in tropical rain forests. pp. 77–91in Whitmore, T.C. & Chadwick, A.C. (Eds). Tropical rain forest: ecology and management. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Taylor, L.R. (1978) Bates, Williams, Hutchinson – a variety of diversities. pp. 1–18in Mound, L.A. & Waloff, N. (Eds) The diversity of insect faunas. The Royal Entomological Society of London.Google Scholar
Taylor, L.R. & Brown, E.S. (1972) Effects of light-trap design and illumination on samples of moths in the Kenya highlands. Bulletin of Entomological Research 62, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L.R. & French, R.A. (1974) Effects of light-trap design and illumination on samples of moths in an English woodland. Bulletin of Entomological Research 63, 583–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L.R., Kempton, R.A. & Woiwod, I.P. (1976) Diversity statistics and the log-series model. Journal of Animal Ecology 45, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, P. (1980) A comparison of the Heath and Robinson M.V. moth traps. Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation 92, 283–289.Google Scholar
Waring, P. (1994) Moth traps and their use. British Wildlife 5, 136–139.Google Scholar
Williams, C.B. (1948) The Rothamsted light trap. Proceedings of Royal Entomological Society London (A) 23, 80–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C.B. (1951) Comparing the efficiency of insect traps. Bulletin of Entomological Research 42, 513–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C.B., French, R.A. & Hosni, M.M. (1955) A second experiment on testing the relative efficiency of insect traps. Bulletin of Entomological Research 46, 93–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woiwod, I.P. (1997) Detecting the effects of climate change on Lepidoptera. Journal of Insect Conservation 1, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woiwod, I.P. & Harrington, R. (1994) Flying in the face of change: the Rothamsted Insect Survey. pp. 321–342in Leigh, R.A. & Johnston, A.E. (Eds) Long-term experiments in agricultural and ecological sciences. Wallingford, CAB International.Google Scholar
Woiwod, I.P. & Riley, A.M. (1969) Moth diversity and long-term trends. pp. 13–21in Nieminen, M. (Ed.) International moth monitoring scheme – proceedings of a seminar Helsinki, Finland10. April 1996TemaNord 1996:630 CopenhagenNordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
Woiwod, I.P. & Thomas, J.A. (1993) The ecology of butterflies and moths at the landscape scale. pp. 76–92in Haines-Young, R. (Ed.) Landscape ecology in Britain. IALE(UK)/Department of Geography, University of Nottingham Working Paper 21.Google Scholar
Wolda, H. (1983) Diversity, diversity indices and tropical cockroaches. Oecologia 58, 290–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, Y.K. & Whitmore, T.C. (1970) On the influence of soil properties on species distribution in a Malayan lowland dipterocarp rain forest. Malayan Forester 33, 42–52.Google Scholar
Wyatt-Smith, J. (1964) A preliminary vegetation map of Malaya with descriptions of vegetation types. Journal of Tropical Geography 18, 200–213.Google Scholar
Wyatt-Smitt, J. (1987) Manual of Malayan silviculture for inland forest, part 3 – Chapter 8. Red Meranti-Keruing forest. Research Pamphlet No. 101, Kepong, Forest Research Institute Malaysia.Google Scholar