Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-n7qbj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T02:32:40.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Survey of British Sheep Blowflies. II. Relation of Strike to Host and edaphic Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. MacLeod
Affiliation:
Cooper Technical Bureau, Berkhamsted.

Extract

The seasonal incidence curve of strike is bimodal, and divisible into four phases, the pre-shearing, the shearing trough, the lamb phase, and the late season adult and lamb phase. About two-thirds of the strikes reported by shepherds occurred in the hindquarters area (this term including the rump and hindlegs). In a lowland flock where all strikes were noted over a five-year period the incidence of hindquarters strikes was much lower (43 per cent.). The shoulders area, in relation to its size, is highly susceptible. It appears to be even more common a site in lowland than in mountain breeds. Rather more than half of the reported cases were in adult sheep, and of these more than half were in shorn sheep. Body strikes were relatively more common in shorn than in woolled sheep. Species other than L. sericata (referred to as alternative species) occurred mainly in mountain breeds or their lowland crosses, and more frequently in body than in breech strikes. Alternative species were more or less equally common in adults and in lambs, except Phormia terraenovae, which was practically confined to adults. The occurrence of alternative species was significantly associated with the type of grazing, and also with the vegetation type on the grazing ; the partial association with vegetation type, with pasture type constant, suggests that presence of bracken and/or heather is closely associated with the conditions resulting in alternative species striking sheep.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishopp, F. C. & Laake, E. W. (1915). J. econ. Ent., 8, p. 466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, W. M. (1934). Ann. appl. Biol., 21, p. 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, W. M. & Hobson, R. P. (1935). Ann. appl. Biol., 22, p. 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, R. P. (1936). Ann. appl. Biol., 23, p. 852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, J. (1937a). J. comp. Path., 50, p. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, J. (1937b). Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond., 12, p. 127.Google Scholar
MacLeod, J. (1943). Bull. ent. Res., 34, p. 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parish, H. E. & Laake, E. W. (1935). J. Parasit., 21, p. 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar