Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:08:59.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies of House Leaving and Outside Resting of Anopheles gambiae Giles and Anopheles funestus Giles in East Africa. I.—The Outside Resting Population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. T. Gillies
Affiliation:
East African Malaria Unit, Amani, Tanganyika.

Extract

The behaviour of Anopheles gambiae Giles and A. funestus Giles was studied under natural conditions in a lowland area of Tanganyika.

Studies on the outside resting population were carried out by direct searching for natural resting sites, and by the use of artificial box shelters partly buried in the ground in shaded localities. Catches in these give a valid sample when set up at some distance from houses.

Fed and gravid females comprised 67 per cent. of the outside resting gambiae population, the latter group being between 12 and 4·5 times as numerous as the former. Rather less than half the funestus females caught were unfed, the remainder of the population being mainly composed of gravid females.

Precipitin tests on the small numbers of fed females caught outside were nearly all positive for man.

The identification of gravid funestus females was confirmed by periodic examination of the eggs.

Entry of females into outside shelters did not occur solely in the period around sunrise. An appreciable number of funestus females did not enter before 07.00 hours and this was particularly so in shaded shelters.

The building of a hut in the vicinity of a box shelter caused a drastic reduction in the numbers of mosquitos resting in the latter.

Outside biting activity in these two species is of negligible importance as a source of females resting outside.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blin, G. (1908). Déstruction des moustiques par le procédé des trous-pièges.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot., 1, pp. 100103.Google Scholar
De Meillon, B. (1934 a). Observations on Anopheles funestus and Anopheles gambiae in the Transvaal.—Publ. S. Afr. Inst. med. Res., 6, no. 32 pp. 195248.Google Scholar
De Meillon, B. (1934 b). Studies on insects of medical importance in South Africa.—Publ. S. Afr. Inst. med. Res., 6, no. 33 pp. 249307.Google Scholar
De Meillon, B. (1936). Anopheles funestus Giles and Anopheles leesoni Evans in human habitations and outdoor haunts.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 30, pp. 12.Google Scholar
De Meillon, B. (1947). The Anophelini of the Ethiopian geographical region.—Publ. S. Afr. Inst. med. Res., 10, no. 49, 272 pp.Google Scholar
De Zulueta, J. (1950). A study of the habits of the adult mosquitoes dwelling in the Savannas of eastern Colombia.—Amer. J. trop. Med., 30, pp. 325339.Google Scholar
De Zulueta, J. (1952). Observations on mosquito density in an endemic malarious area in eastern Colombia.—Amer. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 1, pp. 314329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A. M. & Garnham, P. C. C. (1936). The funestus series of Anopheles at Kisumu and a coastal locality in Kenya.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 30, pp. 511520.Google Scholar
Evans, A. M. & Leeson, H. S. (1935). The funestus series of Anopheles in Southern Rhodesia, with description of a new variety.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit., 29, pp. 3347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyles, D. E. & Bishop, L. K. (1943). The microclimate of diurnal resting places of Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say in the vicinity of Reelfoot Lake.—Publ. Hlth Rep., 58, pp. 217230.Google Scholar
Gillies, M. T. (1953). The duration of the gonotrophic cycle in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus, with a note on the efficiency of hand catching.—E. Afr. med. J., 30, pp. 129135.Google ScholarPubMed
Gillies, M. T. (1954). Studies in house leaving and outside resting of Anopheles gambiae Giles and Anopheles funestus Giles in East Africa. II. The exodus from houses and house resting population.—Bull. ent. Res., 45, pp. 375387.Google Scholar
Hocking, K. S. & MacInnes, D. G. (1948). Notes on the bionomics of Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus in East Africa.—Bull. ent. Res., 39, pp. 453465.Google Scholar
Holstein, M. H. (1952). Biologie d'Anopheles gambiae.—Monogr. Ser. World Hlth. Org., no. 9, 176 pp.Google Scholar
Leeson, H. S. (1931). Anopheline mosquitoes in Southern Rhodesia, 1926–1928.—Mem. Lond. Sch. Hyg. trop. Med., no. 4, 55 pp.Google Scholar
Macan, T. T. (1950). The anopheline mosquitoes of Iraq and north Persia.—Mem. Lond. Sch. Hyg. trop. Med., no. 7, pp. 109219.Google Scholar
Muirhead Thomson, R. C. (1948). Studies on Anopheles gambiae and A. melas in and around Lagos.—Bull. ent. Res., 38, pp. 527558.Google Scholar
Muirhead Thomson, R. C. (1951 a). Mosquito behaviour in relation to malaria transmission and control in the Tropics.—219 pp. London, Arnold.Google Scholar
Muirhead Thomson, R. C. (1951 b). Studies on salt-water and fresh-water Anopheles gambiae on the East African coast. Bull. ent. Res., 41, pp. 487502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, P. F. & Santiago, D. (1934). An earth-lined trap for anopheline mosquitoes.—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash., 36, pp. 121.Google Scholar
Senior, White R. A. (1951). Studies on the bionomics of Anopheles aquasalis Curry, 1932. Part II.—Indian J. Malar., 5, pp. 465512.Google Scholar
Symes, C. B. (1941). Malaria in Nairobi.—E. Afr. med. J., 17, pp. 414430.Google Scholar
Wharton, R. H. (1950). Daytime resting places of Anopheles maculatus and other Anophelines in Malaya, with results of precipitin tests.—Med. J. Malaya, 4, pp. 260271.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. B. (1936). Report of the Malaria Unit, Tanga, 1933–34.—71 pp. Dar es Salaam, Govt. Printer.Google Scholar
Wiseman, R. H., Symes, C. B., McMahon, J. C. & Teesdale, C. (1939). Report on a malaria survey of Mombasa.—60 pp. Nairobi, Govt. Printer.Google Scholar