Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:16:35.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pygostolus falcatus (Nees) (Hymenoptera, Braconidae), a parasite of Sitona species (Coleoptera, Curculionidae).*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Conrad Loan  and
F. G. Holdaway
Conrad Loan
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute for Biological Control, Belleville, Ontario, Canada
F. G. Holdaway
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Economic Zoology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 1, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Pygostolus falcatus (Nees), an endoparasitic Braconid of the subfamily Blacinae, was reared from Sitona lineatus (L.), S. hispidulus (F.) and S. humeralis Steph. of Swedish origin. The life-history and immature stages of P. falcatus were studied in the laboratory at 74°F. and in field cages preparatory to its liberation in Canada as a control agent of the sweetclover weevil, S. cylindricollis Fhs.

The immature stages develop in the haemocoele of the weevil. After deposition, the egg increases in volume to a maximum of 335 times. At eclosion, the cells of the trophamnion dissociate and increase in volume in relation to the growth of the larva. Supernumerary larvae are eliminated soon after eclosion, and one larva only develops in a host weevil. At 74°F., the final-instar larva emerges from the host weevil 15–16 days after deposition of the egg. Development of many first-instar larvae in a wide range of Sitona species was arrested by diapause. Five larval instars are described and illustrated. Oviposition is prevented in weevils in the summer of their development and eliminated in overwintered weevils by the parasite egg and first-instar larva. The weevil dies within hours of emergence of the parasite larva.

Reproduction is parthenogenetic and thely tokous. The maximum number of eggs laid by a female was 46; the number of eggs laid per day per female varied from 0 to 11. Oviposition takes place both in light and in complete darkness and a preference among species of Sitona was not evident. The maximum number of weevils parasitised by a female in a field cage was 39; the number parasitised per day varied from 0 to 8.

The species overwinters as a first-instar larva in weevils which became adult in the previous summer. There were two discrete parasite generations in 1958 in Swedish weevils, both of which developed in early and mid-summer within overwintered weevils. The maximum rate of parasitism of S. lineatus by larvae of the mid-summer parasite generation in 1958 was 73·3 per cent.

The value of P. falcatus as a control agent of Sitona populations is limited by low parasitism of the new weevil generation of the current year and diapause of the first-instar larva.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , October 1961 , pp. 473 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, A. A. (1948). Barynotus moerens F. (Col., Curculionidae) heavily parasitized by Pygostolus sticticus F. (Ruthe) (Hym., Braconidae).— Ent. mon. Mag. 84 p. 48.Google Scholar
Díaz, B. (1923). Un bracónido parásito de insecto perfecto.—Rev. Fitopatologia 1 pp. 108–110. (Rev. appl. Ent. (A) 12 p. 146.)Google Scholar
Grossheim, N. A. (1928). Data for the study of the genus Sitona Germ. [In Russian.]—Bull. Mleev hort. Exp. Sta. no. 17, 57 pp. (R.A.E., (A) 17 pp. 434–436.)Google Scholar
Hinton, H. E. (1954). Insect blood.—Sci. Progr. 42 pp. 684–696.Google Scholar
Hollande, A. C. (1920). Oenocytoides et tératocytes du sang des chenilles.—C. R. Acad. Sci. 170 pp. 1341–1344.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. J. (1922). Bionomics of weevils of the genus Sitona injurious to leguminous crops in Britain. Part II.—Ann. appl. Biol. 9 pp. 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. J. (1928). The biology of Dinocampus (Perilitus) rutilus Nees, a Braconid parasite of Sitona lineata L. Part I.—Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 1928 pp. 597–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. J. (1935). Giant cells in insects parasitised by Hymenopterous larvae.—Nature, Lond. 135 pp. 1040–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. A. (1889). A monograph of the British Braconidae.—Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1889 pp. 149–211.Google Scholar
Meyer, N. F. (1934). Schlupfwespen, die in Russland; in den letzten Jahren aus Schädlingen gezogen sind.—Z. angew. Ent. 20 pp. 611–618.Google Scholar
Ogloblin', A. A. (1913). On the biology of Coccinellids. [In Russian.]—Rev. russe Ent. 13 pp. 27–43. (R.A.E. (A) 1 pp. 457–458.)Google Scholar
Schneider, F. (1950). Die Entwicklung des Syrphidenparasiten Diplazon fissorius Grav. (Hym., Ichneum.) in uni-, oligo- und polyvoltinen Wirten und sein Verhalten bei parasitärer Aktivierung der Diapauselarven durch Diplazon pectoratorius Grav.—Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 23 pp, 155–194.Google Scholar
Short, J. R. T. (1952). The morphology of the head of larval Hymenoptera with special reference to the head of the Ichneumonoidea, including a classification of the final instar larvae of the Braconidae.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 103 pp. 27–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, O. J. (1952). Biology and behavior of Microctonus vittatae Muesebeek (Braconidae) with descriptions of its immature stages.—Univ. Calif. Publ. Ent. 9 pp. 315–344.Google Scholar
Stich, R. (1929). Ueber Imaginalparasiten aus der Familie der Braconiden bei Käfern.—Z. wiss. InsektBiol. 24 pp. 89–96.Google Scholar
Ulashkevich, M. I. (1935). Nodule weevils of the species Sitona lineata L. and Sitona crinita Hbst. [In Ukrainian.]—Vinnitza reg. agric. Exp. Sta. Kiev, no. 23, 75 pp. (R.A.E. (A) 24 pp. 452–453.)Google Scholar
Wagn, O. (1954). …Observations on the presence of pea and bean weevils (Sitona spp.) in leguminous crops. [In Danish.]—Tidsskr. Planteavl 57 pp. 706–712.Google Scholar