Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:43:14.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protein requirements for oogenesis in the Australian bush fly, Musca vetustissima Walker (Diptera: Muscidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

L. Hayles  and
J. N. Matthiessen
L. Hayles
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Private Bag, P.O. Wembley, Western Australia6014
J. N. Matthiessen
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Entomology, Private Bag, P.O. Wembley, Western Australia6014
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Females of Musca vetustissima Walker in the first ovarian cycle and of a wide range of body size were fed a range of measured quantities of protein-rich liver exudate. For a given amount of exudate, a greater proportion of large flies than of small ones matured oocytes; for a given size of fly, the proportion that matured oocytes increased with the amount of exudate ingested. Additionally, large flies matured more oocytes on less exudate than did small flies, which had fewer ovarioles.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , September 1987 , pp. 391 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Greenham, P. M. (1972). The effects of the variability of cattle dung on the multiplication of the bushfly (Musca vetustissima Walk.).—J. Anim. Ecol. 41, 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. D. (1974). Variation in the proportion of different reproductive stages of female bushflies (Musca vetustissima Wlk. (Diptera, Muscidae)) in bait catches as a cause of error in population estimates.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. D. (1977). The population dynamics of the bushfly: the elucidation of population events in the field.—Aust. J. Ecol. 2, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. D., Greenham, P. M., Tyndale-Biscoe, M. & Walker, J. M. (1972). A synopsis of observations on the biology of the Australian bush fly (Musca vetustissima Walker).—J. Aust. entomol. Soc. 11, 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. E. & Walker, J. M. (1974). Some factors affecting protein feeding and egg development in the Australian bushfly Musca vetustissima.—Entomologia exp. appl. 17, 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, J. N. (1983). The seasonal distribution and characteristics of bush fly Musca vetustissima Walker populations in south-western Australia.—Aust. J. Ecol. 8, 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, J. N. (1985 a). Populations of the bush fly (Musca vetustissima Walker) in arid Australia.—Aust. J. Ecol. 10, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, J. N. (1985 b). Breeding of the bush fly, Musca vetustissima Walker, in an overwintering area during winter and spring.—Aust. J. Ecol. 10, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, J. N. & Hayles, L. (1983). Seasonal changes in characteristics of cattle dung as a resource for an insect in south-western Australia.—Aust. J. Ecol. 8, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, K. R. (1966). Notes on the ecology of the bushfly, Musca vetustissima Walk. (Diptera: Muscidae), in the Canberra district.—Aust. J. Zool. 14, 1139–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, P. & Hughes, R. D. (1976). A simulation model of seasonal changes in the value of cattle dung as a food resource for an insect.—Agric. Meteorol. 17, 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, P. & Hughes, R. D. (1976). Mathematical model of the survival rates of female bushflies (Musca vetustissima Walker) (Diptera: Muscidae) as inferred from field populations.—Bull. ent. Res. 67, 675–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyndale-Biscoe, M. & Hughes, R. D. (1969). Changes in the female reproductive system as age indicators in the bushfly Musca vetustissima Wlk.—Bull. ent. Res. 59, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar