Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:29:08.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monoclonal antibodies reveal the potential of the tetragnathid spider Pachygnatha degeeri (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) as an aphid predator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J.D. Harwood ,
K.D. Sunderland  and
W.O.C. Symondson
J.D. Harwood*
Affiliation:
School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, PO Box 915, Cardiff, CF10 3TL, UK
K.D. Sunderland
Affiliation:
Warwick HRI, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF, UK
W.O.C. Symondson
Affiliation:
School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, PO Box 915, Cardiff, CF10 3TL, UK
*
*Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, S-225 Agricultural Science Center North, Lexington, KY 40546-0091, USA. Fax:859-323-1120 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The drive towards a more sustainable and integrated approach to pest management has engendered a renewed interest in conservation biological control, the role of natural enemy communities and their interactions with prey. Monoclonal antibodies have provided significant advances in enhancing our knowledge of trophic interactions and can be employed to help quantify predation on target species. The tetragnathid spider Pachygnatha degeeri Sundevall was collected from fields of winter wheat in the UK and assayed by ELISA for aphid proteins. It was demonstrated that this spider did not simply consume greater quantities of aphids because it was bigger. In addition, P. degeeri contained significantly greater concentrations of aphid in their guts than other spiders, showing that aphids comprised a greater proportion of their diet. Although P. degeeri constituted only 6% of the spider population numerically, females and males respectively contained 16% and 37% of total aphid proteins within all spiders screened, significantly more than their density would predict. These spiders also preyed upon aphids at a disproportionately high rate in June, during the aphid establishment phase, theoretically the best time for limiting growth in the aphid population. Although less abundant than other generalist predators, the capability of these hunting spiders to consume large numbers of aphids highlights them as a more significant component of the predator complex than had previously been realized. Limitation of aphid numbers early in the year by generalist predators provides more time for the specialist aphid predators and parasitoids to move in.

Type
Review Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 161 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agustí, N., Shayler, S.P., Harwood, J.D., Vaughan, I.P., Sunderland, K.D., Symondson, W.O.C. (2003) Collembola as alternative prey sustaining spiders in arable ecosystems: prey detection within predators using molecular markers. Molecular Ecology 12, 3467–3475Google Scholar
Alderweireldt, M. (1994) Day/night activity rhythms of spiders occurring in crop-rotated fields. European Journal of Soil Biology 30, 55–61Google Scholar
Alderweireldt, M., De Keer, R. (1990) Field and laboratory observations on the life cycle of Pachygnatha degeeri Sundevall, 1830 and Pachygnatha clercki Sundevall, 1823 (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). Acta Zoologica Fennica 190, 35–39Google Scholar
Araya, J.E., Chambron, S.E., Ratcliffe, R.H. (1996) Development and reproduction of two colour forms of English grain aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environmental Entomology 25, 366–369Google Scholar
Barth, F.G. (1982) Spiders and vibratory signals: sensory reception and behavioral significance. pp. 67–122 in Witt, P.N.Rovner, J.S. (Eds) Spider communication. Mechanisms and ecological significance. New Jersey, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bilde, T., Toft, S. (2001) The value of three cereal aphid species as a food for a generalist predator. Physiological Entomology 26, 58–68Google Scholar
Calder, C.R., Harwood, J.D., Symondson, W.O.C. (2005) Detection of scavenged material in the guts of predators using monoclonal antibodies: a significant source of error in measurement of predation. Bulletin of Entomological Research 95, 57–62Google Scholar
Chang, G.C., Kareiva, P. (1999) The case for indigenous generalists in biological control. pp. in Hawkins, B.A.Cornell, H.C. (Eds) 103–115 Theoretical approaches to biological control. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chiverton, P.A. (1986) Predator density manipulation and its effect on populations of Rhopalosiphum padi (Hom.: Aphididae) in spring barley. Annals of Applied Biology 109, 49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBach, P., Rosen, D. (1991) Biological control by natural enemies, London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gurr, G.M., Wratten, S.D., Barbosa, P. (2000) Success in conservation biological control of arthropods. pp. 105–132 in Gurr, G.M.Wratten, S.D. (Eds) Biological control: measures of success. London, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Harwood, J.D., Phillips, S.W., Sunderland, K.D., Symondson, W.O.C. (2001a) Secondary predation: quantification of food chain errors in an aphid – spider – carabid system using monoclonal antibodies. Molecular Ecology 10, 2049–2057Google Scholar
Harwood, J.D., Sunderland, K.D., Symondson, W.O.C. (2001b) Living where the food is: web-location by linyphiid spiders in relation to prey availability in winter wheat. Journal of Applied Ecology 38, 88–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, J.D., Sunderland, K.D., Symondson, W.O.C. (2003) Web-location by linyphiid spiders: prey specific aggregation and foraging strategies. Journal of Animal Ecology 72, 745–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, J.D., Sunderland, K.D., Symondson, W.O.C. (2004) Prey selection by linyphiid spiders: molecular tracking of the effects of alternative prey on rates of aphid consumption in the field. Molecular Ecology 13, 3549–3560Google Scholar
Landis, D.A., Van der Werf, W. (1997) Early-season predation impacts the establishment of aphids and spread of beet yellows virus in sugar beet. Entomophaga 42, 499–516Google Scholar
Losey, J.E., Denno, R.F. (1998) The escape response of pea aphids to foliar-foraging predators: factors affecting dropping behaviour. Ecological Entomology 23, 53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losey, J.E., Denno, R.F. (1999) Positive predator–predator interactions: enhanced predation effects and synergistic suppression of aphid populations. Ecology 79, 2143–2152Google Scholar
Madsen, M., Terkildsen, S., Toft, S. (2004) Microcosm studies on control of aphids by generalist arthropod predators: effects of alternative prey. BioControl 49, 483–504Google Scholar
Marcussen, B.M., Axelsen, J.A., Toft, S. (1999) The value of two Collembola species as food for a cereal spider. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 92, 29–36Google Scholar
Mayntz, D., Toft, S. (2001) Nutrient composition of the prey's diet affects growth and survivorship of a generalist predator. Oecologia 127, 207–213CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murdoch, W.W., Chesson, J., Chesson, P.L. (1985) Biological control in theory and practice. American Naturalist 125, 344–366Google Scholar
Nyffeler, M., Breene, R.G. (1990) Spiders associated with selected European hay meadows, and the effects of habitat disturbance, with the predation ecology of the crab spiders, Xysticus spp. (Araneae, Thomisidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 110, 149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyffeler, M., Sunderland, K.D. (2003) Composition, abundance and pest control potential of spider communities in agroecosystems: a comparison on European and US studies. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 95, 579–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, J.N., Ellis, S.A., Walters, K.F.A., Watling, M. (1993) The effect of cereal aphid feeding on plant quality. Aspects of Applied Biology 36, 383–390Google Scholar
Oswald, J.W., Houston, B.R. (1951) A new virus disease of cereals transmissible by aphids. Plant Disease Reporter 55, 471–475Google Scholar
Oswald, J.W., Houston, B.R. (1953) The yellow dwarf virus of cereal crops. Phytopathology 43, 128–136Google Scholar
Persons, M.H., Uetz, G.W. (1997) The effect of prey movement on attach behavior and patch residence decision rules of wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 10, 737–752Google Scholar
Persons, M.H., Uetz, G.W. (1998) Presampling sensory information and prey density consumption by wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). Behavioural Ecology 9, 360–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratschker, U.M., Roth, M. (2000) Studies on ground dwelling spiders (Araneae) of agrarian habitat types in Northeast Germany: ecological and nature conservation aspects. Ekologia Bratislava 19, 213–225Google Scholar
Samu, F., Vörös, G., Botos, E. (1996) Diversity and community structure of spiders of alfalfa fields and grassy field margins in South Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 31, 253–266Google Scholar
Settle, W.H., Ariawan, H., Astuti, E.T., Cahyana, W., Hakim, A.L., Hindayana, D., Lestari, A.S., Sartanto, P. (1996) Managing tropical rice pests through conservation of generalist natural enemies and alternative prey. Ecology 77, 1975–1988Google Scholar
Sunderland, K.D., Topping, C.J. (1993) The spatial dynamics of linyphiid spiders in winter wheat. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 33, 639–644Google Scholar
Sunderland, K.D., Chambers, R.J., Stacey, D.L., Crook, N.E. (1985) Invertebrate polyphagous predators and cereal aphids. Bulletin SROP/WPRS 8, 105–114Google Scholar
Sunderland, K.D., Fraser, A.M., Dixon, A.F.G. (1986) Distribution of linyphiid spiders in relation to capture of prey in cereal fields. Pedobiologia 29, 367–375Google Scholar
Sunderland, K.D., Crook, N.E., Stacey, D.L., Fuller, B.J. (1987) A study of feeding by the polyphagous predators on cereal aphids using ELISA and gut dissection. Journal of Applied Ecology 24, 907–933Google Scholar
Sunderland, K.D., Axelsen, J.A., Dromph, K., Freier, B., Hemptinne, J.L., Holst, N.H., Mols, P.J.M., Petersen, M.K., Powell, W., Ruggle, P., Triltsch, H., Winder, L. (1997) Pest control by a community of natural enemies. Acta Jutlandica 72, 271–326Google Scholar
Symondson, W.O.C. (2002) Molecular identification of prey in predator diets. Molecular Ecology 11, 627–641Google Scholar
Symondson, W.O.C., Liddell, J.E. (1993) Differential antigen decay rates during digestion of molluscan prey by carabid predators. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 69, 277–287Google Scholar
Symondson, W.O.C., Liddell, J.E. (1995) Decay rates for slug antigens within the carabid predator Pterostichus melanarius monitored with a monoclonal antibody. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 75, 245–250Google Scholar
Symondson, W.O.C., Liddell, J.E. (1996) A species-specific monoclonal antibody system for detecting the remains of field slugs, Deroceras reticulatum (Müller) (Mollusca: Pulmonata), in carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Biocontrol Science and Technology 6, 91–99Google Scholar
Symondson, W.O.C., Erickson, M.L., Liddell, J.E., Jayawardena, K.G.I. (1999) Amplified detection, using a monoclonal antibody, of an aphid-specific epitope exposed during digestion in the gut of a predator. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 29, 873–882Google Scholar
Symondson, W.O.C., Erickson, M.L., Liddell, J.E., Langdon, C.J. (2000) Do earthworms help to sustain the slug predator Pterostichus melanarius (Coleoptera: Carabidae) within crops? Investigations using a monoclonal antibody-based detection system. Molecular Ecology 9, 1279–1292Google Scholar
Symondson, W.O.C., Sunderland, K.D., Greenstone, M.H. (2002) Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents. Annual Review of Entomology 47, 561–594Google Scholar
Toft, S. (1995) Value of the aphid Rhopalosiphum padi as food for cereal spiders. Journal of Applied Ecology 32, 552–560Google Scholar
Toft, S. (1997) Acquired food aversion of a wolf spider to three cereal aphids: intra- and interspecific effects. Entomophaga 42, 63–69Google Scholar
Topping, C.J., Sunderland, K.D. (1992) Limitations to the use of pitfall traps in ecological studies exemplified by a study of spiders in a field of winter wheat. Journal of Applied Ecology 29, 485–491Google Scholar
Topping, C.J., Sunderland, K.D. (1994) Methods for quantifying spider density and migration in cereal crops. Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 9, 209–213Google Scholar
Vickerman, G.P., Wratten, S.P. (1979) The biology and pest status of cereal aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Europe: a review. Bulletin of Entomological Research 69, 1–32Google Scholar
Winder, L., Hirst, D.J., Carter, N., Wratten, S.D., Sopp, P.I. (1994) Estimating predation of the grain aphid Sitobion avenae by polyphagous predators. Journal of Applied Ecology 31, 1–12Google Scholar
Winder, L., Alexander, C.J., Holland, J.M., Symondson, W.O.C., Perry, J., Woolley, C. (2005) Predatory activity and spatial pattern: the response of generalist carabids to their aphid prey. Journal of Animal Ecology 74 – In PressGoogle Scholar