Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:34:40.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of moonlight on catches of insects in light-traps in Africa. III. The effective radius of a mercury-vapour light-trap and the analysis of catches using effective radius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

John Bowden  and
Marjory G. Morris
John Bowden
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, England
Marjory G. Morris
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using the inverse square law, estimates can be made of the distances at which illumination from a light-trap is equal to that from background sources. From these distances an index of trap radius can be constructed which can be considered as a measure of trap potential. Between new moon and full moon trap radii vary, depending upon the times of the night at which the trap may be operating, in ratios from about 10:1 to 15:1. A comparable index of light-trap catches can be calculated which allows catches to be examined in relation to changing radius of the trap. Analysis of a series of catches in Uganda and Ghana shows that many species are more abundant than expected in periods of moonlight, particularly at and near full moon, the biggest difference between new moon and full moon being about 10:1 for Marasmia trapezalis (Gn.), whereas the Isoptera, Bostrychidae and Spodoptera triturata (Wlk.) are 3–4 times more frequent at full moon. The ratios between catch at new moon and catch at full moon suggest that the primary determinant of catch is the frequency with which insects cross the boundary of a region of influence whose size is determined by a radius of equal energy. Deductions about the pattern of insect activity through a lunation, and nightly, and the general agreement between curves describing the change in radius of the trap and those of trap catches suggest that changes in catch over a lunation can be explained by changes in the effectiveness of the trap. When corrections are made to allow for such changes, all taxa show some increase in numbers in moonlit periods and in many taxa this increase is substantial. Correction of catches should take account of flight periodicity and this periodicity should, if possible, be confirmed by methods independent of light-traps.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , June 1975 , pp. 303 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agee, H. R. (1972). Sensory response of the compound eye of adult Heliothis zea and H. virescens to ultraviolet stimuli.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 65, 701–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidlingmayer, W. L. (1964). The effect of moonlight on the flight activity of mosquitoes.—Ecology 45, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidlingmayer, W. L. (1967). A comparison of trapping methods for adult mosquitoes: species response and environmental influence.—J. med. Entomol. 4, 200–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowden, J. (1964 a). The Sphingidae (Lepidoptera) of Kwadaso, Ghana, with special reference to their phenology, the influence of moonlight on activity and the effect of weather conditions on abundance and activity—165 pp. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Bowden, J. (1964 b). The relation of activity of two species of Belostomatidae to rainfall and moonlight in Ghana (Hemiptera : Heteroptera).—J. ent. Soc. sth. Afr. 26, 293–301.Google Scholar
Bowden, J. (1973 a). The influence of moonlight on catches of insects in light-traps in Africa. Part I. The moon and moonlight.—Bull. ent. Res. 63, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, J. (1973 b). The significance of moonlight in photoperiodic responses of insects.—Bull. ent. Res. 62, 605–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, J. (1973 c). Neuroptera in the Rothamsted Insect Survey, 1970–72.—Rep. Rothamsted exp. Stn 1972, Pt 2, 208–210.Google Scholar
Bowden, J. & Church, B. M. (1973). The influence of moonlight on catches of insects in light-traps in Africa. Part II. The effect of moon phase on light-trap catches.—Bull. ent. Res. 63, 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E. S., Beits, E. & Rainey, R. C. (1969). Seasonal changes in distribution of the African armyworm, Spodoptera exempta (Wlk.) (Lep., Noctuidae), with special reference to eastern Africa.—Bull. ent. Res. 58, 661–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E. S. & Swaine, G. (1966). New evidence on the migration of moths of the African armyworm, Spodoptera exempta (Wlk.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae).—Bull. ent Res. 56, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullen, M. J. (1969). The biology of giant water bugs (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae) in Trinidad.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 44, 123–136.Google Scholar
Dufay, C. (1964). Contribution a l'étude du phototropisme des Lépidoptères noctuides.—Annls Sci. nat., Zool. Biol. Anim. (12) 6, 281–406.Google Scholar
Duviard, D. (1974), Flight activity of Belostomatidae in Central Ivory Coast.—Oecologia 15, 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisk, F. W. & Pérez, R. P. (1969). Flight activity periods of the sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis, in Puerto Rico.—J. Agric. Univ. P. Rico. 53, 93–99.Google Scholar
Grassé, P. P. & Noirot, C. (1951). Nouvelles recherches sur la biologic de divers termites champignonnistes (Macrotermitinae).—Annls Sci. nat., Zool. Biol. Anim. (11) 13, 291–342.Google Scholar
Haddow, A. J. & Corbet, P. S. (1960). Observations on nocturnal activity in some African Tabanidae (Diptera).—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Land. (A) 35, 1–5.Google Scholar
Haddow, A. J., Yarrow, I. H. H., Lancaster, G. A. & Corbet, P. S. (1966). Nocturnal flight cycle in the males of African doryline ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 41, 103–106.Google Scholar
Hartstack, A. W. Jr., Hollingsworth, J. P. & Lindquist, D. A. (1968). A technique for measuring trapping efficiency of electric insect traps.—J. econ. Ent. 61, 546–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, T. (1965). Ecological and biological studies on the West African firefly Luciola discicollis (Coleoptera: Lampyridae).—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 58, 414–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, E. G. (1967). Experimental induction and elimination of adult diapause and autumnal coloration in Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera).—J. Insect Physiol. 13, 1343–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, E. R., Webb, J. C, Baumhover, A. H., Endris, R. G., Hines, R. W. & Masuda, S. (1972). Activity of tobacco hornworm moths as determined by electrocutor grid traps baited with a blacklight lamp and virgin females.—Environ. Ent. 1, 679–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New, T. R. & Haddow, A. J. (1973). Nocturnal flight activity of some African Mantispidae (Neuroptera).—J.Entomol. (A) 47, 161–168.Google Scholar
Nutting, W. L. (1969). Flight and colony foundation. In Krishna, K. & Weesner, F. M. (Eds) Biology of termites. Vol. 1. 233–282. London, Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinhey, E. (1962). Hawkmoths of central and southern Africa.—139 pp. Cape Town, Longmans, Southern Africa.Google Scholar
Plaut, H. N. (1971). Distance of attraction of moths of Spodoptera littoralis to BL radiation, and recapture of moths released at different distances of an ESA blacklight standard trap—J. econ. Ent. 64, 1402–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provost, M. W. (1959). The influence of moonlight on light-trap catches of mosquitoes.—Ann. ent. soc. Am. 52, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, W. (1970). The ecology and control of Earias (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the western cotton growing areas of Tanzania.—233 pp. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Robertson, I. A. D. (1972). Records of insects taken at light traps in Tanzania. 1. The effect of moonlight on catches of Belostomatidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera).—Misc. Rep. Centre Overseas Pest Res. no. 5, 8 pp.Google Scholar
Robinson, H. S. & Robinson, P. J. M. (1950). Some notes on the observed behaviour of Lepidoptera in flight in the vicinity of light-sources together with a description of a light-trap designed to take entomological samples.—Entomologist's Gaz,. 1, 3–20.Google Scholar
Schütte, F. (1972) Zum Einfluss von Licht—(Duft)—Fallen auf die Populationsdichte von Heliothis zea (Boddie).—Z. angew. Ent. 70, 302–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiles, K. N. (1972). A revision of the genus Naroma (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae).—J. Entomol. (B) 41, 163–174.Google Scholar
Stewart, P. A., Lam, J. J. Jr. & Hoffman, J. D. (1967). Activity of tobacco hornworm and corn earworm moths as determined by traps equipped with blacklight lamps.—J. econ. Ent. 60, 1520–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauber, M. J. & Tauber, C. A. (1969). Diapause in Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera: Chryso-pidae). 1. Effect of photoperiod on reproductively active adults.—Can. Ent. 101, 364–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutt, J. W. (1902, 1904). A natural history of the British Lepidoptera, vols. III, IV.—558 & 535 pp. London, Swann Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Watkins, J. F. & Cole, T. W. (1966). The attraction of army ant workers to the secretions of their queens.—Tex. J. Sci. 18, 254–265.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. (1936). The influence of moonlight on the activity of certain nocturnal insects, particularly of the family Noctuidae, as indicated by a light-trap.—Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (B) 226, 357–389.Google Scholar