Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T11:24:48.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feeding by Leucopis argenticollis and Leucopis piniperda (Diptera: Chamaemyiidae) from the western USA on Adelges tsugae (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) in the eastern USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2017

K. Motley ,
N.P. Havill ,
A.L. Arsenault-Benoit ,
A.E. Mayfield ,
D.S. Ott ,
D. Ross ,
M.C. Whitmore  and
K.F. Wallin
K. Motley
Affiliation:
Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
N.P. Havill
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Hamden, CT, USA
A.L. Arsenault-Benoit
Affiliation:
Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
A.E. Mayfield
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC 28804, USA
D.S. Ott
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
D. Ross
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
M.C. Whitmore
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
K.F. Wallin*
Affiliation:
Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Burlington, VT 05403, USA
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: 802-656-2517 Fax: 802-656-8683 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Leucopis argenticollis (Zetterstedt) and Leucopis piniperda (Malloch) are known to feed on the lineage of Adelges tsugae Annand that is native to western North America, but it is not known if they will survive on the lineage that was introduced from Japan to the eastern USA. In 2014, western Leucopis spp. larvae were brought to the laboratory and placed on A. tsugae collected in either Washington (North American A. tsugae lineage) or Connecticut (Japanese lineage). There were no significant differences in survival or developmental times between flies reared on the two different adelgid lineages. In 2015 and 2016, western Leucopis spp. adults were released at two different densities onto enclosed branches of A. tsugae infested eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr.) in Tennessee and New York. Cages were recovered and their contents examined 4 weeks after release at each location. Leucopis spp. larvae and puparia of the F1 generation were recovered at both release locations and adults of the F1 generation were collected at the Tennessee location. The number of Leucopis spp. offspring collected increased with increasing adelgid density, but did not differ by the number of adult flies released. Flies recovered from cages and flies collected from the source colony were identified as L.argenticollis and L. piniperda using DNA barcoding. These results demonstrate that Leucopis spp. from the Pacific Northwest are capable of feeding and developing to the adult stage on A. tsugae in the eastern USA and they are able to tolerate environmental conditions during late spring and early summer at the southern and northern extent of the area invaded by A. tsugae in the eastern USA.

Keywords

silver flieshemlock woolly adelgidbiological controlTsuga canadensis
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 107 , Issue 5 , October 2017 , pp. 699 - 704
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cheah, C.A. (2011) Sasajiscymnus (=Pseudoscymnus) tsugae . pp. 43–52 in Onken, B. & Reardon, R. (Eds) Implementation and Status of Biological Control of the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid. Morgantown, WV, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. FHTET-2011-04.Google Scholar
Culliney, T.W., Beardsley, J.W. Jr. & Drea, J.J. (1988) Population regulation of the Eurasian Pine Adelgid (Homoptera: Adelgidae) in Hawaii. Journal of Economic Entomology 81(1), 142–147.Google Scholar
DeBach, P. & Rosen, D. (1991) Biological Control by Natural Enemies. 2nd edn. New York, NY, USA, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
deWaard, J.R., Ivanova, N.V., Hajibabaei, M. & Hebert, P.D.N. (2008) Assembling DNA barcodes: analytical protocols. pp. 275–293 in Martin, C.C. (Ed.) Environmental Genomics, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 410. Totowa, New Jersey, Humana Press.Google Scholar
Francke-Grosmann, H. (1963) Einige Beobachtungen über Schäden und Schädlinge in Pinus-radiata-Anpflanzungen bei Valparaiso. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 51, 335–345.Google Scholar
Gaimari, S.D. & Turner, W.J. (1996) Methods for rearing aphidophagous Leucopis spp. (Diptera: Chamaemyiidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 69, 363–369.Google Scholar
Grubin, S.M., Ross, D.W. & Wallin, K.F. (2011) Prey suitability and phenology of Leucopis spp. (Diptera: Chamaemyiidae) associated with hemlock woolly adelgid (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) in the Pacific Northwest. Environmental Entomology 4, 1410–1416.Google Scholar
Havill, N.P., Montgomery, M.E., Yu, G., Shiyake, S. & Caccone, A. (2006) Mitochondrial DNA from hemlock woolly adelgid (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) suggests cryptic speciation and pinpoints the source of the introduction to eastern North America. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99, 195–203.Google Scholar
Havill, N.P., Montgomery, M.E. & Keena, M.A. (2011) Hemlock woolly adelgid and its hemlock hosts: a global perspective. pp. 3–14 in Onken, B. & Reardon, R. (Eds) Implementation and Status of Biological Control of the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid. Morgantown, WV, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. FHTET-2011-04.Google Scholar
Havill, N.P., Shiyake, S., Lamb Galloway, A., Foottit, R.G., Paradis, A., Elkinton, J., Montgomery, M.E., Sano, M. & Caccone, A. (2016) Ancient and modern colonization of North America by hemlock woolly adelgid, Adelges tsugae (Hemiptera: Adelgidae), an invasive insect from East Asia. Molecular Ecology 25(9), 2065–2080.Google Scholar
Kohler, G.R., Stiefel, V.L., Wallin, K.F. & Ross, D.W. (2008) Predators associated with the hemlock woolly adelgid (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) in the Pacific Northwest. Environmental Entomolology 37, 494–504.Google Scholar
Kohler, G.R., Wallin, K.F. & Ross, D.W. (2016) Seasonal phenology and abundance of Leucopis argenticollis, Leucopis piniperda (Diptera: Chamaemyiidae), Laricobius nigrinus (Coleoptera: Deridontidae) and Adelges tsugae (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) in the Pacific Northwest USA. Bulletin of Entomological Research 106(4), 546–550.Google Scholar
Lockwood, J.L., Cassey, P. & Blackburn, T. (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Special Issue: Invasions, Guest Edited by Michael E. Hochberg and Nicholas J. Gotelli 20(5), 223–228.Google Scholar
Mausel, D.L., Davis, G.A., Lamb, A.S., Zilahi-Balogh, G.M.G., Kok, L.T. & Salom, S.M. (2011) Laricobius nigrinus Fender (Coleoptera: Derodontidae). pp. 77–89 in Onken, B. & Reardon, R. (Eds) Implementation and Status of Biological Control of the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid. Morgantown, WV, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. FHTET-2011-04.Google Scholar
Mayfield, A.E. III, Reynolds, B.C., Coots, C.I., Havill, N.P., Brownie, C., Tait, A.R., Hanula, J.L., Joseph, S.V. & Galloway, A.B. (2015) Establishment, hybridization and impact of Laricobius predators on insecticide-treated hemlocks: exploring integrated management of the hemlock woolly adelgid. Forest Ecology and Management 335, 1–10.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F. & Tanasijtshuk, V.N. (1972) Identity of Leucopis argenticollis and description of a new species (Diptera: Chamaemyiid). The Canadian Entomologist 104(12), 1865–1875.Google Scholar
Mooneyham, K.L., Salom, S.M. & Kok, L.T. (2016) Release and colonization of Laricobius osakensis (Coleoptera: Derodontidae), a predator of the hemlock woolly adelgid, Adelges tsugae . Northeastern Naturalist 23, 141–150.Google Scholar
Onken, B. & Reardon, R. (Eds) (2011) Implementation and Status of Biological Control of the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid. Morgantown, WV, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Publication FHTET-2011-04.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2014) R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, Foundation for Statistical Computing, Available online at http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Rawlings, G.B. (1958) Problems of forest entomology in exotic forests in New Zealand. Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Entomology, vol. 4, pp. 241–246.Google Scholar
Ross, D.W., Gaimari, S.D., Kohler, G.R., Wallin, K.F. & Grubin, S.M. (2011) Chamaemyiid predators of the hemlock woolly adelgid from the Pacific Northwest. pp. 97–106 in Onken, B. & Reardon, R. (Eds) Implementation and Status of Biological Control of the Hemlock Woolly Adelgid. Morgantown, WV, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. FHTET-2011-04.Google Scholar
Stoetzel, M.B. (2002) History of the introduction of Adelges tsugae based on voucher specimens in the Smithsonian Institute National Collection of Insects. p. 12 in Onken, B., Reardon, R. & Lashomb, J. (Eds) Proceedings: Hemlock Woolly Adelgid in Eastern North America Symposium, 5–7 February 2002, East Brunswick, NJ. East Brunswick, New Jersey, USDA Forest Service and State Univ. of N.J. Rutgers.Google Scholar
Zondag, R. & Nuttall, M.J. (1989) Pineus laevis (Maskell), pine twig chermes or pine woolly aphid (Homoptera: Adelgidae). pp. 295–297 in Cameraon, P.J., Hill, R.L., Bain, J. & Thomas, W.P. (Eds) Review of Biological Control of Invertebrate Pests and Weeds in New Zealand 1874 to 1987. Technical Communication No. 10. Wallingford, Oxon, UK, CAB International Institute of Biological Control.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, S.E. (1985) Eighty years of biological control in Chile. Historical review and evaluation of the projects undertaken (1903–1983). Agricultura Tecnica 45, 175–183.Google Scholar