Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:56:03.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiments on the control of frit fly, Oscinella frit (L.), on late-sown oats with seed dressings and ‘late’ sprays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

T. J. Legowski  and
H. J. Gould
T. J. Legowski
Affiliation:
National Agricultural Advisory Service, Brooklands Avenue, Cambridge.
H. J. Gould
Affiliation:
National Agricultural Advisory Service, Brooklands Avenue, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In plot trials with seed dressings on late-sown oats against shoot attack by frit fly, Oscinella frit (L.), chiefly near Cambridge, England, γ BHC, parathion, dieldrin, heptachlor, Rogor and WL 1650 (Telodrin) (1,3,4,5,6,7,8,8-octachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,7-niethanophthalan) (dry and wet) reduced the attack but the effect was variable and for the most part not appreciable.

In 1952 and from 1956 to 1960, trials were made on the effect of late sprays of various insecticides applied to late-sown oats when symptoms of frit-fly attack were already conspicuous and sometimes severe. An advantage of this type of treatment over preventive sprays is that it ensures that the treatment is applied only where and when necessary. Single sprays of parathion, dieldrin, γ BHC and Rogor prevented or markedly reduced further attack and they were most effective when applied within about 15 days of the beginning of egg-laying and when plants were in the young seedling stage. Compared with the best treatment of two early preventive sprays of DDT there was only a slight reduction in yield. Parathion and to lesser extent γ BHC killed many larvae inside the shoots and probably prevented others from entering the shoots.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , October 1961 , pp. 443 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1959). Frit fly in spring oats. I. Sampling for first generation shoot attack.—Plant Path. 8 pp. 77–82.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, N. (1925). Studies on Oscinella frit, Linn. A preliminary investigation of the extent of the recovery power of oats when subject to injury.—Ann. appl. Biol. 12 pp. 276–286.Google Scholar
Empson, D. W. (1958). Field trials of DDT against frit fly on spring oats.—Plant Path. 7 pp. 77–80.Google Scholar
Fidler, J. H. (1958). Dieldrin sprays as a control for frit fly in spring oats.—Plant Path. 7 pp. 101–105.Google Scholar
Fidler, J. H. & Webley, D. P. (1956). Seed dressings for the control of frit fly in oats.—Nature, Lond. 178 p. 1480.Google Scholar
Legowski, T. J. & Gould, H. J. (1958). Effect of DDT on egg-laying by Oscinella frit L.—Nature, Lond. 182 pp. 1682–1683.Google Scholar
Strickland, A. H. (1958). Frit-fly attack and yield of oats.—Ann. appl. Biol. 46 pp. 486–493.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. D. (1958). Control of frit fly by chemical means.—Ann. appl. Biol. 46 pp. 497–501.Google Scholar
Walker, P. T. (1953). Action of insecticides on a stem borer of oats: the frit fly.—Nature, Lond. 172 pp. 916–917.Google Scholar
Way, M. J. (1959). Experiments on the mode of action of dieldrin seed-dressings against seedling attack by the larval frit fly, Oscinella frit L.—Ann. appl. Biol. 47 pp. 802–808.Google Scholar