Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:43:02.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of tepa and other aziridine alkylating agents on egg development in the red bollworm Diparopsis castanea Hmps, and the silver Y moth Autographa gamma (L.) (Lep., Noctuidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. G. Campion
D. G. Campion
Affiliation:
Centre for Overseas Pest Research, College House, Wrights Lane, London W8 5SJ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Increased doses of tepa applied by injection to female Diparopsis castanea Hmps. caused a progressive increase in sterility accompanied by a decrease in the number of eggs oviposited from the time of application. After an interval of three days it was shown by histological examination that injected doses of 10 μg of tepa induced degeneration of the developing oocytes and a shrinkage or resorption of some of the mature eggs. After Diparopsis male moths were treated with graduated injected doses of apholate, metepa and tepa and then mated with untreated females, considerable embryonic development without subsequent egg hatch occurred at the lower dosage levels. When tepa-treated Autographa gamma (L.) males at a dose of 10 μg were similarly mated with untreated females histological examination showed that the development of many of the eggs had been arrested at a very early stage; in some instances a greater development, although of an abnormal kind, had taken place.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , February 1973 , pp. 401 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertram, D. S. (1963). Observations on the chemosterilant effect of an alkylating agent, thio-tepa, on wild-caught Anopheles gambiae var. melas (Theo.) in Gambia West Africa, on laboratory-bred A.g. gambiae Giles and Aedes aegypti (L.).—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 57, 322–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulyginskaya, M. A., Ivanova, T. V. & Tshugunova, G. D. (1967). The effect of cytostatic substances upon gonads of some Lepidoptera.—Ént. Obozr. 46, 569–582.Google Scholar
Campion, D. G. & Lewis, C. T. (1971). Studies of competitiveness chemosterilant persistence and sperm structure in treated red bollworms, Diparopsis castanea (Hmps.). In Proceedings of a symposium on the sterility principle for insect control or eradication, jointly organized by the IAEA and FAO and held in Athens14–18 September 1970.—183–202. Vienna IAEA. (Proceedings series STI/PUB/265).Google Scholar
Campion, D. G. & Outram, I. (1967). Factors affecting male probing activity of the red bollworm Diparopsis castanea (Hmps.) in relation to sterility induced by tris(l-aziridinyl) phosphine oxide (tepa).—Ann. appl. Biol. 60, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmy, O. G. & Fahmy, M. J. (1954). Cytogenetic analysis of the action of carcinogens and tumour inhibitors in Drosophila melanogaster. II. The mechanism of induction of dominant lethals by 2:4:6-tri(ethyleneimino)-1:3:5-triazine.—J. Genet. 52, 603–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lüscher, M. (1968). Oocyte protection—a function of a corpus cardiacum hormone in the cockroach, Nauphoeta cinerea.—J. Insect Physiol. 14, 685–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masner, P. (1968). The inductors of differentiation of prefollicular tissue and the follicular epithelium in ovarioles of Pyrrhocoris apterus (Heteroptera).—J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 20, 1–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Matolín, S. (1969). The effect of chemosterilants on the embryonic development of Musca domestica L.—Acta ent. bohemoslov. 66, 65–69.Google Scholar
Nakayama, I. & Nagasawa, S. (1966). Histopathological observation of chemosterilizing effect of metepa on male adults of the adzuki bean weevil, Callosobruchus chinensis L. Studies of the chemosterilants of insects. XII.—Jap. J. appl. Ent. Zool. 10, 192–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outram, I. & Campion, D. G. (1967). Morphology of the male reproductive system and spermatophore of the red bollworm, Diparopsis castanea (Hmps.) and the possible effect of the chemosterilant tepa on the gross structure.—Ann. appl. Biol. 60, 439–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Possompés, B. (1955). Corpus allatum et développement ovarien chez Calliphora erythrocephala Meig. (Diptère).—C.R. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 241, 2001–2003.Google Scholar
Smittle, B. J., Schmitt, J. & Burden, G. S. (1966). Effects of tepa on the reproductive organs and embryogeny of the German cockroach.—J. econ. Ent. 59, 1419–1423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonnenblick, B. P. (1940). Cytology and development of the embryos of X-rayed adult Drosophila melanogaster.—Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 26, 373–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonnenblick, B. P. & Henshaw, P. S. (1941). Influence on development of certain dominant lethals induced by X-rays in Drosophila germ cells.—Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 48, 74–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. W. & Quintana-muñiz, V. (1968). Mortality staging of dominant lethals induced in the F1 generation of the sugarcane borer; Diatraea saccharalis (F.).— Radiat. Res. 36, 138–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1936). The function of the corpus allatum in the growth and reproduction of Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera).—Q. Jl microsc. Sci. (N.S.) 79, 91–122.Google Scholar