Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:17:19.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) by mating disruption on rice in India: effect of unnatural pheromone blends and application time on efficacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A. Cork*
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, Chatham Maritime, UK
K. De Souza
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, Chatham Maritime, UK
K. Krishnaiah
Affiliation:
Directorate of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India
D.V.S.S.R. Kumar
Affiliation:
Directorate of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India
A. Ashok Reddy
Affiliation:
Directorate of Rice Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India
E. Casagrande
Affiliation:
Agrisense-BCS, Pontypridd, Wales, UK
*
A. Cork, Natural Resources Institute, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK.

Abstract

Single applications of slow-release pheromone formulations were used to control yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas Walker, by mating disruption in two trials on rice in India. The first trial compared the efficacy of two formulations containing 1:10:1 and 1:10:0 ratios of (Z)-9-hexadecenal, (Z)-ll-hexadecenal and (Z)-9-octadecenal, components of the S. incertulas pheromone, and a commercially-available formulation, Selibate CS, containing the related Chilo suppressalis Walker pheromone, a 1:10:1 blend of (Z)-9-hexadecenal, (Z)-ll-hexadecenal and (Z)-13-octadecenal, with farmers' practice plots treated with insecticides. Pheromone trap catches indicated that in each of the pheromone-treated plots the catches of male moths were reduced by up to 98% compared with catches in the insecticide-treated plots suggesting that pheromone-mediated communication was disrupted. Larval damage ranged from 5.7 to 8.1% white heads (WH) in the insecticide-treated plots compared to a significantly reduced range of 2.1 to 2.4% WH in the pheromone-treated plots. There was no significant difference between the damage estimates recorded for each of the different pheromone treatments. A second trial compared the effect on efficacy of applying the two-component pheromone formulation on different dates, 9–12 and 39–44 days after transplanting. Both pheromone treatments gave significantly lower levels of WH damage compared to equivalent insecticide treated plots; 1.8, 2.0, and 6% respectively. In both trials rice grain yields increased by between 5 and 12% in pheromone-treated plots compared to insecticide treated plots, which was due, at least in part, to the cumulative effect of reduced stem borer damage in both the tillering and reproductive stages of the crop cycle. The formulations exhibited pseudo-zero order release rates with field lives of between 70 and 90 days.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowden, J. & Church, B.M. (1973) The influence of moonlight on catches of insects in light-traps in Africa. Part II: The effect of moon phase on light trap catches. Bulletin of Entomological Research 63, 129142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, J. & Morris, M.G. (1975) The influence of moonlight on catches in light traps in Africa. Part III: The effective radius of mercury-vapour light-traps and the analysis of catches using effective radius. Bulletin of Entomological Research 65, 303348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardé, R.T. & Elkinton, J.S. (1984) Field trapping with attractants: methods and interpretation techniques in pheromone research. pp. 355383in Bell, W.T. and Cardé, R.T. (Eds) Sex communication with pheromones. London, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Casagrande, E. (1993) The commercial implementation of mating disruption for the control of the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis, in rice in Spain. pp. 8289in McVeigh, L.J., Hall, D.R. and Beevor, P.S. (Eds) Use of pheromones and other semiochemicals in integrated control. Proceedings OILB/SROP Working Group Meeting,Chatham UK,May 1993.Google Scholar
Chelliah, S., Bentur, J.S. & Prakasa Rao, P.S. (1989) Approaches to rice management – achievements and opportunities. Oryza 26, 1226.Google Scholar
Cork, A. (1992) PVC resin formulations of pheromones for control of cotton and rice pests by mating disruption. p. 561 in Proceedings XIX International Congress of Entomology,Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Cork, A. & Basu, S.K. (1996) Control of the yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas by mating disruption with a PVC resin formulation of the sex pheromone of Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in India. Bulletin of Entomological Research 86, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cork, A., Beevor, P.S., Hall, D.R., Nesbitt, B.F., Arida, G.S. & Mochida, O. (1985) Components of the sex pheromone of the yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 37, 149153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cork, A., Hall, D.R., Mullings, J.L. & Jones, O.T. (1989) A new PVC resin formulation for controlled release of insect pheromones. pp. 910 in Pearlman, R. & Miller, J.A. (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Controlled Release of Bioactive Materials.Lincolnshire, IL, Controlled Release Society, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doane, C.C. & Brooks, T.W. (1981) Research and development of pheromones for insect control with emphasis on the pink bollworm. pp. 285303in Mitchell, E.R. (Ed.) Management of insect pests with semiochemicals. New York, Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, D.B. (1955) Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, H.M., Merkle, J.R. & Yamamoto, A. (1985) Pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): Field testing a new polyethylene tube dispenser for gossyplure. Journal of Economic Entomology 78, 14311436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangwar, B. & Ahamed, R. (1990) Effect of planting time on growth, yield and incidence of insect pests and diseases in rice. Oryza 27, 497500.Google Scholar
Geddes, A.M.W. & Iles, M. (1991) The relative importance of crop pests in South Asia. 103 pp. NRI Bulletin No. 39. NRI, Chatham Maritime, UK.Google Scholar
Ho, D.T. & Seshu Reddy, K.V. (1983) Monitoring of lepidopterous stem-borer population by pheromone and light traps. Insect Science and its Application 4, 1923.Google Scholar
Jiawei, D., Xiaojie, D., Shaofu, X., Xianhan, T., Taiping, Z., Yuxin, Z. & Meizhen, W. (1987) Studies on sex pheromone of yellow rice borer, Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker), Pyralidae, Lepidoptera. Scientia Sinica (Series B) 30, 967973.Google Scholar
Kalode, M.B. & Krishnaiah, K. (1991) Integrated pest management in rice. Indian Journal of Plant Protection 19, 117132.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J.S. (1978) The concepts of olfactory “arrestment” and “attraction”. Physiological Entomology 3, 9198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J.S. (1986) Some current issues in orientation to odour-sources. pp. 1125in Payne, T.L., Birch, M.C. and Kennedy, C.J.E. (Eds) Mechanisms in insect olfaction. Oxford, Claredon Press.Google Scholar
Legg, D.E. & Chiang, H.C. (1984) European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) infestations: Relating captures in pheromone and black-light traps in southern Minnesota cornfields. Journal of Economic Entomology 77, 14451448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litsinger, J.A. (1979) Major insect-pests of rainfed-wetland rice in tropical Asia. International Rice Research Newsletter 4, 1415.Google Scholar
Loevinsohn, M.E. (1991) Dispersal range of rice insect pests under natural conditions in the Philippines. International Rice Research Newsletter 16(3), 2324.Google Scholar
Loevinsohn, M.E. & Bandong, J.P. (1991) Correlations between light trap catches, field populations of yellow stem borer (YSB), and lunar phase. International Rice Research Newsletter 16(3), 2526.Google Scholar
McVeigh, E.M., McVeigh, L.J. & Cavanagh, G.G. (1983) A technique for tethering females of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to evaluate pheromone control methods. Bulletin of Entomological Research 73, 441446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minks, A.K. & Cardé, R.T. (1988) Disruption of pheromone communication in moths: is the natural blend really most efficacious? Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 49, 2536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muirhead-Thomson, R.C. (1991) Light traps versus pheromone traps. pp. 140151in Trap responses of flying insects. London, Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesbitt, B.F., Beevor, P.S., Hall, D.R., Lester, R. & Dyck, V.A. (1975) Identification of the female sex pheromones of the moth, Chilo suppressalis. Journal of Insect Physiology 21, 18831886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesbitt, B.F., Beevor, P.S., Hall, D.R., Lester, R. & Dyck, V.A. (1976) Identification of the female sex pheromone of the purple stem borer moth, Sesamia inferens. Insect Biochemistry 6, 105107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumark, S. & Teich, I. (1980) A dry and open pheromone trap activated by 4% diazinon for trapping moths of Spodoptera littoralis. Journal of Environmental Science and Health 15, 313321.Google Scholar
Nyambo, B.T. (1988) A comparative assessment of pheromone and light traps as tools for monitoring Heliothis armigera in Tanzania. Tropical Pest Management 34, 448454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandya, H.V., Shah, A.H. & Purohit, M.S. (1989) Influence of lunar cycle on light trap catches of rice stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas. Oryza 26, 108109.Google Scholar
Roelofs, W.L. (1978) Threshold hypothesis for pheromone perception. Journal of Chemical Ecology 4, 685699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatsuki, S., Kurihara, M., Usui, K., Ohguchi, Y., Uchiumi, K., Fukami, J., Arai, K., Yabuki, S. & Tanaka, F. (1983) Sex pheromone of the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis, (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), the third component, (Z)-9-hexadecenal. Applied Entomology and Zoology 18, 443446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatsuki, S., Sugie, H., Usui, K., Fukami, J., Sumartaputra, M.H. & Kuswadi, A.N. (1985) Identification of possible sex pheromone of the yellow stem borer moth, Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 20, 357359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venugopal Rao, N., Krishna Murthy Rao, B.H., Prasada Rao, V.L.V. & Satyanarayana Reddy, P. (1990) Economic injury levels for rice gall midge and yellow stem borer. Indian Journal of Entomology 52, 445451.Google Scholar
Zhu, P., Kong, F. & Wang, Z. (1987) Sex pheromone components of purple stem borer (Sesamia inferens) (Walker). Journal of Chemical Ecology 13, 983989.Google Scholar